University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
NCT Number: NCT02695537
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of Epidiolex at various doses between 5 mg/kg/day and 50 mg/kg/day as an additional (add-on) drug for treating debilitating, drug-resistant epilepsy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 year–19 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States
The specific goals of this phase I dose finding study, conducted in consecutively enrolled patients 1-19 years of age, are to prospectively and longitudinally assess the safety and tolerability, including cognitive effects, of Cannabidiol (CBD) at various doses between 5 mg/kg/day and 25 mg/kg/day, with additional titration in some cases up to 50 mg/kg/day. In order to participate in the study, participants will need to fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The goal of the study is to fulfill the mandate of "Carly's Law" and to provide patients with debilitating epileptic conditions with access to CBD as an add-on treatment. Other care including routine neurological care unrelated to participation in the CBD study will need to be provided by patients' primary/current treating neurologist.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Epidiolex oral solution (100 mg/mL CBD concentration) with inactive ingredients including anhydrous ethanol, sesame seed oil, strawberry flavor, and sucralose).
Other names: Cannabidiol, CBD
Time frame: For 1 Year following Enrollment
Severe adverse events (SAEs) were defined as increase in seizure frequency by more than 100% leading to emergency room visit or hospitalization. During study clinic and phone visits, adverse and severe adverse event monitoring and reporting were assessed among all participants. Data was recorded and stored in the UAB RedCap System.
Time frame: For 1 Year following Enrollment
During study clinic visits, participant vital signs, including blood pressure and heart rate, were collected. Data was recorded and stored in the UAB RedCap System. Clinically significant was determined by using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events categorized as a grade 3 or above were considered clinically significant. Adverse events grade 4 or above were considered severe adverse events.
Time frame: For 1 Year following Enrollment
During study clinic visits, participants received laboratory testing to assess for side effects and toxicity. Data was recorded and stored in the UAB RedCap System. Laboratory testing included Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP; included Liver Function Tests (LFTs) mainly looking at alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST)), Urine Analysis (UA), and Antiepileptic Drug (AED) levels. Clinically significant was determined by using the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03. Adverse events categorized as a grade 3 or above were considered clinically significant. Adverse events grade 4 or above were considered severe adverse events.
Time frame: For 1 Year following Enrollment
Participants were given seizure diary logs and dairy data collection was done at study clinic visits. Data was recorded and stored in the UAB RedCap System. The analysis plan was to assess the pattern of change in seizure frequency over time, relative to baseline, following CBD exposure. Since the baseline measure was reported at the time of screening, there was some tendency to overestimate the frequency of seizures in the historically reported interval. This was examined by comparing the initial study visits improvement versus the pattern of control over time, and was assessed using graphic techniques and summary statistics.
Time frame: For 1 Year following Enrollment
Seizure severity was collected during study clinic and phone visits using the Chalfont Seizure Severity Scale (CSSS) (Duncan & Sander, 1991, JNNP) through verbal reporting. The CSSS measured components of seizures most disturbing or disruptive to the participants. The total scores for a given seizure type was its severity score. High scores indicated high severity of the seizures (no fixed maximum value), while a score of zero indicated low severity. Scores were recorded and stored in the UAB RedCap System. The analysis plan was to assess the pattern of change in seizure severity scores over time, relative to baseline, following CBD exposure. Since the baseline measure was reported at the time of screening, there was some tendency to overestimate the severity of seizures in the historically reported interval. This was examined by comparing the initial study visits improvement versus the pattern of control over time, and was assessed using graphic techniques and summary statistics.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06714448
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Chilly-Mazarin, France
View Trial DetailsNCT04770337
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04259125
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Oakland, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03369522
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Béthune, France
View Trial Details