University College London Hospitals
London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT05493397
This study aims to investigate the accuracy and viability of transcutaneous laryngeal ultrasound (US) in detecting impairments of vocal fold movement in people with neurological disorders.
The accuracy and viability of laryngeal US compared with reference standard fibreoptic nasendoscopic examination (FNE) will be evaluated. The study also includes measurements of clinician reliability in US image acquisition and interpretation, and assess the acceptability of US assessment to people with neurological disorders. Data will be used to assess the ability of US to detect other laryngeal pathology, and to calculate the sample size required for a validation study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
London, WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom
The availability of cheaper and more portable ultrasound (US) machines has resulted in the extension of the use of US beyond the radiology department into diverse clinical areas. In particular, the Covid-19 pandemic has intensified interest in US as an alternative tool to use within the Speech and Language Therapy (SLT) profession to assess swallowing and airway disorders as access to routine assessment tools such as fibreoptic endoscopic examination (FNE) was restricted to its due aerosol-generating properties (Bolton et al., 2020).
The use of US by allied health professionals, such as Speech and Language Therapists (SLTs), is driven by National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance and government policy (The Royal College of Radiologists, 2017) whereby the range of applications and locations where US can be used makes it impractical to deliver this imaging using radiologists or sonographers alone.
The application of laryngeal US is not new within the medical profession and there is considerable mounting evidence to support both the diagnostic ability and feasibility of laryngeal US for diagnosing impairments of vocal fold movement. Laryngeal US has been found to have both high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing disorders of vocal fold movement in the post-surgical (specifically thyroid) population. Findings of a recent rapid review exploring the utility of laryngeal US for the assessment of vocal fold function revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% to detect normal versus disordered vocal fold function with a linear probe with range frequencies (e.g.6-13Hz) (Allen et al., 2020). To date, there are no studies exploring use of laryngeal US in assessing vocal fold movement in neurological conditions, despite the prominence of vocal fold impairments in this patient group.
In addition to increased accuracy, laryngeal US has many other advantages as an assessment and monitoring tool. Arguably, the greatest advantage of laryngeal US over FNE is its bedside accessibility and potential avoidance of intrusive procedures. This is particularly paramount in patients that require multiple invasive procedures, for example, combined FNE and non-invasive ventilation, cough augmentation, suction, nasogastric tube feeding and high flow oxygen therapy. Furthermore, if evaluation by laryngeal US was led by SLT, it would not require patient transport to Ear, Nose & Throat (ENT) clinics or presence of an ENT consultant at bedside; potentially expediting access to diagnosis of vocal fold function impairments and reducing cost.
A trained SLT could utilise US to identify presence or absence of vocal fold function impairment in patients with neurological disease. Primary examples are cases where vocal fold impairment is a known or anticipated symptom of the underlying neurological condition (such as brainstem stroke, multiple system atrophy and/or neuromuscular conditions such as Charot Marie Tooth disease). In these cases, the SLT could assess using laryngeal US to ascertain a vocal fold diagnosis to inform timely management or treatment plan. In cases where intrusive respiratory interventions may provoke issues with vocal fold movement (such as cough augmentation) the SLT can provide non-invasive 'real-time' monitored laryngeal US assessment which will directly influence combined SLT and physiotherapy management in patients with combined bulbar and respiratory disease. They could also use US to inform the relative urgency of subsequent ENT opinion. This is particularly pertinent at NHNN where there is no on-site access to ENT.
This research project is designed to improve the care pathway for patients with suspected vocal fold mobility impairment secondary to neurological disease. The current standard of practice for patients with suspected impairment of vocal fold mobility at our tertiary neurological centre is referral for routine assessment by an ENT doctor. The timescale from referral to assessment can be up to 12 weeks. FNE is an intrusive procedure requiring placement of a flexible scope into the throat via the nose. This can be uncomfortable for patients and, in some cases, contraindicated (Langmore, 2001). The clinical cost of an ENT-led nasendoscopy is £645. The procedure also requires pre- and post- assessment time and expertise for decontamination of the nasendoscope. Whereas, the cost of the US, led by and SLT is £62. The decontamination process is quick (using a simple wipe) and therefore more cost effective. Laryngeal US examination can be performed by an SLT within 48 hours of referral, leading to more timely assessment and intervention. Furthermore, preliminary findings from our patient advisory group indicate that US is a more comfortable and tolerable assessment. The outcomes of this study has the potential to influence clinical pathways at our tertiary centre to provide a service that is rapid, non-intrusive and cost-effective in the assessment for early diagnosis and management of vocal fold impairment.
This is a prospective cross-sectional mixed-methods study of consecutive patients referred from our tertiary neurological centre to ENT services for an assessment of their vocal fold mobility.
The study is to be conducted at a single-site, specialist tertiary centre, specialising in the diagnosis, assessment, and management of neurological disorders. It will adopt a cross-sectional design and aim to capture consecutive in- and out-patients with suspected vocal fold movement impairment referred to ENT for vocal fold assessment over the course of 12 months.
The anticipated sample size is n=50 patients.
Each research participant will be assessed once. The assessment will include the following (in order):
Each assessment will take less then 10 minutes to perform.
As per usual clinical care - participants will receive a diagnosis from the ENT consultant based on the images from the FNE. They will be offered the opportunity to be contacted about the findings of the research study once data analysis is complete.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 12 months
Each participant with be assessed using i) laryngeal ultrasound (US) and ii) fibreoptic nasendoscopic examination (FNE). One ENT or SLT will pass an FNE to assess vocal fold function. Images will be interpreted by an ENT consultant blinded to the outcomes of the laryngeal US. Two blinded SLTs will capture and interpret laryngeal US images. Each SLT will be blinded to the outcomes of i) the FNE assessment and ii) their SLT peer US assessment. Vocal fold movement will be assessed using a three-point scale (0 - normal movement, 1- impaired movement, 2- no movement).
Descriptive and inferential statistics will be used to establish the sensitivity and specificity of laryngeal US in detecting an impairment of vocal fold movement impairment. A consensus agreement between the two blinded SLTs will be used to calculate the sensitivity and specificity.
Time frame: 12 months
Image acquisition scored on a binary scale (possible/not possible). Any technical or environmental factors preventing US image acquisition will be captured on a pre-determined spread sheet.
Time frame: 15 months
Inter-rater reliability of the SLT US assessors will be calculated using kappa statistic.
Time frame: 15 months
Each patient will be asked to complete a short survey about their experience of laryngeal US assessment. Quantitative data will be analysed descriptively. Qualitative data will be analysed using thematic analysis.
Time frame: 15 months
Sub-group analysis will be used to explore the accuracy and feasibility of laryngeal US according to neurological diagnosis.
Time frame: 24 months
Where additional laryngeal pathology was diagnosed on FNE, retrospective analysis of these images will be conducted alongside US images to generate hypothesis relating to the ability of US to detect other laryngeal pathology in this patient group. Findings will be descriptive.
University College, London
Other
A Feasibility Study to Investigate the Accuracy and Viability of Ultrasound in Detecting Impairments of Vocal Fold Mobility in People With Neurological Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03490539
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06352372
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Autistic Disorder
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05938452
Nervous System Diseases, Neurological Disorder
Bloomfield, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04200664
Age Related Hearing Loss, Ataxia
London, United Kingdom
View Trial Details