Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04285333

Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block for Hip Fracture

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a widely accepted anesthetic technique for hip fracture repair among elderly. Positioning for SA can be extremely painful. Effective management of pain is important for these patients comfort.

Fascia Iliaca block (FIB) and Femoral nerve blocks are commonly used for analgesia in hip fracture patients. However, they often provide a modest reduction in pain.

The Percapsular Nerve Group block (PENG Block) has the advantage that it covers the accessory obturator nerve.

Aim of the study: compare FIB with PENG prior to positioning hip fracture patients for standardized SA.

In a prospective randomized double blind we included 80 patients aged more than 65 years old, for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees. Patients were assigned to receive either ultrasound guided Fascia Iliaca block or Percapsular Nerve Group block using 20 mL Lidocaine 1.5% in both groups. We compared pain on positioning for spinal anesthesia using Verbal Rating Scale (VRS 0 = no pain , VRS 1 = mild pain, t 2= severe pain) for both groups. We also recorded different times to perfom block.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institut Kassab D'Orthopedie

Tunis, 2010, Tunisia

About this study

The purpose of the study was to compare analgesis effect of Percapsula nerve group block to fascia iliaca block prior to positioning hip fracture patients for standardized SA. We included 80 patients reporting pain with Verbal Rating Scale at 2 when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees. All patients admitted to induction room, were given standard monitoring and we randomized to receive either: ultrasound fascia iliaca block using linear high frequency ultrasound probe (10-15MHz) placed in a transverse direction over the anterior thigh below the inguinal ligament. A 50 mm needle was advanced until the tips placed underneath the fascia iliaca and 20 mL 1.5% Lidocaine was injected or ultrasound Percapsula nerve group block A curvilinear using low-frequency ultrasound probe (2-5MHz) that was initially placed in a transverse plane over the anterior inferior iliac spine and then aligned with the pubic ramus by rotating the probe counter clockwise approximately 45 degrees. In this view, the iliopubic eminence , the iliopsoas muscle and tendon, the femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were observed and than a 100 mm needle was advanced to place the tip in the musculofascial plane between the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly and 20 mL 1.5% Lidocaine.We compared pain on positioning for spinal anesthesia and also different time to realise both blocks.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • - Patients aged ≥ 65 years old and undergoing hip fracture surgical repair under continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA).
  • Patients for whom pain was felt when raising the affected limb to 15 degrees (VERBAL PAIN SCALE =2)

Exclusion criteria

  • - ASA physical status ≥ 4.
  • Impaired cognition or Dementia.
  • Multiple fractures.
  • Contraindication to regional anesthesia.
  • Patient's disapproval.

Treatment and study plan

Fascia iliaca block

Procedure

ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%

Other names: BIF for hip fracture

percapsular nerve group block

Procedure

ultrasound guided block with 20 mL lidocaine 1.5%

Other names: PENG block for hip fracture

Primary outcomes

  1. positioning pain

    Time frame: up to 30 minutes

    Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

Secondary outcomes

  1. Positioning Rating

    Time frame: up to 40 minutes

    verbal rating scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

  2. Imaging time

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

    For the PENG block:the femoral artery, the anterior inferior iliac spine, the iliopubic eminence and the psoas tendon.

    For the FIB: the femoral artery, the iliacus muscle, the fascia iliaca and the fascia lata.

  3. Puncture time

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

    the time that stretches from the introduction of the needle until the end of the injection of local anesthetic

  4. Performance time

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

    the imaging time + time to puncture.

  5. Number of punctures

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

    the number of redirection of the needle after removing 2 cm.

  6. pain 5 after block

    Time frame: up to 5 minutes

    verbal rating scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

  7. pain 10 after block

    Time frame: up to 10 minutes

    verbal rating scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

  8. pain 15 after block

    Time frame: up to 15 minutes

    verbal rating scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

  9. pain 20 after block

    Time frame: up to 20 minutes

    verbal rating scale (VRS) [0=no pain ; 4=worst pain]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Tunis El Manar

Other

Collaborators

  • Institut Kassab d'Orthopédie

Registry information

Official study title

Analgesic Techniques Before Spinal Anesthesia for Hip Fracture Repair: Ultrasound Percapsular Nerve Group Block VS Fascia Iliaca Block

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 26, 2020
Registry last updated
Feb 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.