Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03493087

Underlying Causes of Low Vitamin K Status in Hemodialysis Patients

Studies have shown that patients with chronic kidney disease in hemodialysis have a low vitamin K status which is believed to be related to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and increased bleeding tendency. The underlying causes of low vitamin K status in hemodialysis patients is unknown. Thus, the aim of this study is to investigate why hemodialysis patients have a low vitamin K status and how to improve it.

This study is composed of five trials. Four of them are based on possible hypotheses to the low vitamin K status. The hypotheses are:

1. The daily intake of vitamin K is insufficient. 2. Vitamin K is removed from the blood during dialysis. 3. Absorption in the intestines is impaired. 4. The analysis method (dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated MGP) is influenced by the patients' protein intake.

The purpose of the fifth trial is to investigate solutions to improve the vitamin K status of hemodialysis. One is to improve vitamin K status through diet with an increased focus on foods with high concentrations of vitamin K while considering phosphate, potassium and fluid restrictions. The second is to increase vitamin K status through a daily supplement of 360µg Menakinon-7.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Studies have reported a low vitamin K status in chronic kidney disease patients in hemodialysis linked to an increased risk of atherosclerosis and increased bleeding tendency. The overall aim of this study is to investigate the underlying causes of the reported low vitamin K status and to improve the patients' vitamin K status through diet and supplement. The study is divided in 5 sub-trials listed below. Sub-trial 1-4 focuses on determining the underlying course of low vitamin K status while sub-trial 5 deals with possible solutions to the reported low vitamin K status.

The analysis method used to determine vitamin K status is dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated Matrix-Gla-Protein (dp-ucMGP). Dp-ucMGP is the inactive form of the protein MGP whose activation is vitamin K dependent. The dp-ucMGP analysis method is not a direct measure of vitamin K status. However, an increased concentration of dp-ucMGP is a manifestation of a low vitamin K status and vice versa.

Sub-trial 1: Intake of vitamin K Aim: To assess the patients' intake of vitamin K. Hypothesis: The daily intake of vitamin K is insufficient. Method: Patients are asked to fill out a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). The FFQ is based on their intake of different foods rich in vitamin K during the last month. To compare the results from the FFQ with their actual vitamin K status a blood sample is collected and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. Participants: 30.

Sub-trial 2: The influence of dialysis Aim: To examine whether vitamin K status is compromised during dialysis. Hypothesis: Vitamin K is removed from the blood during dialysis. Method: A blood test is collected before and after dialysis and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. At the end of the dialysis a sample of the remaining dialysis-water is collected and analyzed to determine dp-ucMGP. Furthermore, the patients will be weighed before and after dialysis with the purpose of calculating concentrations. Participants: 16 (the analysis of the dialysis water is done for five patients at first, if the results are useful the analysis is done for every participant).

Sub-trial 3: Absorption Aim: To investigate whether a decreased absorption can be the cause of the low vitamin K status. Hypothesis: Absorption in the intestines is impaired. Method: A D-xylose test is performed. The participants are given a dose of 15g D-xylose dissolved in water and after one hour a sample of blood is collected to determine D-xylose in serum. Prior to this trial the patients need to be fasting.The patients are asked to fill out a FFQ concerning their intake of fat during the last month. Participants: 16

Sub-trial 4: Concentrations of dp-ucMGP is influenced by a low protein intake. Aim: To determine if a low protein intake influence the dp-ucMGP analysis method. Hypothesis: The analysis method (dephosphorylated-uncarboxylated MGP) is influenced by the patients' protein intake. Method: Patients are given a daily protein supplement for 14 days. Before and after the intervention a blood test is collected and the concentration of dp-ucMGP is determined and compared. Moreover, the patients are asked to fill out a FFQ concerning their intake of protein during the last month. Participants: 16

