Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05127915

US Pivotal Clinical Study of the Adient Absorbable Filter for the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism

The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Adient absorbable filter for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE: blood clot in the lungs). PE claims the lives of over 100,000 Americans each year, more than breast cancer, traffic fatalities and HIV combined.

Pharmaceutical anticoagulation (blood thinners) that reduce blood clot formation represent the standard of care for treating patients at risk for PE. However, for people who are temporarily unable to use anticoagulants, such as those who have suffered major trauma or those who are scheduled for surgical procedures, inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are used to help protect against PE. These blood filters prevent large blood clots that originate in the deep veins of the legs (deep vein thrombosis (DVT)) from reaching your lungs causing a potentially life-threatening PE.

Conventional metal IVC filters have been proven effective at reducing the incidence of PE, however, most require retrieval. If not retrieved within a timely manner (months), they can perforate the IVC, impale nearby organs with their barbed struts, and cause blood clots.

In contrast, the Adient absorbable filter traps blood clots similar to conventional metal IVC filters, but following the 8 week protection period, the filter itself breaks down into carbon dioxide and water. Hence no filter retrieval is required and complications are less likely due to the shortened indwell time. Once blood clots are trapped in the absorbable filter, the body's thrombolytic enzymes dissolve the clots within weeks while the filter itself resorbs in 6 to 8 months. The absorbable filter is braided from absorbable suture that has been proven safe over 4 decades.

The question being addressed with the randomized controlled trial portion is whether the placement of the absorbable filter in addition to current best practice PE prevention (sequential compression machines, compression stockings, and anticoagulants when indicated) significantly reduces the incidence of clinically significant PE in high risk subjects.

The absorbable filter will be indicated for the temporary prevention of PE in patients with transient high risk for venous thromboembolism (DVT and/or PE) with or without venous thromboembolic disease and as an enhancement to pharmaceutical anticoagulation and mechanical prophylaxis.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Aged 18 years or older

Willing to comply with the specified follow-up requirements including contrast enhanced CTs for the 9-month duration of the study

For female subjects of childbearing potential: a negative pregnancy test within 48 hours prior to the implantation procedure

For the prophylactic cohort, high risk VTE denoted by either:

Caprini score > 8 for surgical ICU, Parvizi score ≥ 150 for TKA (total knee replacement), ISS score ≥ 24 for trauma.

For the therapeutic cohort, documented VTE per the following:

Pulmonary thromboembolism when anticoagulants are contraindicated, Failure of anticoagulant therapy in thromboembolic diseases, Emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced.

Requirement of temporary PE protection (8 weeks) based on clinical judgment

Fully informed subject or caretaker consent having executed an Institutional Review Board (IRB) or approved informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Expected high VTE risk to extend beyond 8 weeks.

Vena cava filter currently implanted

History of abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy

Previous IVC filter placement/retrieval within 6 months prior to randomization

Confirmed positive blood cultures within the last 48 hours if there is bacteremia

Known sensitivity to radiographic contrast medium that cannot be adequately prophylactically pre-medicated

Known allergy or intolerance to IVC filter materials (i.e. PDSII absorbable suture)

Pregnant, lactating, or plans to become pregnant during investigation follow-up period

Renal insufficiency (GFR < 60) or requiring renal replacement therapy

IVC effective diameter (D) <16 mm or >28 mm anywhere within L1-L4, D = √(AP*Lat)

Less than 7cm from inferior-most renal vein to the iliac vein confluence

Duplication of the IVC

Any thrombus or occlusion in IVC on pre-procedural CT cavogram

Life expectancy of < 12 months

Simultaneous participation in another investigative drug or device trial that has not reached its primary endpoint

Other co-morbid condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could limit the subject's ability to participate in or would affect the scientific integrity of the study

Previously enrolled in a clinical investigation of the Adient filter.

For Roll In, patient has advanced heart failure or recent (6 weeks) myocardial infarction. - - -

Advanced heart failure is defined by NYHA class IV or AHA/ACC/HFSA stage D or LVEF < 40%. Subjects with MI diagnosed with ECG alone without MI history and symptoms are not excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Adient absorbable filter + best practice VTE prophylaxis

Device

Adient absorbable filter helps prevent PE during an 8 week protection period then gradually breaks down into carbon dioxide and water within 6 to 8 months. The absorbable filter does not require removal.

best practice VTE prophylaxis

Device

Best practice VTE prophylaxis includes sequential compression machines, compression stockings, and anticoagulants (blood thinners) when indicated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Effectiveness Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of new clinically significant PE

    Time frame: 2 weeks for asymptomatic proximal PE screening and through 8 weeks for symptomatic PE

    Clinically significant PE includes asymptomatic proximal PE screened at 2 weeks, in addition to symptomatic PE through 8 weeks post index event confirmed by computed tomography (CT) angiography. Proximal PE includes thrombus (blood clots) observed in the pulmonary trunk, main pulmonary arteries, or lobar arteries.

  2. Primary Composite Safety Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of absorbable filter deployment without complications

    Time frame: 96 hours to 9 months depending on the safety parameter

    Potential complications include: (a) caval thrombotic occlusion within 9 months, (b) all-filter embolization within 9 months, (c) serious filter-related complications within 9 months, (d) filter placement procedural related Series Adverse Events (SAE) within the perioperative period (96 hours), (e) filter placement vascular access site SAE within the perioperative period, (f) symptomatic PE subsequent to filter deployment within 9 months.

  3. Primary DVT Safety Endpoint - Prophylactic Cohort: incidence of all DVT post index event

    Time frame: 9 months overall duration

    All DVT includes both symptomatic DVT and asymptomatic DVT screened at 2 weeks, 10 weeks and 9 months.

  4. Primary Composite Safety and Effectiveness Endpoint - Therapeutic Cohort: composite rate of technical filter placement success without complications

    Time frame: 9 months

    Potential complications include (a) new symptomatic PE through 8 weeks, (b) filter migration (> 2cm), (c) filter embolization, (d) caval perforation (> 5mm), (e) symptomatic caval thrombosis, and (f) any other symptomatic filter-related complication requiring invasive intervention, or filter related death.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of new symptomatic PE through 8 weeks confirmed by CT angiography

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Miller Score for symptomatic and asymptomatic PE

    Time frame: 9 months

    Quantification of the occlusion of the pulmonary vascular bed from a PE.

  3. Incidence of caval occlusion / thrombosis confirmed by CT cavogram

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  4. Incidence of IVC caval stenosis and occlusion confirmed by CT cavogram

    Time frame: 9 months

  5. Incidence of common femoral and iliac venous thrombosis ipsilateral to filter insertion site

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 9 months

    Detected on ultrasound.

  6. Incidence of DVT

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 10 weeks, and 9 months

    Detected on ultrasound.

  7. Incidence of major procedure-related or device-related adverse events

    Time frame: 9 months

  8. Incidence of major bleeding

    Time frame: 9 months

    Major bleeding defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostases.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Adient Medical

Industry

Collaborators

  • Avania
  • ICON plc

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Pivotal Study With Randomized Controlled Prophylactic and Independent Therapeutic Cohorts to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Absorbable Vena Cava Filter for Pulmonary Embolism Prevention

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Nov 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Aug 31, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.