Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05786742

Ultra Hypofractionnated Radiotherapy With HDR Brachytherapy Boost.

Phase 1-2 study, comparing ultra-hypofractionnated (UH) to a moderately hypofractionnated (MH) radiation therapy, with image guided HDR prostate brachytherapy. Using iso-equivalent doses, a non-inferiority analysis will be done in order to prove UH non-inferior to MH, toxicity wise. Acceptability, tolerability, acute and late toxicity will be reported. MRI visible dominant intra-prostatic lesion will be outlines and variability between radiation oncologists and radiologists will be reported. As secondary objective, biochemical and clinical failure free survival will be reported at 5 & 10 years.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–95 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Phase 1 : consists in a feasibility study (First 28 patients).

Phase 2 : monocentric prospective comparative cohort study.

Recruitment :

  • "Centre intégré de cancérologie du CHU de Québec-Université Laval."
  • Recruitment period: December 2015 to June 2023

Brachytherapy :

  • Implantation under general or spinal anesthesia
  • Foley catheter insertion in bladder.
  • TRUS prostate localisation.
  • Prostate volume measurement.
  • Gold fiducial markers (3) insertion.
  • Prostate brachytherapy catheters (14 à 21) insertion.
  • Cystoscopy for bladder and urethra integrity control.
  • Re-insertion of foley catheter after cystoscopy.

Planning imaging: TRUS or CT scan (has needed).

Structures delineation by radiation oncologist (brachytherapist).

  • Prostate
  • Seminale vesicles
  • Rectum
  • Colon sigmoïde
  • Bladder
  • Urethra
  • Penile bulb

Dosimetric optimisation

  • Oncentra Prostate v. 4.2.2 d'Elekta brachytherapy (Veenendaal, The Netherlands)
  • Oncentra Brachy version 4.6 (if under CT scan).

Treatment (brachytherapy dose delivery).

  • 15 Gy in one fraction
  • Direct interstitial dose monitoring (20 patients or more). Fiber-optic dosimeter inserted in prostate brachytherpy catheter for live dose delivery mesurements.

Foley ablation under full bladder, same day or day after therapy.

Radiotherapy:

  • Via IMRT, VMAT or SBRT technics.
  • Dose : 25 Gy in 5 fractions administered over a 7 days period. 2 to 3 fractions separated by 2 days, weekend break.
  • PTV includes prostate and the first centimeter of seminal vesicle.

Simulation

  • one week post brachytherapy
  • standard has described in the department procedure manual.
  • maximal CT scan slice thickness : 2-3mm.
  • uretro-graphy done to identify urogenital sphincter.

Multiparametric MRI

  • If no counter-indication and available,
  • a T2 tridimensional sequence for prostate delineation
  • slice thickness : 1 mm.
  • a diffusion weighted sequence will be done.
  • a DTI with tractography can be done optionally.
  • contrast media (gadolinium) is optional.

Physique

  • Linac energy (between 6 MV to 18 MV).
  • ARC therapy technique will be used
  • planification softwares: Éclipse, Pinnacle or Raystation.
  • Portal (kV-kV) imagery will be used for marker match.
  • CBCT will be done at each fraction delivered.

Clinical and dosimetric data will be collected prior treatment.

Primary objectives :

  • Toxicity analysis will be quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) at 1, 2 and 5 years post-therapy, and has needed at FU visits. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis will be used to report toxicity evolution through time.
  • median IPSS scores will be reported at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-therapy. IPSS median time to baseline return will be calculated.
  • IPSS urinary scores, sexual function (SHIM) and GI toxicity (CTCAE-v5) and quality of life questionnaires ( EPIC-26) will be given at 3, 6 months and yearly thereafter (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-treatment.

