Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07528365

Urea for Treatment of Hyponatremia in Patients With SIAD Unresponsive to Fluid Restriction

Hyponatremia due to SIAD is frequently insufficiently corrected by fluid restriction alone, which remains the first-line therapy but is often poorly tolerated. Urea supplementation is recommended as second-line therapy.

This prospective study evaluates the effectiveness of oral urea supplementation in patients with chronic SIAD and persistent hyponatremia despite fluid restriction.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza

Turin, Piedmont, Italy, 10126, Italy

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Silvia Grottoli, Professor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+390116337400

About this study

Hyponatremia (serum sodium, s-Na <135 mmol/L) is the most common electrolyte disorder in hospitalized patients, with prevalence increasing with length of hospital stay. Among hypotonic euvolemic hyponatremias, the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuresis (SIAD) is the most frequent cause and is characterized by impaired free water excretion. SIAD may result from central nervous system disorders, pulmonary diseases, malignancies, or medications, and remains a diagnosis of exclusion.

When possible, treating the underlying cause can resolve the syndrome; however, in many cases the cause remains unknown and therapeutic options are limited. First-line treatment is fluid restriction, which is often insufficient and difficult to maintain in the long term. AVP receptor antagonists, such as tolvaptan, are effective but expensive and may carry a risk of overly rapid correction of serum sodium.

Second-line therapy recommended by current guidelines is urea supplementation, which has shown safety and efficacy in normalizing serum sodium. However, most available evidence derives from retrospective studies, and prospective data are limited.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of urea supplementation in patients with chronic, mildly symptomatic SIAD-related hyponatremia not adequately controlled by fluid restriction (≤1500 mL/day), and to explore its effects on neuroendocrine adaptation, body fluid composition, and bone metabolism.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of SIAD established prior to study inclusion, defined as:
  • Plasma sodium concentration <135 mmol/L
  • Plasma osmolality <300 mOsm/kg
  • Urine osmolality >100 mOsm/kg
  • Urine sodium concentration >30 mmol/L
  • Intact adrenal and thyroidal function and no use of diuretics in the last 4 weeks
  • Clinical euvolemia, defined as an absence of signs of hypovolemia (orthostasis, tachycardia, decreased skin turgor, dry mucous membranes) or hypervolemia (edema, ascites)

Fulfillment of all diagnostic criteria at baseline (day 0) was not mandatory, as the diagnosis of SIAD had already been established prior to study inclusion based on overall clinical assessment.

  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion criteria

  • Chronic hypotonic hyponatremia secondary to another etiology
  • Presence of moderate to severe symptoms attributable to plasma hypotonicity
  • Severe hypotonic hyponatremia (serum sodium <120 mmol/L)
  • Another ongoing drug treatment for hyponatremia (including vaptans and salt tablets)
  • Severe hepatic insufficiency
  • eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m²
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Known allergy or intolerance to urea
  • Patient refusal or inability to provide written informed consent

Treatment and study plan

urea

Dietary Supplement

Patients with persistent hyponatremia (sodium corrected for glucose <135 mmol/L) after ≥1 week of fluid restriction (≤1500 mL/day) will receive urea 30 g/day (2 sachets; 1 in the morning and 1 in the evening) dissolved in water, while maintaining fluid restriction ≤1500 mL/day.

Blood and urine evaluations will be performed at day 1, day 21±4 and day 42±4, with additional assessments (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA] questionnaire and bioelectrical impedance vector analysis [BIVA]) at selected visits.

Urea dose adjustments will be based on serum sodium at day 21±4: 45 g/day if Na 130-134 mmol/L, or 60 g/day if Na <130 mmol/L (maximum 60 g/day).

In case of intolerance, the dose will be reduced by one sachet from the planned dose.

After day 42±4, urea will be discontinued. A final evaluation will be performed 10±2 days after discontinuation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in serum sodium levels

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 21±4, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post urea discontinuation

    Change in serum sodium from baseline to assess the acute and chronic effectiveness of urea therapy in outpatients with SIAD not adequately compensated by fluid restriction (≤1500 mL/day)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in copeptin, NT-proBNP, and MR-proADM levels

    Time frame: Baseline, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post-therapy

    Changes in copeptin, NT-proBNP, and MR-proADM levels from baseline to day 42±4 and after urea discontinuation at 10±2 days, to evaluate chronic neuroendocrine response to urea therapy

  2. Bioimpedance adaptation

    Time frame: Baseline, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post-therapy

    Changes in intra- and extracellular fluid volumes as assessed by bioimpedance vector analysis (BIVA) from baseline to day 42±4 and after urea discontinuation at 10±2 days

  3. Bone turnover markers

    Time frame: Baseline, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post-therapy

    Changes in serum C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and N-terminal pro-peptide of type 1 collagen (PINP) from baseline to day 42±4 and after urea discontinuation at 10±2 days, to evaluate bone metabolism response to variation of serum sodium levels

  4. Cognitive performance

    Time frame: Baseline and day 42±4

    Changes in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores from baseline to day 42±4, to evaluate the effect of sodium increase normalization on cognitive function

  5. Variation in other Serum and Urinary Analytes

    Time frame: Baseline, day 1, day 21±4, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post urea discontinuation

    Blood (potassium, creatinine, urea, uric acid, glucose, plasma osmolality) and urine analytes (potassium, creatinine, urea, uric acid, urine osmolality, and fractional excretion of sodium, potassium, urea, and uric acid) will be assessed at baseline, day 1, day 21±4, day 42±4, and 10±2 days post-therapy to evaluate changes following initiation and discontinuation of urea supplementation, and to explore potential predictors of treatment response and remission of hyponatremia

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of Oral Urea Supplementation in Patients With SIAD Not Adequately Controlled With Fluid Restriction

Acronym: UREA-BIVA

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.