1. Eastern Mediterranean University Health Sciences Faculty, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation,
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT03500861
In this double-blind randomized trial, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling in patients with chronic tension type headache (CTTH) in reduction of headache frequency, intensity, duration, and improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).A total of 160 CTTH patients participated in this double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial. The patients received dry needling using sterile stainless-steel acupuncture needles of 0.25x40 mm and 0.25x 25 mm dimensions three times a week for 2 weeks. The primary outcome measurement which was the headache intensity and, the secondary outcome measurements which were the headache frequency and duration were collected using a headache diary before and after treatment. Another secondary outcome measurement which was the health related quality of life was measured before treatment and at the end of the 1-month follow-up period. HRQoL assessments of patients were performed using Short Form-36 (SF-36). In the dry needling (DN) group, both the primary outcome measurements and the scores of SF-36 subscales were significantly improved after treatment. In the DN group, all effect sizes for headache variables were large. The results of this clinical trial suggest that trigger point dry needling in patients with CTTH is effective and safe in reduction of headache frequency, intensity, duration, and increasing health-related quality of life.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
According to the 2013 Global Burden of Disease study, recurrent tension-type headache is the second most common chronic disease worldwide, with an age-standardized prevalence of 21.75 % (1). Although high prevalence of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH) has been reported in all world regions, it is also the most neglected disorder and it leads to headaches that are difficult to treat (2). Myofascial pain can play an important etiologic role. It has been claimed that pain from pericranial head, neck and shoulder muscles is associated with the head and experienced as headache (5, 6). Within the cervical musculature, there are several head and neck muscles, eg. temporal, masseter, upper trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, temporalis, sub-occipital muscles, from which trigger points (TrPs) spread referred pain to the head (6). There are several pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies for patients with CTTH. Physiotherapy is the most commonly used non-pharmacological treatment of CTTH. Although sports and orthopedic physiotherapists have used dry needling (DN) for a long time to address the pain and dysfunction associated with myofascial trigger points (11), there is insufficient evidence to strongly advocate for use of DN for treatment of CTTH (12). In this double-blind randomized trial, we aimed to explore the effectiveness of trigger point dry needling in patients with CTTH in reduction of headache frequency, intensity, duration, and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The trigger point DN procedure was performed by a certified physiotherapist. While the patient was sitting, the therapist firstly cleaned the area with alcohol. Then, DN was applied into the active TrPs on the basis of the technique described by Hong (19). The needle remained in the trigger points for 20 minutes. Upon removal of the needle, the area was compressed firmly with a cotton swab for 60 secs. The DN procedure used sterile stainless-steel acupuncture needles of 0.25x40 mm and 0.25x 25 mm dimensions (Hua Long ®). DN was applied three times a week for 2 weeks, in previously diagnosed active trigger points located in the musculature of the head and the neck.
the Sham Dry Needling procedure was applied into the adipose tissue located at any area where an active TrPs was absent.
Other names: Sham Dry Needling
Time frame: Change from baseline headache intensity at the end of 2 weeks and at the end of the 1-month follow-up period.
On the diary, patients registered the headache intensity, Headache intensity was evaluated using a 10-cm horizontal Visual Analog Scale (cm), (VAS; range: 0 = no pain and 10 = maximum pain)
Time frame: Change from baseline headache frequency at the end of 2 weeks and at the end of the 1-month follow-up period.
On the diary, patients registered the frequency of headaches (days per week)
Time frame: Change from baseline headache duration at the end of 2 weeks and at the end of the 1-month follow-up period.
On the diary, patients registered the duration of each headache attack (hours per day).
Time frame: Change from baseline assessment at the end of the 1-month follow-up period.
The health related quality of life assessments of patients were performed using the Turkish version of Short Form-36. It includes eight multi-item scales containing between 2 and 10 items each, plus a single item to compare current health with a person's health 1 year ago (health transition). The scales cover the dimensions of physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (P), general health (GH), vitality (V), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). All items pertaining to each scale (excluding health transition) are summed and transformed to form a scale from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a better state of health or well-being.
Eastern Mediterranean University
Other
A Randomized Trial of Trigger Point Dry Needling Versus Sham Needling for Chronic Tension-Type Headache
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04867967
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04857671
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Namsos, Norway
View Trial DetailsNCT06604637
Brain Diseases, Central Nervous System Diseases
Bitlis, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06155669
Agnosia, Analgesia
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details