CAPRISA
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa
NCT Number: NCT01387022
The HIV/AIDS pandemic remains among the investigators greatest public health challenges. In the absence of an effective vaccine, focus has shifted to other prevention strategies such as pre-exposure prophylaxis. Tenofovir, with potent activity against retroviruses [1], was developed for oral use as Viread®, which is widely used for HIV treatment. The efficacy of Viread® has been demonstrated in treatment-experienced and naïve patients [2,3]. In antiretroviral-naive patients, the combination of tenofovir with lamivudine and efavirenz has been classified as a preferred regimen in the Department of Health and Human Services treatment guidelines[4], and has been adopted by the South African Department of health as the first line regimen in treatment-naïve HIV infected patients since April 2010. The durability of antiviral response, favourable resistance profile, once daily dosing, and excellent long term safety profile of tenofovir [5], makes this drug an attractive option in both treatment and prevention regimens and its long half-life [6], made it an ideal choice as the first antiretroviral drug to be formulated as a microbicide gel.
The CAPRISA 004 study conducted in South Africa which tested the effectiveness and safety of 1% tenofovir gel showed that the use of tenofovir in a gel formulation reduced HIV acquisition by 39% overall, and by 54% in women with high gel adherence [7]. There have been concerns raised regarding the use of tenofovir in both PrEP and treatment regimens due to the potential for selection of viral mutations and development of resistance in patients who have become HIV-infected while on PrEP.
There have been no studies conducted to determine whether using tenofovir in pre-exposure prophylaxis affects treatment outcomes in patients who later use tenofovir, which is part of the first line ART of South Africa.
This study aims to determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa
Purpose:
To determine whether prophylactic exposure to tenofovir gel alters the therapeutic response to a tenofovir containing antiretroviral regimen
Study design:
Open label, two-arm, randomised controlled trial
Study population:
Women who become infected with HIV while participating in the CAPRISA 004 and CAPRISA 008 trials. There are 3 study populations:
Study population 1:
HIV positive women from the CAPRISA 004 tenofovir gel arm and HIV positive women from the clinical trial tenofovir gel provision arm of CAPRISA 008
Study population 2:
HIV positive women in the placebo arm of CAPRISA 004
Study population 3:
HIV positive women from the family planning service arm of CAPRISA 008
Study sites:
CAPRISA eThekwini and CAPRISA Vulindlela clinics.
Study duration:
3 years
Study intervention:
Enrolled women will be initiated on their assigned antiretroviral therapy regimen when they reach any of the following criteria:
At enrolment women in each of the three study populations will be assigned randomly to one of the two following antiretroviral regimens Intervention Arm: Tenofovir, lamivudine and efavirenz Control arm: Zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz
Sample size: The projected sample size is 90 women. The number of women in each stratum is as follows:
Study population 1: n = 40 Study population 2: n = 30 Study population 3: n = 20
Primary endpoint:
The primary endpoint is the antiretroviral treatment failure rate at 12 months. Treatment failure is defined as viral load > 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death
Secondary Endpoints:
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Tenofovir, 300mg daily, lifelong Lamivudine, 300mg daily, lifelong Efavirenz, 600mg daily, lifelong
Time frame: 12 months post ART intiation or until time of death
Treatment failure is defined as viral load > 50 copies/ml, antiretroviral regimen changes for treatment failure or death
Time frame: Measured at 12 months post ART initiation
Difference between 12 months and randomisation CD4+ count was calculated and then summarised
Time frame: From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death
Time frame: From randomisation until either time of termination or time of death
Time frame: 3 years
We will assess whether exposure to tenofovir gel at the time of HIV acquisition alters the subsequent humoral and cellular immune responses following antiretroviral treatment initiation
Time frame: 3 years
Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa
Network
Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Impact of Prophylactic Exposure to Tenofovir Gel on the Efficacy of Subsequent Tenofovir-containing Antiretroviral Therapy on Viral Suppression
Acronym: TOAST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.