Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04516577

Updated Severity and Prognosis Score of Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis

By updating the chest HRCT scoring criteria of patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, a new and more perfect system for evaluating the severity of alveolar proteinosis will be established.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Shanghai pulmonary hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433, China

About this study

In past, investigators summarized a method that was the severity and prognosis of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (SPSP) to assess the severity and prognosis of patients with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (auto PAP). The SPSP included five aspects: smoking, symptom, PaO2, chest CT score at specific levels (aortic arch, carina, pulmonary vein confluence, and superior septal level) and DLCO %predicted. But the chest CT score only focused on range of lesions, and inaccurate. So, investigators plan to adopt new score which involves the assessing to range and density.

In the new Chest HRCT score, we added the density score. The average density of the lesions at a particular level of the patient's chest HRCT was measured by computer and classified into three degrees: mild (less than -400), moderate (greater than -400 and less than -100) and severe (greater than 100), denoted as 1 ', 2 'and3', respectively.

The range score of lung opacity was estimated using a five-point scale: no opacity = 0; opacity involving < 25% of a region of hemithorax = 1; 25-50% = 2; 50-75% = 3; and ≥ 75% = 4.

The lesion score for each layer is equal to the density score multiplied by the range score. The chest HRCT score was calculated by summing the lung opacity scores of the four representative regions of each hemithorax, and divided into several level: no opacity = 0; ≤10 = 1; 11 - 20 = 2; 21 - 30 = 3; 31 -40 = 4; > 40 = 5.

According to the new chest HRCT score, the SPSP will be updated to SPSP II. In this study, patients with auto PAP from three centers (Shanghai Lung Hospital, Peking Union Medical College Hospital and Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital) were enrolled to evaluate the severity of disease severity score (DSS), SPSP and SPSP II, respectively, to evaluate the pros and cons of different scores and their impact on prognosis.

About 30 newly diagnosed auto PAP patients were recruited, and were assess disease severity on the basis on SPSP II scores. According to SPSP II scores, appropriate treatment was used for the patients, who were followed up for 3 months.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The patients had be diagnosed with autoimmune pulmonary alveolar proteinosis through pathology or bronchial alveolar lavage fluid (BALF).
  • The patients are old than 18 year.
  • .Every patient had a complete medical history, chest HRCT, pulmonary function and arterial blood gas analysis.
  • The patients have high level antibody of GM-CSF in serum or BALF.

Exclusion criteria

  • The patients had a congenital or secondary pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

Treatment and study plan

Assesssing the severity of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

Other

Three severity scores will be used to assess the severity of patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.

Primary outcomes

  1. The severity and prognosis of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis

    Time frame: From July 2020 to December 2021

    The second severity and prognosis score of PAP (SPSP II) involves the range and density of lesion in chest CT of patients

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Severity of Patients With Pulmonary Alveolar Proteinosis (PAP) Through Disease Severity Score (DSS), Severity and Prognosis Score of PAP (SPSP) and SPSPII

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Aug 18, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 9, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.