Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell
DeviceTrident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell
NCT Number: NCT00535626
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a hip implant system used when a previous hip replacement surgery has failed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–85 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Orthopedic Specialty Institute, Orange, California, United States
Total hip replacement is considered to be a very successful surgical procedure for the treatment of degenerative joint disease. Clinical results for cementless acetabular components have demonstrated excellent long-term fixation of these devices. However, so called 'first generation' cementless acetabular components have not had similar success rates. In these cases the acetabular component is often revised due to loosening, wear or infection.
Revision hip arthroplasty also becomes a challenge as patients often present with severe bone loss and poor bone quality. This can lead to compromised initial stability, which in turn leads to lack of long-term fixation and failure. Acetabular revision with a cementless component has shown improved results over cemented fixation.
Radiographic evaluation of the Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell will provide valuable early to intermediate information that may help predict the long-term success of this new system.
It is the intention of this study to closely follow subjects that have undergone revision hip replacement with regard to implant survivorship, signs of radiographic loosening, subjects' function evaluated through Harris Hip Score and Lower Extremity Activity Scale, subject quality of life through SF-36 and adverse events.
The primary efficacy hypothesis is that the rate of revision or pending revision (as defined by radiographic parameters) due to instability or lack of fixation for the Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell will be less than 10% at 5 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Trident® Tritanium™ Acetabular Shell
Time frame: 5 years post-operative
Time frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in HHS is reported by comparing the mean pre-operative, 3-month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year post-operative scores. Scores can range from 0 to 100, with 0 being the worst and 100 being the best score. 90-100 = excellent, 80-89 = good, 70-79 = fair, 0-69 = poor.
Time frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in SF-36 is reported by comparing the mean preoperative, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year scores. The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36 item patient-completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
Time frame: 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Defined as a lucent area seen parallel and in close proximity to the device at the prosthesis/bone interface encompassing at least 50% of the zone, and at least 1 mm or greater in width. May be accompanied by a radiopaque (reactive) line. Assessed for each of the three modified DeLee Charnley zones.
Time frame: 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Defined as the measurable change in the acetabular shell position relative to reproducible bony landmarks.
Time frame: pre-op, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
The change in LEAS is reported by comparing the mean pre-operative, 3 month, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year scores. The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level.
Stryker Orthopaedics
Industry
A Post-market, Non-randomized, Open Label, Multi-center Clinical Study of the Trident Tritanium Acetabular Shell
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06102811
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07431138
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Postoperative Evaluation
Ankara, Yenimahalle, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02520544
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Antwerp, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07124819
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Bryansk, Russia
View Trial Details