faculty of medicine, Zagazig university
Zagazig, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT04835415
The aim of this study is to evaluate analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided retrolaminar block vs ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia in pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zagazig, Egypt
To study the difference between the effects of ultrasound-guided bilateral retrolaminar block and ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural analgesia on pain control following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. To relief pain and improve satisfaction in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Zagazig university hospitals.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
in lateral position and after skin sterilization. The spine is palpated from cervical (C7) downward toT7 and point marked to identify the spinous process. The linear high frequency transducer (6-13 MHz) will be placed parasagittal plane 1 cm lateral to the midline. The needle (18 gauge) is inserted in the plane view of the ultrasound probe to target the T7 and needle is advanced from downward to upward until the needle tip contacted the lamina. After negative aspiration, a 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25 % plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) will be injected. The procedure will be repeated following the same steps on the other side.
Other names: Ultrasound guided retrolaminar block
In the lateral position, after skin sterilization, Ultrasound with high frequency linear probe (5-13 MHz). Thoracic intervertebral space (T7-8) will be identified by counting from the C7 to prominent thoracic spine (T7). The probe will be used in parasagittal plane 2 cm from midline. The probe will be directed medially to identify the dura matter at the T7-8 intervertebral space . the needle 18 gauage will be inserted in plane to target T7-8 intervertebral space ., after needle tip reached target space, loss of resistance technique then 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25% plus 5ug/ml adrenaline (1:200000) was injected after aspiration
Other names: Ultrasound guided thoracic epidural
Time frame: 30 minutes postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 1 hour postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 2 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 4 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 6 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 8 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 10 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: at 12 hours postoperative
measured by NRS consisted of a series of numbers represents range of pain intensity (10 means the worst pain and 0 means no pain)
Time frame: within 12 hours postoperative
start from retrolaminar or epidural injection of the drug to the time of first call of naluphine
Time frame: within 12 hours postoperative
Total consumption of rescue analgesia(Naluphine) post operative
Time frame: within 24 hours postoperative
The numer of participant with complications of the techinque (dural puncture , nerve injury, spinal injection, epidural haematoma, pleural puncture)
Time frame: 24 hours postoperative
using 5-point Likert-like verbal rating scale by asking the patient about "how he/she evaluated their experience with the analgesic management after the surgery?"5=very satisfied, 4=satisfied, 3= neutral, 2= dissatisfied and 1= very dissatisfied".
Time frame: 24 hours postoperative
the number of participant with nausea (sensation of being about to vomit), vomiting (the expelling of the food content from the stomach through mouth, it will be treated by 4 mg ondansetron), hypotension (if MAP decreases more than 20% of basal reading it will be treated by 12 mg ephedrine) and bradycardia (if HR less than 50 beats/min it will be treated by 0.5 mg atropine).
Zagazig University
Other Gov
Ultrasound Guided : Retrolaminar Block Versus Thoracic Epidural Analgesia for Pain Control Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05999734
Agnosia, Analgesia
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT02471898
Agnosia, Analgesia
Pasadena, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06675916
Agnosia, Analgesia
Villeurbanne, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05250492
Agnosia, Analgesia
Lanester, France
View Trial Details