Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00566228

Two Different Methods of Collecting Stem Cells For an Autologous Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma

RATIONALE: It is not yet known which method of stem cell collection is best for patients undergoing an autologous stem cell transplant.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is comparing two different methods of collecting stem cells in patients undergoing stem cell transplant for diffuse large cell lymphoma.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Lymphoma Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases Immune System Diseases Immunoproliferative Disorders Lymphatic Diseases Lymphoma, B-Cell Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoproliferative Disorders Neoplasms Neoplasms by Histologic Type

Age range

18 year–120 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, United States

About this study

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Determine the therapeutic effect of instrument-driven lymphocyte enrichment of the autograft absolute lymphocyte count (A-ALC) compared to "standard autograft collection" as determined by progression-free survival post-transplantation.

Secondary

  • Determine the profile of immune effector cells of the "lymphocyte enriched autograft" vs "standard autograft" and peripheral blood after autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and their impact on post- ASCT immunological reconstitution and clinical endpoints.
  • Perform quantitative and functional analysis of T, B, NK, and dendritic cells from the apheresis product and peripheral blood samples at multiple timepoints after transplantation.
  • Determine and compare the proportion of patients who are progression-free and alive at 1 and 2 years.
  • Determine the differences in overall survival between the two collection method arms.
  • Evaluate and characterize differences in transplantation outcomes (e.g., time to ALC engraftment, incidence of infection, and the CD34 count) between the two collection method arms.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to baseline International Prognostic Factor (≥ 2 factors vs < 2 factors) and PET scan findings prior to transplantation (positive vs negative). Patients receive filgrastim (G-CSF) alone or G-CSF and sargramostim (GM-CSF) daily for stem cell mobilization. Once the peripheral CD34-positive cell count reaches ≥ 10/μL, patients undergo stem cell collection. Patients are then randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms for standard autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

  • Immunologic autograft engineering: Patients' stem cells are collected according to modified Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 0.0 and RBC = 7.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis (lymphocyte enriched autograft).
  • Standard autograft collection: Patients' stem cells are collected according to standard Amicus settings (i.e., MNC OFFSET = 1.5 and RBC OFFSET = 5.0). Patients undergo ASCT IV on the day of apheresis.

Patients undergo blood sample collection periodically for immunological studies. Samples are analyzed for immunophenotyping of immune cell subsets via multicolor flow cytometry, immunoglobulin reconstitution, and functional T-cell immunity.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at day 15 post ASCT and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

  • Diagnosis of diffuse large cell lymphoma
  • Low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma transformed to diffuse large cell lymphoma allowed
  • Candidate for with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
  • Not requiring bone marrow harvest to collect stem cells
  • No chemotherapy with filgrastim ( G-CSF) or mobilization study drug (i.e., AMD3100) needed for mobilization of stem cells

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:

  • ECOG performance status 0-1
  • Cardiac and pulmonary status sufficient to undergo apheresis and stem cell transplantation
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Not pregnant or nursing
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception
  • HIV negative
  • No active uncontrolled infection requiring antibiotic treatment
  • No comorbid condition which, in view of the investigators, renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications
  • Willing to provide all research blood samples as required by the protocol

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:

  • At least 4 weeks since prior chemotherapy (rituxan is not considered chemotherapy for the purpose of this study)
  • More than 4 weeks since prior experimental therapy
  • No concurrent enrollment on another experimental protocol during the mobilization phase
  • No concurrent participation in any autologous stem cell transplantation study that is not using the standard conditioning regimens for lymphomas

Treatment and study plan

autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Procedure

Patients undergo autologous stem cell transplantation

Leukapheresis

Procedure

Stem cells collected

Primary outcomes

  1. Median Progression-free Survival

    Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause whichever came first, assessed up to 24 months post enrollment.

    Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause. Patients alive without disease progression or relapse were censored at their last disease evaluation or at their secondary primary cancer diagnosis, whichever occurred first. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node >1.0 cm in its short axis or in the sum of the products of diameters (SPD) of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm). A log rank test was used to assess whether PFS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-free Survival Rate at 1 Year

    Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to one year

    Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at one year is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node >1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).

  2. Progression-free Survival Rate at 2 Years

    Time frame: Date of infusion to disease progression, relapse, or death from any cause, up to two years

    Progression-free survival rate (percentage) at two years is defined as 100 times the number of patients who have not progressed, relapsed and/or died divided by the total number of evaluable patients in each arm. Criteria for Relapsed Disease: Appearance of any new lesion or increase by ≥50% in the size of previously involved sites, ≥50% increase in greatest diameter of any previously identified node >1.0 cm in its short axis or in the SPD of more than one node. Criteria for Progressive Disease: ≥50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously identified abnormal node or ALC for partial remissions or non-responders, Appearance of any new lesion (≥ 2x2 cm).

  3. One-year Overall Survival Rate

    Time frame: date of infusion to death from any cause, up to one year

    Overall survival (OS) was defined at the time from infusion to death from any cause. The one-year OS rate is defined as the percentage of patients who are still alive after one year. A log rank test was used to assess whether OS differed with respect to apheresis collection method.

  4. Median Time to Absolute Lymphocyte Count Engraftment

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after autologous peripheral hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

    The time to absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) engraftment will be evaluated and compared between the two arms, where time to ALC engraftment is defined as the time from transplant to the time they achieve ALC > 500.

  5. Median Number of CD34 Cells/kg Infused

    Time frame: 5 to 7 days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greater

    Five (5) to seven (7) days after patient received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor and reached a peripheral CD34 count of 10 cells/microliter or greater, stem cell collection began. Apheresis collections were to be performed daily. At least 2 x 10^6 CD34 cells/kg were to be collected. Additional collections were at the discretion of the transplantation team. The median number of CD34 cells/kg infused are reported for each arm below.

Other outcomes

  1. Evaluation and Comparison of Immunologic Recovery Within and Between the Arms by Assessing the Quantitative and Functional Immune Effector Cells (T, B, or NK Cells) From the Apheresis Product

    Time frame: Baseline

    Evaluation and comparison of immunologic recovery within and between the arms by assessing the quantitative and functional immune effector cells (T, B, or NK cells) from the apheresis product

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized, Double-Blind Phase III Clinical Trial Comparing Outcomes of Immunologic Autograft Engineering Versus Standard Autograft Collection in Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Dec 3, 2007
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.