Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
NCT Number: NCT04758299
To test competing sets of information for consumers on how to interpret hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 home test kit results and whether they report plans to take CDC-recommended actions to protect themselves and others given their test results and two critical aspects of their clinical context: symptoms, recent close exposures. Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit (the first kit authorized for over the counter use) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
To test competing sets of information for consumers on how to interpret hypothetical SARS-CoV-2 home test kit results and whether they report plans to take CDC [Centers for Disease Control]-recommended actions to protect themselves and others given their test results and two critical aspects of their clinical context: symptoms, recent close exposures. Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit (the first kit authorized for over the counter use) for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention).
Participants will be randomized to receive either information from the FDA authorized Ellume home test kit for what actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test (usual care) or a decision science-based design of similar length (intervention). They will be given time to read the documents and the opportunity to download a full "instructions for use" document (the FDA authorized for the ELLUME test kit). They will then be randomized to one of four conditions, asking them to imagine a clinical context: a person with no symptoms and no close COVID-19 contact, no symptoms and close contact,
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
decision science-based design explaining actions to take for a negative or positive COVID-19 test
Time frame: day 1
choice of actions consistent with CDC-recommendations (eg, isolate or not) for various clinical scenarios (eg, with/without known exposure, with/without symptoms)
Which of the following are safe for Jamie to do over the next week about being around others? [safe, not safe]
Time frame: day 1
Judgments about the likelihood of COVID-19 infection with a negative or positive test result
How likely is it that Jamie is infected with COVID-19? (choose one)
Time frame: day 1
Judgments about the likelihood of COVID-19 infection with a negative ot positive test result
Response using a "slider" to capture numeric estimate
Time frame: day 1
Change in intent to practice standard public health practices to reduce COVID-19 transmission (hand washing, social distancing, masks) - question asked before and after seeing test result
What else do you think Jamie should do to protect himself and others from COVID-19? [choose: all of the time, most of the time, some of the time, a little of the time, none of the time] In general
Outside your home
Time frame: day 1
how easy/hard is it to use information about interpreting test results
How easy or difficult was it to read the information about interpreting the test result?" (check one)
Time frame: day 1
how useful is the information about interpreting test results
The information about interpreting the home test kit results was (check one)
Time frame: day 1
How helpful was the information for what to if test was positive
The information helped me know what to do if test result is positive
a. Strongly agree
Time frame: day 1
How helpful was the information for what to if test was negative
The information helped me know what to do if test result is negative
a. Strongly agree
Time frame: day 1
According to the test's FDA-authorized label, a clinical study conducted in the USA in 2020 showed that the test "correctly identified 96% of positive samples and 100% of negative samples in patients with symptoms. In people without symptoms the test correctly identified 91% of positive samples and 96% of negative samples."
Based on this information, if Jamie has COVID now, what is the chance that the test will be wrong and say that he does not?
RESPONSE (probability estimate) using slider
Time frame: day 1
correct ordering of posttest probability of infection risk (derived from qualitative and quantitative ratings)
Barry Dewitt
Other
At Home Self-testing Kits for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2) : A Randomized Trial Assessing How Consumers Interpret and Act on Test Results
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05365750
COVID-19 Testing
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05139927
COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05178290
Behavior, COVID-19 Testing
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04757298
COVID-19 Testing
Newark, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details