Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05637918

Ultrasound for Prediction of Empty Stomach in Infants

Background and Aim: Pulmonary aspiration of gastric content is a serious perioperative complication. What is known about the pediatric patient's fasting time is usually based on parental history alone, but in some situation there may be doubts about an empty stomach in young children. Ultrasound examination of the gastric antrum is increasingly used and is emerging as a valuable perioperative noninvasive tool for the indirect assessment of gastric volumes in children. The objective of this prospective study was to assess the relationship between the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the antrum measured by gastric ultrasound and gastric volumes suctioned endoscopically, also to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 24 month

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Feyza Sever

Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Protocol: This study was performed in Pediatric Gastrointestinal (GI) Endoscopy Unit after receiving Institutional Ethics Board approval. Following induction of anaesthesia, antral sonography was performed in supine and right lateral decubitus (RLD) positions in 46 fasted infants prior to upper GI endoscopic evaluation. Antral CSA measurements in both positions and the qualitative evaluation of the antrum (according to the 3-point grading system) were recorded. Grade 0: antrum appears empty in both positions. Grade 1: antrum appears empty in the supine position but a small volume of gastric clear fluid is visible in the RLD. Grade 2: antral clear fluid visualized in both the supine and RLD position. The calculation of the antral CSA was performed by measuring the longitudinal diameter (D1) and the antero-posterior diameter (D2) of the antrum at rest, between peristaltic contractions, from serosa to serosa. Cross-sectional area was calculated using the standard formula for surface area of an ellipse CSA= π x D1 x D2 / 4. Gastric contents were endoscopically suctioned and measured by a graduated specimen trap with 1 ml increments.

Sample size A sample of 23 from the positive group and 23 from the negative group achieve 80% power to detect a difference of 0,2300 between the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) under the null hypothesis of ,5000 and an AUC under the alternative hypothesis of 0,7300 using a two-sided z-test at a significance level of 0,05000. The data are continuous responses. The AUC is computed between false positive rates of 0,000 and 1,000. The ratio of the standard deviation of the responses in the negative group to the standard deviation of the responses in the positive group is 1,000.

Statistical analysis:

All statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS for Windows Version 23.0 software. Descriptive statistics for continuous variables were shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median [inter-quartile range (IQR); 25-75th percentile]. Categorical variables were shown as the number of patients and percentage (%). Whether the distributions of continuous variables were normal or not was determined by the Shapiro Wilks test. Correlations between continuous variables were given by Spearman Correlation Coefficient. Discriminative ability of the CSA was determined by ROC curve analysis. Optimal cut-off value was given by Youden index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value were calculated at this point. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Stepwise linear regression analysis was applied to estimate CSA. The variables those p values <0.20 in the univariate analysis were included in multiple regression model. The independent variables were determined as age, BMI and CSA-RLD. The adequacy of the established regression models was demonstrated by R2.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All infants (< 24 months age) undergoing elective upper GI endoscopy under general anesthesia and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I -II, were included in this study

Exclusion criteria

  • Parental refusal
  • Previous lower esophageal or gastric surgery
  • Non-adherence with the fasting regimen
  • More than 5 minutes between gastric sonography and endoscopy

Treatment and study plan

Group 1 (Patients who recorded as Grade 0)

Other

When the gastric contents were evaluated with the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, the stomach was completely empty in Group 1 that patients who recorded as Grade 0.

Group 2 ( Patients who recorded as Grade 1)

Other

When the gastric contents were evaluated with the endoscope, small volume of gastric clear fluid was visible and gastric content aspirated and measured in Group 2 that patients who recorded as Grade 1.

Primary outcomes

  1. The relationship between antral cross-sectional area and aspirated gastric volumes

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    The investigators wanted to evaluate the correlation between sonographically measured gastric antral CSA in both supine and RLD positions, and gastric volume suctioned under direct endoscopic visualization in infants between 0-24 months age.

  2. The best cut-off value of CSA for an empty antrum

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    The investigators wanted to determine the best cut-off value of CSA for a truly empty antrum in the pediatric population less than 24 months of age

Secondary outcomes

  1. A mathematical model for gastric volume estimation

    Time frame: 30 minutes

    The investigators wanted to generate a final predictive model for gastric volume estimation in infants.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Relationship Between Gastric Ultrasound Findings and Endoscopically Aspirated Volume in Infants and Determination of Antral Cut-off Value for the Diagnosis of Empty Stomach

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Dec 6, 2022
Registry last updated
Dec 14, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.