Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT07672912

Ultrasound-Guided Hook-Wire Localization for Excision of Non-palpable Cervical Lesions Suspicious for Metastasis

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization improves surgical efficiency and accuracy compared with ultrasound-guided surgery alone for the excision of non-palpable or difficult-to-palpate cervical lesions suspicious for metastatic disease in adult patients.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Does ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization reduce operative time compared with ultrasound-guided excision alone? * Does hook-wire localization improve surgical precision, including successful retrieval of the target lesion for histopathological assessment? * Does hook-wire localization affect incision length, procedural difficulty, or the risk of surgical complications?

Researchers will compare patients undergoing ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization followed by surgical excision with patients undergoing ultrasound-guided excision alone to determine whether hook-wire guidance improves surgical outcomes.

Participants will:

* Undergo ultrasound-guided localization and surgical excision of a cervical lesion or lymph node suspicious for malignancy. * Be randomly assigned to either: ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization before surgery, or ultrasound-guided excision without hook-wire localization. * Have surgical outcomes assessed, including operative time, incision length, successful lesion retrieval, procedural difficulty, and intraoperative or postoperative complications.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Karolinska University Hospital

Stockholm, Stockholm County, 17176, Sweden

About this study

This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates whether ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization improves the surgical management of non-palpable or difficult-to-palpate cervical lesions suspicious for metastatic disease compared with ultrasound-guided surgical excision alone. The study was designed to investigate whether preoperative hook-wire localization can facilitate more efficient and accurate surgical removal of targeted cervical lesions while minimizing surgical burden.

Patients with cervical lesions or lymph nodes suspicious for malignancy based on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and/or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) findings may require surgical excision to obtain definitive histopathological diagnosis or to guide further oncological management. However, non-palpable or poorly palpable cervical lesions can be challenging to identify intraoperatively, potentially resulting in longer operative procedures, larger incisions, increased tissue dissection, and difficulties in ensuring retrieval of the intended target lesion.

Ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization is a technique in which a thin wire is placed under ultrasound guidance into or adjacent to the target lesion before surgery, providing the surgeon with a physical marker to facilitate identification and excision. This approach is widely used for localization of non-palpable breast lesions but has been less extensively evaluated for cervical lesions. The present study investigates the clinical utility of this technique in cervical surgery.

The study was conducted at Karolinska University Hospital between April 2021 and November 2025. Adult patients (≥18 years) with cervical lesions or lymph nodes suspicious for malignancy who were scheduled for surgical excision of a non-palpable or difficult-to-palpate lesion for histopathological evaluation were eligible for inclusion. Most included patients had confirmed or suspected malignancy, and excisional lymph node biopsy represented the most common surgical procedure.

A total of 51 patients were randomized using sealed opaque envelopes to either ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization followed by surgical excision or ultrasound-guided excision alone. One patient was excluded after randomization due to a protocol violation, as the procedure was planned under local anesthesia and therefore did not meet the predefined inclusion criteria. To maintain balanced study groups, one additional patient was enrolled using a duplicate allocation envelope, resulting in a final study population of 50 patients, with 25 patients allocated to each study arm.

The primary objective was to determine whether hook-wire localization reduces operative time. Operative time was defined as the interval from the initial ultrasound localization of the target lesion to completion of wound closure. Secondary objectives included evaluation of surgical accuracy and feasibility through assessment of skin incision length, successful retrieval of the intended target lesion confirmed by histopathological examination, surgeon-rated procedural difficulty, and perioperative complications.

All participants were prospectively monitored for adverse events related to the procedure and surgery, including bleeding, infection, lymphatic leakage, and neurological injury. The study aims to provide evidence regarding whether ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization can improve surgical efficiency and precision in patients undergoing excision of challenging cervical lesions while maintaining procedural safety.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged ≥18 years
  • Patients with a cervical lesion or lymph node suspicious for malignancy based on fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and/or fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET/CT) findings.
  • Patients scheduled for surgical excision in general anesthesia of a non-palpable or difficult-to-palpate cervical lesion for definitive histopathological diagnosis.
  • Patients able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients undergoing procedures planned under local anesthesia only.
  • Patients not meeting the predefined surgical criteria for excision of a target cervical lesion.
  • Patients with palpable cervical lesions suitable for direct surgical identification and excision without imaging guidance
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent.

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization

Procedure

Preoperative ultrasound-guided placement of a hook-wire into or adjacent to a non-palpable or difficult-to-palpate cervical lesion to facilitate intraoperative identification and surgical excision of the target lesion.

Ultrasound-guided surgical excision alone

Procedure

Surgical excision of the target cervical lesion using ultrasound guidance for intraoperative identification, without preoperative hook-wire localization.

Primary outcomes

  1. Operative time

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure (from ultrasound localization to wound closure)

    Operative time, defined as the time interval from initial ultrasound localization of the target cervical lesion to completion of wound closure. The outcome will be compared between participants undergoing ultrasound-guided hook-wire localization and those undergoing ultrasound-guided excision alone.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Skin incision length

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of surgery

    Length of the surgical skin incision measured at the completion of the procedure.

  2. Successful retrieval of target lesion

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks after surgical excision, when histopathology assessment is complete.

    Successful identification and removal of the intended target cervical lesion, confirmed by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen.

  3. Surgeon-rated procedural difficulty

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure.

    Assessment of procedural difficulty by the operating surgeon using a predefined evaluation scale, reporting score on a 0-5 scale. Scale title: "Overall assessment of procedural difficulty": 1=very difficult and 5= very easy.

  4. Intraoperative complications

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure.

    Occurrence of procedure-related intraoperative complications, including bleeding, injury to surrounding structures, or other adverse events occurring during surgery.

  5. Postoperative complications

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks after surgery

    Occurrence of postoperative complications, including bleeding, infection, lymphatic leakage, and neurological injury following surgical excision.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rusana Bark

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Open Lymph Node Biopsy in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Lymphoma and Non-palpable Cervical Cystic Lesions: a Clinical Study.

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 29, 2026
Registry last updated
Jul 7, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.