Triathlon TS Knee System
DeviceTotal knee replacement for revision cases
NCT Number: NCT00958789
This study will be a prospective, non-randomized evaluation of the change between preoperative and postoperative outcomes for those receiving the Triathlon® TS Total Knee System for a revision knee operation. The mean total Knee Society Score (for pain, motion and function) change is not 10% worse than, or is superior to, the expected change according to published revision total knee replacement data, for cases implanted with the Triathlon® TS Total Knee System as compared from preoperative to 2 years postoperative.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The CORE Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Total knee replacement for revision cases
Time frame: pre-op, 2 years
KSS Pain score, KSS Function score, Total Combined KSS
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
Additionally, the KSS Pain subscore and KSS Function subscore are added together to obtain a total combined score (minimum score 0, maximum score 200).
Time frame: 2 years, 5 years
This outcome measure shows the results of the KSS Functional Score for the groupings of the Joint Line Restoration (JLR). The 2 groups of JLR were stratified by the amount in mm that the joint line was restored to the physiological joint line postoperative. One group was those that were restored to ≤ 5 mm and the other was those that were restored to > 5mm.
The Functional Score of the Knee Society Clinical Rating System ranges from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. It is based on points assigned to ability to walk, climb stairs and the use of ambulatory aids. A higher value represents a better outcome.
Time frame: 2 year and 5 year postoperative
Measures the knee stability results for the groupings of the Joint Line Restoration (JLR). The 2 groups of JLR were stratified by amount in mm that the joint line was restored to physiological joint line postoperative. One group were restored to ≤ 5 mm and the other were restored to > 5mm. Knee stability is evaluated in the anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) planes.
AP drawer test determines instability in mm of the tibia. It was done in the AP plane in both JLR groupings (≤ 5mm and > 5mm) at 2 years and 5 years. The AP measurements were sub categorized into 5mm and 5-10mm.
ML is tested with a varus valgus stress test to determine any instability as measured in degrees. The ML measurements were done in both JLR groupings (≤ 5mm and > 5mm) at 2 years and 5 years with all results in only one category of < 5 degrees.
The higher the number of degrees or mm measured the more instability in the knee.
Time frame: 2 year and 5 year postoperative
Measures the presence or absence of anterior knee pain in the groupings of the Joint Line Restoration (JLR). The 2 groups of JLR were stratified by the amount in mm that the joint line was restored to the physiological joint line postoperative. One group was those that were restored to ≤ 5 mm and the other was those that were restored to > 5mm.
Anterior knee pain is determined by clinical examination with patient and clinician whether it is present or absent.
Time frame: pre-op, 1, 2, 5 years
The SF-36 Health Survey is a 36-item patient completed questionnaire to measure general health and well-being. It includes a physical and mental status component score; each ranging from 0-100. Low values represent a poor health state and high values represent a good health state.
Time frame: 1, 2, 5 years
The scoring system was based on the Knee Society guidelines and determined by measuring the width of the radiolucent lines for each of the zones of the implant components in millimeters.
The total widths are added for each zone which produces a numerical score. Radiolucency in at least 50% of a zone and measuring at least 1 mm in width is defined as radiolucency present. Failure is defined as a score of 10 or greater, regardless of symptoms and considered as radiographic instability.
Time frame: 5 years
Revision was defined as the removal of either the femoral component or the tibial baseplate component.
Time frame: pre-op, 1, 2, 5 years
KOOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport/Rec) and knee related Quality of life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Time frame: pre-op, 1, 2, 5 years
The HSS Patella Score incorporates both subjective symptoms and objective data specific to the patellofemoral joint. It consists of one score from 0-100 with a score of 100 indicating no pain, no functional limitations, no tenderness or crepitus and normal quadriceps strength.
Time frame: pre-op, 1, 2, 5 years
The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level.
Time frame: pre-op, 1,2, 5 year
The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, ROM and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.
Stryker Orthopaedics
Industry
A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Total Stabilizer (TS) Total Knee System
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04828083
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Total Knee Arthroplasty
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03965897
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07231692
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Neurologic Manifestations
Karabük, Karabük Province, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07124819
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
Bryansk, Russia
View Trial Details