El-Demerdash hospital Ain shams university
Cairo, 11568, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT05141227
This study aims to compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of two-stage open reduction and internal fixation with single-stage external fixation in the treatment of comminuted tibial pilon fractures.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, 11568, Egypt
A pilon fracture ( also known as tibial plafond fractures) is a fracture of the distal end of the tibia with comminution, intra-articular extension and significant soft tissue injury.Pilon injury accounts for about 5% to 10% of all tibial fractures, and for <10% of lower extremity injuries. The incidence rate is relatively low. However, with the high incidence of high energy trauma and accidental falls, the number of comminuted fractures has increased in recent years.Among all pilon fractures, about 30% are complex pilon fractures (AO/ OTA 43C type) caused by high-energy injuries.
Most complex pilon fractures are associated with severe soft tissue injuries, making the treatment challenging. Optimal treatment of comminuted pilon fractures requires precise anatomical reduction accompanied by early functional exercise. Several methods have been advocated to manage complex pilon fractures, but an optimal fixation technique remains controversial.
In 1979, Ruedi and Allgower first reported satisfactory results with primary open reduction and internal fixation.However, many authors have noted significant complications when open reduction and internal fixation was applied to severe pilon fractures, including an infection rate as high as 55%, wound necrosis and skin sloughing. These complications arose from the internal fixation, leading many orthopaedic surgeons to choose external fixation as an alternative.
Although external fixation decreased wound necrosis and skin sloughing, high rates of pin site infection and malalignment with subsequent non-union occurred. Therefore, orthopaedic surgeons made great efforts to establish methods that provided good results and decreased postoperative complications.
With the accumulation of surgical experience and the development of surgical techniques, two-stage open reduction and internal fixation and limited internal fixation combined with external fixation were established, and these two methods are now widely advocated for the treatment of comminuted tibial pilon fractures.
Two-stage open reduction and internal fixation involves closed reduction and external fixation followed by conversion to open reduction and internal fixation after the condition of the surrounding soft tissues has improved. This technique focuses on the soft tissue condition and potentially decreases the incidence of soft tissue complications.Thus, this method is widely considered the standard of care for high-energy pilon fractures.
However, other surgeons have recommended limited internal fixation combined with external fixation for these severe fractures as an alternative to open reduction and internal fixation to reduce the risk of postoperative complications.
The CT based four-column classification has been adopted by many surgeons as a guide for the treatment of comminuted pilon fractures.
The four-column classification can be summarized as lateral column (the distal fibula), posterior column (the posterior part of the intermalleolar line with the distal tibial shaft), anterior column (the anterior part of the intermalleolar line with the distal tibial shaft) and medial column (the medial one-third of the tibial plafond with the distal tibial shaft) Till now, there's no randomized prospective controlled trials confirmed which method either two-stage open reduction and internal fixation or single-stage external fixation is superior regarding clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Two stage ORIF using initially temporary spanning fixator then conversion to plates & screws
Single stage Ex.Fix. Using illizarov & minimal fixation of the articular surface using cannulated screws through mini open approaches
Time frame: 12 months
Functional outcome will be assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) evaluation system.
The score includes I.Pain (40 point) II. Function (50 points) It's divided into 7 items
Time frame: 12 months
Accuracy of reduction in plain x Ray using burwell& charnely score It includes Anatomical reduction , fair reduction & poor reduction
Ain Shams University
Other
Two-stage Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Single-stage External Fixation for Complex Intra-articular Distal Tibial Fractures : A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06521606
Pilon Fracture
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03562364
Distal Femur Fracture, Distal Tibia Fracture
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01126398
Ankle Fracture, Ankle Fractures
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02609347
Ankle Fracture, Ankle Fractures
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
View Trial Details