Fezolinetant
DrugOral Capsule
Other names: ESN364, ASP2693
NCT Number: NCT05419908
The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes in early postmenopausal women suffering from hot flashes, in terms of changes in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 12.
This study also evaluated the effect of ESN364 on the severity and frequency of hot flashes at additional timepoints; hot flash interference on daily life, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS); the effect of ESN364 on climacteric symptoms, in terms of changes from baseline over time in Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ), Greene Climacteric Scale (GCS), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS); pharmacodynamic (PD) effect; and safety and tolerability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–65 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Site BE32004, Brussels, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral Capsule
Other names: ESN364, ASP2693
Oral Capsule
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF Severity Score by method 1 takes into account the number and severity of moderate and severe HF occurred during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]/(number of moderate HF + number of severe HF)
The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF Severity Score by method 2 takes into account moderate and severe HF during a given time period and was calculated as follows HF Severity score = [(number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)]
The severity of HFs was clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency was calculated as number of mild, moderate and severe hot flashes over the week.
Higher number of hot flashes is worse.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HFs is clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HF score (based on severity and frequency) was calculated as:
(number of mild HF/day × 1) + (number of moderate HF/day × 2) + (number of severe HF/day × 3)
The severity of HF is clinically defined as follows:
Higher scores indicate worse symptoms. There is no maximum score since the score was participant-dependent for both number and severity.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The weekly HF frequency of moderate and severe HF was calculated as number of moderate and severe HF over the week.
Higher number of HF indicates worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The HFRDIS was a 10-item scale which measured a woman's perceptions of the degree to which HF interfere with 9 daily life activities (work, social activities, leisure, sleep, mood, concentration, relations with others, sexuality, enjoying life); the 10th item measures interference with overall quality of life. This scale was modeled after items on the Brief Pain Inventory and Brief Fatigue Inventory both of which assessed the extent to which pain or fatigue interfere with daily life. Participants were asked to rate the extent to which HF had interfered with each item during the previous 4-week time interval using a 0 (do not interfere) to 10 (completely interfere) scale. Overall mean score was calculated as sum of items/number of available items. Higher score indicate a higher interference.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The LSEQ was a 10-item self-rated questionnaire which assessed participants aspects of sleep and early morning behavior. The questions were grouped into 4 chronological areas: the ease of getting to sleep, the perceived quality of sleep, the ease of awaking from sleep, and the integrity of early morning behavior following wakefulness. The LSEQ was a visual analogue scale which requires respondents to place marks on a group of 10 cm lines. representing the changes they have experienced in a variety of symptoms since the beginning of treatment. Lines extends between extremes like "more difficult than usual" and "easier than usual". Responses are measured using a 100-mm scale and are averaged to provide a score for each domain.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The GCS was a 21-item scale which provides a brief but comprehensive and valid measure of climacteric symptomatology. Each item was rated by the participant according to its severity using a four-point rating scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The first 20 items of the scale combine into three main independent symptom measures: psychological symptoms (items 1 to 11; score 0 to 33), physical symptoms (items 12 to 18; score 0 to 21), and vasomotor symptoms (items 19 to 20; score 0 to 6), by summing up the individual item scores. Item 21 is a probe for sexual dysfunction (Loss of interest in sex). The total score ranges from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms on a 10-point visual analog scale. The 3 items could be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired).Higher scores indicate significant functional impairment.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8 and 12
The SDS was a composite of 3 self-rated items designed to measure the extent to which 3 major sectors in a participant's life are impaired by panic, anxiety, phobic, or depressive symptoms. The participant rates the extent to which his/her 1- work/school, 2- social life, and 3- family life are impaired by his/her symptoms. In addition to the 3 items, the participants were asked two questions Days Lost: On how many days in the last week did your symptoms cause you to miss school or work or leave you unable to carry out your normal daily responsibilities? Day Unproductive: On how many days in the last week did you feel so impaired by your symptoms, that even though you went to school or work, your productivity was reduced?
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12: 3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of LH was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of FSH was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of E2 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of SHBG was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of leptin was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of insulin was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4: pre-dose, week 8:pre-dose, week 12:pre-dose, week 12:3h, follow-up (week 15)
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of C-peptide was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change From baseline in plasma concentration of HBA1C was reported.
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until end of the study (Up to week 15)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug, & which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom or disease temporally associated with use of a medicinal product (mp) whether or not considered related to the mp. An AE is considered "serious" if it results in death, is life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, results in congenital anomaly or birth defect, requires inparticipant hospitalization or leads to prolongation of hospitalization, hospitalization for treatment/observation/examination caused by AE is to be considered as serious, discontinuation due to increases in liver enzymes, other medically important events. TEAE was defined as an AE observed from first dose date up to end of study.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in plasma concentration of BALP was reported.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in plasma concentration of CTX was reported.
Ogeda S.A.
Industry
Pilot/Phase IIa Trial to Investigate the Effect of ESN364 in Early Postmenopausal Women Suffering From Hot Flashes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07695051
Hot Flashes, Menopause
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06049797
Hot Flashes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06206421
Hot Flashes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
View Trial DetailsNCT06812754
Hot Flashes, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details