Sub-trial 5: Intervention with vitamin K Aim: To investigate whether a diet or supplement with tablets is best for improve vitamin K status. Hypothesis: If the intake of vitamin K is insufficient the diet rich in vitamin K should be sufficient. However, if absorption is compromised or vitamin K is influenced by dialysis a larger dose of vitamin K might be necessary. Method: This trial lasts for 15 weeks divided in two periods of six weeks and a three week wash out period in-between. One period focuses on a diet rich in vitamin K while dealing with the possible restrictions on phosphate, potassium and fluid for hemodialysis patients. The intervention in the other period consists of a supplement of 360μg Menakinon-7/day. Blood samples are collected at the beginning, middle and end of both periods. These blood samples are analyzed to determine dp-uc-MGP during the intervention period. Moreover, coagulations factor 2, 7, 10, vitamin A and D status and calcification propency score analysis will be done as well if the funds allow it. Patients are asked to fill out a questionnaire concerning physical and mental wellbeing and the presence of bruising at the beginning and end of both periods to determine whether vitamin K has an effect. Participants: 24

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic kidney disease
  • Hemodialysis (> 3 months) at Herlev Hospital, Nephrological department
  • Understands and are able to read danish
  • Able to collaborate on diet etc.

Exclusion criteria

  • Warfarin treatment
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Prior intake of vitamin K supplements
  • Short bowl disease, pancreatitis or other malabsorption diseases/syndromes
  • Dementia
  • Diabetes Mellitus (only an exclusion criterion in sub-trial 3: Absorption of vitamin K)

Treatment and study plan

Menakinon 7

Dietary Supplement

Menakinon 7 - One tablet a day against vitamin K deficiency

Diet rich in vitamin K

Dietary Supplement

Diet with large content of vegetables and dairy products

Primary outcomes

  1. Δ-dp-uc-MGP (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Comparison of concentration of dp-ucMGP in blood samples through out the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. dp-ucMGP status (Sub-trial 1)

    Time frame: 1 day

    Concentration of dp-ucMGP in a blood sample collected before dialysis

  2. Vitamin K intake (Sub-trial 1)

    Time frame: 1 month

    Intake of vitamin K is estimated from FFQ results

  3. dp-ucMGP concentration in dialysis water (Sub-trial 2)

    Time frame: 1 day

    A sample of dialysis water is tested for dp-ucMGP

  4. Δ-concentration of dp-ucMGP (Sub-trial 2)

    Time frame: 1 day

    Concentration of dp-ucMGP in a blood sample collected before dialysis is compared with the concentration in a blood sample collected after dialysis

  5. Δ-weight (Sub-trial 2)

    Time frame: 1 day

    The patient's weight before and after dialysis is compared

  6. Concentration of D-xylose (Sub-trial 3)

    Time frame: 1 day

    Concentration of D-xylose in the blood an hour after intake of 15g of D-xylose

  7. Fat in the diet (Sub-trial 3)

    Time frame: 1 day

    The amount of fat in the diet is assessed from FFQ results

  8. Δ-dp-uc-MGP (Sub-trial 4)

    Time frame: 14 day

    intervention with protein is compared with the concentration in a blood sample collected after the intervention

  9. Protein in the diet (Sub-trial 4)

    Time frame: 14 days

    The amount of protein in the diet is assessed from FFQ results

  10. Calcification (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Blood samples are analyzed via calcification propensity score, T50

  11. Quality of life (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    The results from mental and physical well being questionnaires are compared Based on SF-36 Danish version. Eight questions with scales ranges from 1-5 with 5 being the worse outcome. The questions are looked at individually and together.

  12. The patient's perception of the presence of bruises (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    The patient assess the changes in bruising in a questionnaire.

  13. Δ-factor 2, 7,10 concentration (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Comparison of concentration of factor 2,7,10 in blood samples before and after both interventions

Other outcomes

  1. Phosphate (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Changes in p-phosphate through out the intervention period

  2. Potassium (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Changes in p-potassium through out the intervention period

  3. Vitamin A (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Changes in p-vitamin A through out the supplement period

  4. Vitamin D (Sub-trial 5)

    Time frame: 15 weeks

    Changes in p-vitamin D through out the supplement period

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Copenhagen

Other

Collaborators

  • Herlev Hospital

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Apr 10, 2018
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.