Corniche hospital
Abu Dhabi, 3788, United Arab Emirates
NCT Number: NCT01440400
The classical method for spinal anesthesia relies on the use of bony landmarks to identify the level and point of entry of the spinal needle. Over the years, in experienced hands, this method consistently proved to be successful and safe.
The introduction of ultrasound to guide neuraxial anaesthesia into clinical practice was relatively slow compared to peripheral nerve blocks or central venous catheterization. This could be due to the technical difficulties posed by the bony structures surrounding the spinal cord and its dura that blocks the path of the ultrasound beam. Many anesthetists are reluctant to change their conventional landmark technique, particularly with most studies showing no change in the success rate between ultrasound guided and the landmark techniques.
Several studies however showed that the ultrasound guided approach reduces the number of attempts to achieve a successful block and reduces the procedure time particularly in obese patients and those with technical difficulties.
In this study the investigators are trying to answer the following question : Is there any advantage in using ultrasound to guide spinal anaesthesia in non obese obstetric patients with easily palpable bony landmarks?
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeFemale
Interventional
Not applicable
Abu Dhabi, 3788, United Arab Emirates
Patients will be randomized using a web based randomization program into two groups: Ultrasound guided spinal anesthesia (US) & conventional spinal anesthesia (C). In both groups, the level of the third or fourth lumbar inter-space (L3/4 or L4/5) will be identified using either ultrasound (transverse and longitudinal approach) or palpation method using anatomical landmarks.
All ultrasound examinations and spinal anesthesia will be performed by 3 anesthetists with experience in ultrasound guided neuraxial block (between 100 and 200 cases). The ultrasound examination will be done using Logiq e TM ultrasound machine (GE Solingen Germany) with 4C RS 2 - 5.5MHz Broadband multi-frequency probe.
The predetermined point of entry for the introducer needle will be marked on the patient's back. The spinal anaesthesia will be administered with the patient in the sitting position, using a 26 gauge pencil point needle (PortexTM) with 15 mg of heavy Bupivacaine and 20 micrograms of Fentanyl. An independent observer, who is blinded to the method used to identify the point of entry of the introducer needle, will be collecting the data.The spinal anesthesia will be labeled as successful if a bilateral block to the sixth thoracic dermatome (T6) , judged by loss of cold and touch discrimination, is established 5 minutes after the spinal injection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Using the ultrasound to identify the spinal puncture level, mid-line and the depth of the dura.
Time frame: 30 minutes
Number of times the skin is punctured by the introducer needle.
Time frame: 30 minutes
The number of times the spinal needle tip is advanced beyond the tip of the introducer needle.
Time frame: 30 minutes
From skin puncture by the introducer to viewing cerebro-spinal fluid back-flow at the hub of the spinal needle.
Time frame: 24 hours
scale 0-10, 0=not satisfied, 10=completely satisfied
Time frame: 24 hours
verbal rating scale(VRS), 0-10, 0=no pain, 10=maximum pain.
Corniche Hospital
Other
The Use of Ultrasound to Guide Spinal Anesthesia in Obstetrics. Is There an Advantage Over Landmark Technique in Non-obese Patients?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07720440
Agnosia, Behavior
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07720986
Cesarean Section
Al Mansurah, Dakhalia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07521592
Cesarean Section, Cortisol
Elâzığ, Lütfen Seçiniz., Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07712510
Blood Loss, Postoperative, Blood Loss, Surgical
Multan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details