Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02479425

Two Points Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

The aim of this study is to comparative the impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:

* Group 1: traditional three points rotation. * Group 2: two points rotation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

About this study

Several studies were searched the preventive measures of bed sores. Although repositioning is the mainstay in most preventive measures, there is no evidence to recommend specific turning regimen.

Aim of the study:

The aim of this study was designed to evaluate the comparative impact of the two points repositioning in lateral lying position on the right and left versus the traditional three points repositioning on the right, back, and left in the occurrence of bed sores.

Patients:

This study was conducted on 150 patients admitted to the critical care department of Alexandria Main University Hospital after obtaining an informed consent from their relatives.

The investigators excluded patients who: have active or healed bed sores.

Patients were randomly divided into two groups by allocated randomization:

  • Group 1: traditional three points rotation.
  • Group 2: two points rotation.

Methods:

The studied patients were subjected to:

Complete history taking, physical examination, primary ICU diagnosis, routine laboratory investigation and recording Glasgaw coma scale (GCS), use of sedation, vasopressors and mechanical ventilation

Patients in group 1 nursed by traditional protocol [ two hours on the right side in 30 degree lateral position, two hours on the back and two hours on the left side in 30 degree lateral position] Patients in group 2 nursed in lateral position with 30 degree two hours on the right and two hours on the left with elevation of the head of bed by 30 degree in the two groups.

both groups were monitored for bed sores incidence, timing and sites of occurence

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients admitted to critical care medicine department and expected to have long stay

Exclusion criteria

  • active or healed bed sores

Treatment and study plan

patient positioning

Procedure

positioning patients, every 2 hours, either to standard (right, back, left sides) or only to right and left sides

Primary outcomes

  1. pressure ulcer occurence

    Time frame: 21 days

    incidence

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alexandria

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Two Pints Versus Three Points Turning in Prevention of Bed Sores in Critically Ill Patients

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 24, 2015
Registry last updated
Jul 8, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.