University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34186, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07528794
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of prolotherapy using 5% dextrose compared to steroid and saline injections in patients with lumbar facet joint-related low back pain. The study is designed as a randomized, double-blind clinical trial conducted in a tertiary physical medicine and rehabilitation center. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive one of the three treatments. Clinical outcomes including pain intensity, functional status, and physical performance will be assessed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. The results of this study may help determine the short-term effectiveness of prolotherapy as a treatment option for chronic low back pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Istanbul, 34186, Turkey (Türkiye)
Lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis is a significant contributor to chronic low back pain and is associated with functional limitation and reduced quality of life. Interventional treatment options such as corticosteroid injections are commonly used; however, alternative approaches such as prolotherapy have gained attention due to their potential regenerative and neuromodulatory effects.
This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial designed to compare the effectiveness of 5% dextrose prolotherapy with steroid and saline injections in patients with chronic low back pain predominantly related to lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis. A total of 60 patients with symptoms lasting at least three months and inadequate response to conservative treatment are included. Participants are randomly allocated into three groups (1:1:1) using a computer-generated block randomization method.
All participants undergo ultrasound-guided bilateral facet joint injections at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels with a standardized volume per joint. Outcome measures include pain intensity assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), functional status evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and physical performance tests such as the Fingertip-to-Floor Test, 6-Minute Walk Test, and Milgram test. Assessments are performed at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the short-term clinical effectiveness of prolotherapy compared to steroid and placebo injections in lumbar facet joint-related low back pain.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Adults aged 40-70 years Chronic low back pain lasting at least 3 months Inadequate response to at least 2 months of conservative treatment Predominantly axial low back pain aggravated by lumbar extension and rotation Absence of radicular symptoms No objective neurological deficits on physical examination
Clinical findings consistent with facet-mediated pain, including:
Localized facet joint tenderness Positive Kemp (lumbar extension-rotation) test Supportive positive Milgram test MRI evidence of lumbar facet joint osteoarthritis (L2-3 to L5-S1), including degenerative changes such as joint space narrowing, osteophytes, subchondral sclerosis, or facet hypertrophy
Exclusion criteria
Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint injection with 5% dextrose (1 mL per joint) administered bilaterally at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels (total 8 mL per participant).
Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint injection with dexamethasone phosphate (2 mg/mL, 1 mL per joint) administered bilaterally at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels (total 8 mL per participant).
Ultrasound-guided lumbar facet joint injection with 0.9% saline (1 mL per joint) administered bilaterally at L2-3, L3-4, L4-5, and L5-S1 levels (total 8 mL per participant).
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Pain intensity is assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Changes from baseline are evaluated at 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Functional disability is assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), a validated questionnaire ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability. Changes from baseline are evaluated at 1-month and 3-month follow-up visits.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Flexibility is assessed using the Fingertip-to-Floor Test, which measures the distance between the fingertips and the floor in centimeters during forward flexion. Lower values indicate better flexibility.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Physical performance is assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test, measuring the distance walked in meters over six minutes. Greater distances indicate better functional capacity.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, and 3 months
Lumbar stability is assessed using the Milgram test, which evaluates the ability to maintain bilateral leg elevation in a supine position. Improvement is defined as increased ability to maintain the position without pain.
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
Other Gov
Prolotherapy for Lumbar Facet Joint-Related Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07727525
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07694219
Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain
Lahore, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04678297
Behavior, Chronic Low Back Pain
Storrs Mansfield, Connecticut, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00887003
Chronic Low Back Pain
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details