Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03890640

Ultrasound-assisted Thoracic Epidural Catheter Insertion

The aim of the present study is to access the success rate of ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion, using fluoroscopy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

20 year–79 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Asan medical center

Seoul, 05505, South Korea

About this study

Thoracic epidural anesthesia has been associated with reduced acute postoperative pain for a wide variety of surgical procedures. It has also been associated with reductions in perioperative cardiac stress, chronic post-thoracotomy pain, and improvements in postoperative pulmonary function. Although a variety of methods can be used to confirm the position of the epidural needle in the epidural space, a blind technique and fluoroscopic guided approach are a widely used method. A thoracic epidural block is a relatively more difficult procedure than procedures used in other regions, because the spinous process of the thoracic vertebra is longer than that of the lumbar vertebra, and the area through which the needle can approach the epidural space is relatively smaller due to an acute angle and larger distance between the skin and the epidural space. Therefore, the success rate of thoracic epidural intervention is only about 68% under a blind technique due to inadequate position of the needle tip, misplacement, occlusion, and migration of the catheter.

Although fluoroscopic guided thoracic epidural intervention is the safest and most accurate method to identify the correct anatomical structures and confirm the epidural space with contrast medium, its use is limited because of the difficulty of using fluoroscope and the burden of radiation exposure. As the use of ultrasound has become popularized and universal, it has been widely used in regional anesthesia and analgesia, has continuously replaced the modality such as a blind technique and fluoroscopic guidance. Ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion was also recently investigated, and then it was conducted successfully in 15 cases of thoracic and upper abdominal surgery. Moreover, it showed several advantages including lowering the number of needle passes and increasing the success rate. However, it has not yet been studied how accurately the catheter is located in the thoracic epidural space during thoracic epidural catheter insertion using real-time ultrasound. Although it is possible to speculate the success of the thoracic epidural catheterization clinically, the identification of the location of the catheter is only possible under fluoroscopic guidance. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to confirm the success rate of ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion, using fluoroscopy with contrast medium.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who will undergo upper abdomen or thoracic surgery
  • Scheduled for thoracic epidural catheter insertion
  • 20 ≤ age <80
  • When obtaining informed consent voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

  • Allergy to local anesthetics and contrast dye, and steroid
  • Use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet medication, coagulopathy
  • Infection at the insertion site
  • Neurological or psychiatric disorders
  • Prior spine instrumentation
  • Pregnancy

Treatment and study plan

Ultrasound-guided TECI

Procedure

When performing an ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion (TECI), an 18-gauge Tuohy needle will be used for interlaminar epidural access. All procedures will be performed with a paramedian approach under ultrasound-guidance and using the loss of resistance technique with saline. If the needle is deemed to be in the epidural space when the loss of resistance occurred, fluoroscopic views will be obtained to confirm which the catheter tip is located in the epidural space or not.

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion

    Time frame: on the day of the procedure

    Confirmation success of ultrasound-guided thoracic epidural catheter insertion using fluoroscopic images; success means that the catheter tip is located in the epidural space.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of skin punctures

    Time frame: on the day of the procedure

    complete needle withdrawal from the skin and reinsertion at a new location

  2. Number of needle passes

    Time frame: on the day of the procedure

    First needle pass + additional needle passes (the needle returned to a plane perpendicular to the skin before reinsertion. Needle tip maneuvers toward the midline and cephalad were considered standard needle walking technique and were counted as a single pass)

  3. First attempt success rate

    Time frame: on the day of the procedure

    only first needle pass and first skin puncture

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Asan Medical Center

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Real-time Ultrasound-assisted Thoracic Epidural Catheter Insertion: a Pilot Study

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Mar 26, 2019
Registry last updated
Jan 18, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.