Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
NCT Number: NCT01923493
The aim is to evaluate whether tuina is more effective and cost-effective than no intervention waiting list to reduce neck pain measured on a visual analogue scale in patients suffering from chronic neck pain.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Berlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
Objective: To evaluate whether tuina is more effective and cost-effective than no intervention waiting list to reduce neck pain measured on a visual analogue scale in patients suffering from chronic neck pain.
Study Design: Open single-centre randomized two-armed controlled trial. Setting: The study will be performed at a University out-patient clinic specialized in Integrative Medicine, with experience in the treatment of chronic pain.
Participants: 88 outpatients with chronic neck pain, who will be randomly allocated to two groups (tuina, or no intervention (control)).
Intervention: Patients receive either six tuina treatments within 3 weeks or no additional intervention.
Main outcome measure: The primary outcome is the mean neck pain intensity over the last seven days on a visual analogue scale (Huskisson, 1974) (VAS, 0-100 mm, 0 = no pain, 100= worst imaginable pain) after four weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients in the tuina group will receive a tuina therapy (also known as Chinese massage). A Chinese massage lasts about 20 to 30 minutes. A series of 6 sessions with 2 treatments per week is applied.
Other names: chinese massage
Patients in the no intervention waiting list group will not receive a study intervention. They will continue their respective pre-study therapy during the study period.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Time frame: 12 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Data on Resource-consumption and associated costs are planned to be derived as patient-reported information using the patient questionnaires.
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Body-Efficacy Expectation (BEE) is a scale to measure the conviction that one's body is able to deal with health-threatening factors by itself. It is a six items' scale developed in the Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
number and type of medication used
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Time frame: 4 weeks, 12 weeks
Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Other
Chronic Neck Pain: a Randomized Controlled Trial in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain Comparing Tuina vs. no Intervention Waiting List
Acronym: tuina
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07639671
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Radicular Pain
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06926738
Chronic Neck Pain, Neck Pain
Giza, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07438548
Chronic Neck Pain, Neck Pain
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07292155
Anxiety Disorders, Anxiety and Depression
Yozgat, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details