Alfried Krupp Hospital
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45131, Germany
NCT Number: NCT07175727
Two non-thermal ablation techniques approved for routine clinical practice (CE-marked) for the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation are compared in a 1:1 randomization to investigate patient data, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, 45131, Germany
Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were randomized 1:1 to undergo pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation (PFA) with either single-shot PFA (FARAPULSE) or single-tip PFA (Galvanize Therapeutics). Baseline characteristics, procedural data, effectiveness, and safety outcomes were analyzed. In each group, a subset of consecutive patients underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral lesions and was scheduled for biomarker assessment (blood sampling) to evaluate inflammation and troponin release after PFA.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
A subset of consecutive patients of each group (n=25 of each group) receives cMRI on the day after the procedure to asses silent cerebral lesions. A control cMRI is scheduled in case of positive findings.
A subset of patients of each group (n=25 of each group) received blood tests to asses inflammation and troponine release.
Time frame: 12 months follow-up
The clinical efficacy, e.g. freedom from atrial arrhythmias / atrial fibrillation is assessed by 5-7 day Holter Monitoring at 3, 6 and 12 months after the procedure. Any documented arrhythmia episode lasting >30s was calculated as failure. A three months blanking period was considered.
Time frame: 6 weeks
All peri-procedural complications were noted. In a subset of consecutive patients (n = 25 in each group), cerebral magnetic resonance tomography (cMRI) was performed on the day after the ablation procedure to assess silent cerebral lesions. In case of positive cMRI findings (e.g. silent lesion), repeat cMRI was scheduled in 6 weeks. Biomarker analyses were performed using blood samples, e.g. high-sensitive troponin release at 6, 24 and 48 hours after the ablation as a marker of myocardial injury and C-reactive proteine levels before and 24 hours after the ablation procedure to asses inflammatory response.
Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus
Other
Safety and Efficacy of New, Non-thermal Ablation Techniques for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation - A Comparison of Two Ablation Systems
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06706518
Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Madrid, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06907888
Apnea, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Conway, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07694570
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT07454317
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
View Trial Details