Carbo/cyclo
DrugOther names: Carboplatin, Cyclophosphamide
NCT Number: NCT01898117
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a difficult to treat molecular subtype with a poor survival. TNBC can be divided into at least two molecular entities; BRCA-like and non-BRCA-like. In this trial we would like to investigate whether a molecular subgroup exists within TNBCs that derives a benefit from atezolizumab added to first line chemotherapy.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
MCA, Alkmaar, Netherlands
Atezolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets human programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has shown activity in TNBC. Early clinical trials with anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy have shown that the median duration to response in TNBC is remarkably long (18 weeks) compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Since advanced TNBC is characterized by rapid disease progression, most patients with TNBC may not have the opportunity to derive benefit from immunotherapy. We hypothesize that by combining atezolizumab with paclitaxel or carboplatin-cyclophosphamide the desired rapid tumor control will be obtained with chemotherapy and subsequently atezolizumab can result in durable responses in a significant subset of patients. It is unknown whether addition of atezolizumab to first line chemotherapy in TNBC is more beneficial than adding this antibody to a second line treatment schedule. Because of this and because of the poor outcome of patients with advanced TNBC experiencing disease progression after first line palliative chemotherapy, patients who were randomized to a chemotherapy only arm in this study will be offered the opportunity to cross over to the other chemotherapy regimen plus atezolizumab at disease progression.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
> calculated (Cockcroft-Gault) or measured creatinine clearance > 50 mL/min
Exclusion criteria
futher criteria, see protocol
Other names: Carboplatin, Cyclophosphamide
Other names: Carboplatin, Cyclophosphamide, Atezolizumab
Other names: Paclitaxel, Atezolizumab
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
Validate the BRCA1-like test in predicting differential PFS with first line alkylating and platinum agents (+/- antibody add-on) when compared to paclitaxel (+/- antibody add-on) in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Compare the overal survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response (DOR) between the groups
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Compare the overal survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and duration of response (DOR) between the groups
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
Determine whether atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy will result in more objective responses and a higher proportion of patients who are free of progression at 6 months and at 12 months
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Analyze whether PD-L1 status (immunohistochemistry) in tumor infiltrating immune cells predicts for potential differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Analyze whether intratumoral CD8 and/or tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) predict for differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Evaluate whether an alkylating-platinum regimen is more effective than paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy regarding PFS in BRCA1-like TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Evaluate whether an alkylating-platinum regimen is more effective than paclitaxel as first line chemotherapy regarding PFS in non BRCA1-like TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
define whether different TNBC molecular subtypes- based on RNA -expression analysis - predict for differential PFS benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
define whether pretreatment LDH level predicts for differential benefit of atezolizumab added to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for objective response gain of the addition of atezolizumab to first line chemotherapy; e.g PD-L1, intratumoral CD8, TILs and pre-treatment LDH
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain of carboplatin-cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel chemotherapy
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 120 months
Define predictive biomarkers for PFS gain of addition of atezo lizumab to first line palliative chemotherapy in TNBC
Time frame: At 6 and 12 months and up to 120 months
Determine the PFS and objective response after cross over to the other chemotherapy regimen with atezolizumab (PFS2)
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
proportion of patients that is free of progression at 6 months and at 12 months after cross-over to the other chemotherapy regimen with atezolizumab
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Evaluate whether addition of atezolizumab to chemotherapy in first line is more beneficial than when added in second line
Time frame: assessed up to 120 months
Evaluation of overall survival (OS) for all (sub)group comparisons as pre-specified
Time frame: Assessed at 1 year
Adverse events will be graded according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria version 4.03
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Evaluate preliminary efficacy by PFS and OS in subgroups of patients treated before amendment 3 with carboplatin/cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab
Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or date of death, which ever comes first, assessed up to 120 months
Determine whether an alkylating platinum regimen is more effective then paclitaxel regarding PFS in BRCA like TNBC
Time frame: Assessed up to 120 months
Evaluate putative predictive potential of BRCA1-like status in various subgroups defined by treatment regimen received before amendment 3.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Other
Biomarker Discovery Randomized Phase IIb Trial With Carboplatin-cyclophosphamide Versus Paclitaxel With or Without Atezolizumab as First-line Treatment in Advanced Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Acronym: Triple-B
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06247995
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02414269
Adenoma, Breast Cancer
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06533059
Adnexal Diseases, Advanced Solid Tumor
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00929214
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial Details