Under-the-nose facemask
DevicePatients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure that need noninvasive ventilation and are randomized in the experimental group will receive the AF541 facemask used with the under-the-nose cushion.
NCT Number: NCT04102735
Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is essential to treat acute hypercapnic respiratory failure. However, facial pressure ulcers appearing during facemask-delivered noninvasive ventilation are a source of NIV failure by interface intolerance.
A Philips facemask (model : AF541 SE Oro-Nasal mask) has the particularity to display two options for its positioning : a usually used "over-the-nose" positioning or an "under-the-nose" positioning that is supposed to reduce the incidence of facial pressure ulcers while keeping in the same time the qualities of a standard facemask.
The goal of this controlled randomized trial is to test the hypothesis that the "under-the-nose" positioning actually reduces the incidence of facial pressure ulcers, compared to the usually used "over-the-nose" positioning.
Results of this trial should lead to the proposition of a new interface strategy to prevent facial pressure ulcers and therefore to improve the tolerance of NIV via the use of facemasks displaying an "under-the-nose" positioning.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Centre Hospitalier Arras, Arras, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure that need noninvasive ventilation and are randomized in the experimental group will receive the AF541 facemask used with the under-the-nose cushion.
Patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure that need non-invasive ventilation and are randomized in the comparator group will receive the AF541 facemask used with the over-the-nose cushion.
Time frame: 3 days after NIV initiation
The primary endpoint is the development of a facial pressure ulcer within the first 3 days after NIV initiation
Time frame: 7 days after NIV initiation
This secondary endpoint is the delay (in hours) between NIV initiation and the development of a facial pressure ulcer.
Time frame: 7 days after NIV initiation
This secondary endpoint is the highest facial pressure ulcer severity score observed during patient hospitalization. This score is evaluated according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel guidelines (Edsberg LE et al., 2016). Stage 1 pressure injury (the less severe score) corresponds to intact skin with a localized area of nonblanchable erythema. Stage 2 pressure injury corresponds to partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis. Stage 3 pressure injury corresponds to full-thickness skin loss. Stage 4 pressure injury (the most severe score) corresponds to full-thickness skin and tissue loss.
Time frame: 24 hours after NIV initiation
This secondary endpoint is the comfort patient score at 24 hours after NIV initiation. This score is a numeric scale, validated for NIV (Lemyze M et al., 2013 ; Gregoretti C et al., 2002), going from 1 to 5 (1: very uncomfortable ; 2: uncomfortable ; 3: acceptable ; 4: quite comfortable ; 5: comfortable).
Time frame: 7 days after NIV initiation
This secondary endpoint is the incidence of mask changes related to interface intolerance during patient hospitalization.
Time frame: 7 days after NIV initiation
This secondary endpoint is the incidence of NIV failure defined as the need to resort to intubation or palliative care (in the case of a do-not-intubate order) during patient hospitalization. NIV failures may be caused by refractory respiratory acidosis, refractory hypoxemia, pressure ulcers, interface intolerance, excessive unintentional air leaks or shock.
Centre Hospitalier Arras
Other
UNDER the Nose vs. Over the Nose Face Mask to Prevent Facial PRESSURE Ulcers During Face Mask-noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
Acronym: UNDER PRESSURE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06204276
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT02111876
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, Apnea
Geneva, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06495086
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, COPD Exacerbations
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04109560
Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure, COPD Exacerbation
CABA, Argentina
View Trial Details