Secondary objectives : Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) recommendation will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Biopsy proven Prostate adenocarcinoma
  • Stage T1c, T2 (Annex 2)
  • Stage Nx or N0
  • Stage Mx or M0
  • PSA < 20ng/ml
  • Gleason Score 6 or 7
  • Having the ability to sing a written consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Age < 18ans
  • Clinical Stage T3 or T4
  • Stage N1
  • Stage M1
  • PSA > 20
  • Gleason Score 8 to 10
  • IPSS Score > 20 alpha-blocking medication.
  • Prior pelvic radiotherapy.
  • History of active collagenosis (Lupus, Sclerodermia, Dermatomyosis)
  • Past history of Inflammatory Bowell Disease
  • Bilateral hip prosthesis

Treatment and study plan

grade and compare reported side effects between groups

Radiation

Compare experimental ultra hypo fractionation (25 Gy in 5 daily fractions administered starting mid week and ending mid following week) to our standard fractionation (either 37,5 Gy given in 15 daily fractions, or 36 Gy in 12 daily fractions).

  • Toxicity analysis will be quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) at 1, 2 and 5 years post-therapy, and has needed at FU visits. Kaplan-Meier statistical analysis will be used to report toxicity evolution through time.
  • median IPSS scores will be reported at 3, 6, 12 months and yearly (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-therapy. IPSS median time to baseline return will be calculated.
  • IPSS urinary scores, sexual function (SHIM) and GI toxicity (CTCAE-v5) and quality of life questionnaires ( EPIC-26) will be given at 3, 6 months and yearly thereafter (1, 2, 3, 4 et 5) post-treatment.

Other names: report and compare IPSS scores, report and compare EPIC26 scores, report and compare SHIM scores, report and compare CTCAE scores, report and compare clinical outcomes

Primary outcomes

  1. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at baseline, prior treatment

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  2. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 3 months post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  3. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 6 months post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  4. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 1 year post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  5. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 2 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  6. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 3 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  7. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 4 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  8. GU toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 5 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  9. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at baseline, prior treatment

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  10. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 3 months post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  11. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 6 months post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  12. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 1 year post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  13. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 2 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  14. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 3 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  15. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 4 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  16. GI toxicity analysis (CTCAE)

    Time frame: at 5 years post-therapy

    quantitatively evaluated using CTCAE (v5) and compare between arms

  17. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at baseline, prior treatment

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at baseline, prior treatment

  18. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 3 months

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-therapy

  19. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 6 months

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-therapy

  20. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 1 year

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-therapy

  21. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 2 years

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-therapy

  22. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 3 years

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-therapy

  23. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 4 years

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-therapy

  24. urinary toxicity analysis (IPSS)

    Time frame: at 5 years

    median IPSS scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-therapy

  25. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: baseline, prior treatment

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at baseline, prior treatment

  26. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 3 months

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-treatment

  27. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 6 months

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-treatment

  28. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 1 year

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-treatment

  29. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 2 years

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-treatment

  30. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 3 years

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-treatment

  31. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 4 years

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-treatment

  32. quality of life questionnaires analysis (EPIC26)

    Time frame: at 5 years

    median EPIC26 scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-treatment

  33. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: baseline, prior treatment

    median SHIM scores will be reported at baseline prior treatment

  34. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 3 months

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 months post-treatment

  35. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 6 months

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 6 months post-treatment

  36. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 1 year

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 1 year post-treatment

  37. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 2 years

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 2 years post-treatment

  38. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 3 years

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 3 years post-treatment

  39. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 4 years

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 4 years post-treatment

  40. sexual function analysis (SHIM)

    Time frame: at 5 years

    median SHIM scores will be reported post-therapy and compare between arms at 5 years post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcomes

    Time frame: at 5 years

    Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well for disease free survival, metastasis free survival and overall survival.

  2. Clinical outcomes

    Time frame: at 10 years

    Biochemical disease-free survival has per Phoenix definition (by American Society of Radiation Oncology - ASTRO) will be reported using Kaplan-Meier analysis, as well for disease free survival, metastasis free survival and overall survival.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Andre-Guy Martin

CONTACT

[email protected]

14186915264

Josee Allard

CONTACT

[email protected]

14186915264

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CHU de Quebec-Universite Laval

Other

Registry information

Official study title

ULTRA-HYPO Fractionated (UHF) Compared to Moderate-HYPO Fractionated (MHF) Prostate IGRT With HDR Brachytherapy BOOST : A Phase 1-2 Study.

Acronym: HYPO-5

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2033
First posted
Mar 28, 2023
Registry last updated
Sep 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.