Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07651644

Two-component Radiology-guided Autonomous Cascade Engine (TRACE)

This study employed a prospective, randomised crossover trial design to evaluate the clinical utility of the TRACE artificial intelligence system for gastric cancer T-staging. A total of 54 radiologists from tertiary and non-tertiary hospitals, including both senior and junior practitioners, were enrolled. The study aimed to investigate whether AI-assisted diagnosis could improve the diagnostic accuracy of gastric cancer T-staging compared with independent interpretation by radiologists.

All participants were required to interpret 60 contrast-enhanced CT cases sequentially, completing two readings for each case: one without AI assistance and one with AI assistance; The order of the two readings was randomised, and a one-month washout period was observed between readings to eliminate memory bias. All cases were pathologically confirmed gastric cancer cases (stages T1-T4b), and the study simultaneously recorded the physicians' T-staging diagnostic results and the time taken per case. The 60 cases per radiologist were randomly selected from a pool of 1,000 histologically confirmed gastric cancer cases, stratified by pathological T stage T1-T4b. The reference standard was postoperative pathological T stage. The primary outcome was the change in T-staging accuracy between AI-assisted reading and standard (unaided) reading.The term "prospective" in this study refers to the prospective execution of radiologist enrollment, randomization, reading procedures, and data collection.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology (Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute)

Shenyang, Liaoning, 110024, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Guoliang Zheng, doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

13322400728

About this study

The TRACE trial is a prospective, randomized, crossover, controlled study evaluating an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision system for T staging of gastric cancer based on CT images.

Background and rationale: Accurate preoperative T staging is critical for treatment planning in gastric cancer, but remains challenging due to reader variability and imaging limitations. The AI system was developed using deep learning with a large multi-center dataset to improve staging accuracy.

Study design: Eligible patients with pathologically confirmed gastric cancer will undergo preoperative contrast-enhanced CT. Each participant will be assessed twice in random order: once with AI assistance (AI arm) and once without (standard arm). A washout period will be applied between the two readings to minimize recall bias. Radiologists involved in the study are blinded to clinical and pathological reference standards.

Objective: To compare the T staging accuracy (primary outcome) between AI-assisted and standard reading, with secondary outcomes including inter-reader agreement, reading time, and diagnostic confidence.

Statistical methods: A crossover design will be used with a sample size calculated to detect a prespecified difference in overall accuracy. The primary analysis will employ a paired McNemar test or generalized estimating equation accounting for period and carryover effects. Subgroup analyses by tumor location, T category, and reader experience will be exploratory.

Data monitoring: No independent Data Monitoring Committee is required due to the low-risk nature of the diagnostic device. Adverse events related to the use of the software (e.g., workflow disruption) will be recorded and reported.

Ethics and dissemination: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute. Written informed consent (online or paper-based) will be obtained from all participants. Results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals regardless of outcome.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

(Imaging Data)

  • Contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) images of gastric cancer patients from the Liaoning Cancer Hospital;
  • Patients with a definitive postoperative pathological diagnosis of gastric cancer and a clear T-stage classification (T1-T4, including T4a and T4b);
  • Imaging data must be complete and of sufficient quality to meet diagnostic and analytical requirements, with no significant artefacts or missing key data;
  • Complete clinical and pathological information must be available to establish a diagnostic gold standard for comparison.

Physician Inclusion Criteria (Image Readers)

  • Radiologists holding a valid medical licence;
  • From the radiology department of a Grade A tertiary hospital or a non-Grade A tertiary hospital;
  • Classified as senior or junior physicians based on clinical experience;
  • Voluntarily participating in this study and completing both the non-AI-assisted and AI-assisted image interpretation tasks.

Case Exclusion Criteria

  • Severe missing imaging data or quality failing to meet analysis requirements (e.g., severe motion artefacts);
  • Lack of clear postoperative pathological T-staging results;
  • Cases not involving gastric cancer or with incomplete pathological information;
  • Cases of duplicate enrolment or inconsistent data recording.

Physician Exclusion Criteria

  • Those unable to complete all image review tasks or demonstrating severe non-compliance;
  • Those who withdraw during the study period and are unable to provide complete data for both phases of image review;
  • Those who fail to complete the AI-assisted and non-AI-assisted interpretation processes as specified.

Withdrawal Criteria

  • Physicians who voluntarily withdraw from the study for personal reasons (e.g., time, health or work commitments);
  • Physicians who fail to complete the required image review tasks or have data missing in excess of the specified threshold;
  • Cases where critical data errors are identified during subsequent verification or where pathological results cannot be traced; Data found during the study to be non-compliant with ethical or quality control requirements must be excluded.

Treatment and study plan

Utilizing the TRACE model to assist radiologists in T-staging

Diagnostic Test

AI-assisted reading: Radiologists interpret preoperative contrast-enhanced CT images for gastric cancer T staging with the support of the TRACE artificial intelligence decision system. The AI system provides a suggested T stage and relevant imaging features. The radiologist makes the final staging decision after reviewing the AI output. This intervention is used only during the AI-assisted reading session.

Washout period

Other

Participants are required to observe a washout period of at least 30 days between consecutive interventions/assessments.

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Accuracy of radiologists' interpretation of T staging

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy Change by Physician Experience Level

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Changes in diagnostic accuracy of radiologists with different experience levels before and after AI assistance.

  2. Stratified diagnostic accuracy of different T-stages

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Stratified diagnostic accuracy for different T-stages (T1-T4, including T4a and T4b).

  3. Agreement between physician diagnosis and pathological gold standard

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Agreement between radiologists' diagnostic results and the pathological gold standard (e.g., Kappa value).

  4. Agreement between AI model and physician interpretation

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Agreement analysis between AI model prediction results and radiologists' interpretations.

  5. Effect of AI assistance on reading efficiency

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Changes in average reading time for diagnosis with and without AI assistance.

Other outcomes

  1. Influence of case characteristics on AI assistance effect

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Influence of different case characteristics (e.g., tumor location, size) on the performance of AI assistance.

  2. Impact of individual physician differences on AI assistance effect

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Impact of individual differences among physicians on the performance of AI assistance.

  3. Value of AI assistance in reducing diagnostic discrepancy

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Potential value of AI assistance in reducing diagnostic differences and improving reading agreement.

  4. Impact of model probability information on physician decisions

    Time frame: Within 40 days after the first radiologist initiates image reading.

    Preliminary analysis of the impact of probability output from AI model on physician decision-making behavior.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Guoliang Zheng

CONTACT

[email protected]

13322400728

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Protocol for a Prospective Randomised Crossover Controlled Trial of the Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Decision-Making System for Gastric Cancer T-Staging (TRACE)

Acronym: TRACE

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 16, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.