Sacramento VA Medical Center
Mather, California, 95655, United States
NCT Number: NCT01383252
In a prospective, randomized, controlled study, two methods (water method vs. air method) of performing colonoscopy will be compared in patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy for CRC screening. The investigators hypothesize that:
1. Study method increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy 2. Study method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Mather, California, 95655, United States
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening for the high and the low risk healthy asymptomatic Veterans Affairs (VA) patients is being promoted. Compliance with this Directive will result in an increased number of VA patients undergoing colonoscopy.
The demand for colonoscopy far exceeds the capacity available to perform the procedure in the VA system. The conventional practice for colonoscopy at VA facilities across the country is to perform colonoscopy under conscious sedation with air insufflation. Efficiency is governed by the fact that sedated patients require time and space for recovery and these are major limiting factors in the current setting for the use of colonoscopy for CRC screening.
In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (RCT), two methods of performing colonoscopy will be compared in patients undergoing unsedated colonoscopy for CRC screening. We compared the water infusion in lieu of air insufflation (water method) with the conventional air insufflation method. We hypothesize that the water method (Study method) increases overall cecal intubation with comparable assessment of current experience and patient willingness to repeat future colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy. In addition, the water method improves bowel preparation and increases polyp pickup rate.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Air pump is turned off, water is infused using a peristaltic pump to aid colonoscope insertion until the cecum is reached. Air pockets and dirty water are suctioned before clean water is infused (exchange) to facilitate scope insertion.
Other names: Water method, Screening colonoscopy
Conventional air method with minimal insufflation of air to aid scope insertion until the cecum is reached. Water in aliquots will be used for irrigation and cleansing.
Other names: Screening colonoscopy
Time frame: 24 months
successful cecal intubation
Time frame: 24 months
Adenoma detection rate
VA Northern California Health Care System
Fed
Comparison of Study Method Versus Conventional Method for Performing Unsedated Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04369053
Adenoma, Colon Cancer
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07108569
Colon Polyp, Colonic Adenoma
Würzburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06345105
Artificial Intelligence, Colon Adenoma
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05405530
Colon Cancer, Colon Polyp
Zhengzhou, Henan, China
View Trial Details