Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07105930

Trial to Assess Non-inferiority of an Orbital Atherectomy Only Versus a Calcium-tailored Debulking Approach

Some patients with coronary artery disease have severely calcified vessels. In these cases, placing a stent - a small tube that helps keep the artery open - can be very difficult. Calcium build-up in the artery wall may prevent the stent from expanding properly, increasing the risk of complications or failure of the treatment.

To prepare these vessels before stenting, doctors use special techniques to modify or remove the calcium. These techniques are known as plaque modification strategies and can include devices such as atherectomy systems, scoring balloons, or intravascular lithotripsy. However, there is no clear standard as to which strategy is best.

Purpose of the Study:

This study compares two different approaches to treating calcified coronary arteries before stenting:

* A uniform approach using only the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®, Abbott), which sands away the calcium with a rotating crown * A tailored approach, where the operator chooses from various available methods (e.g., rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloons, or shockwave therapy) based on the patient's specific type of calcium The goal is to determine whether the uniform orbital atherectomy approach is not worse (non-inferior) than the individualized method when it comes to how well the stent expands inside the artery.

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups.

Randomization ensures fair comparison between both groups. The decision to implant a stent and to use additional techniques is at the discretion of the interventional cardiologist.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universitäres Herz - und Gefäßzentrum, Unversitätsklinikum Frankfurt

Frankfurt, Germany

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Marco Ochs, PD Dr. med.

CONTACT

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 Years
  • Chronic coronary syndrome with a clinical indication for percutaneous coronary intervention of a severely calcified lesion as defined by coronary computer tomography (CT; Agatston Score of target lesion ≥453 OR Calcium Arc >270°). The determination of calcification in the target lesion is based on native and contrast enhanced CT scans that are conducted as per clinical guidelines. The CT images must not be older than 6 months at the time of patient enrollment.
  • Signed informed consent
  • The patient is an appropriate candidate for bypass surgery, angioplasty, or atherectomy therapy

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (STE-ACS) within 48 hours
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Chronic total occlusion of the target lesion
  • Glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2
  • Known presence, at the time of enrollment, of any contraindications listed in the Instructions for Use (IFU) of the investigational device:
  • The OCT (optical coherence tomography) imaging catheter cannot cross
  • The wire or imaging catheter cannot cross
  • The target lesion is within a bypass graft or stent
  • The patient is not an appropriate candidate for bypass surgery, angioplasty, or atherectomy therapy.
  • The patient has angiographic evidence of thrombus
  • The patient has only one open coronary vessel
  • The patient has angiographic evidence of flow reducing dissection at the treatment site
  • The patient has a known hypersensitivity to egg-, soy-, or peanut protein or to any of the active substances or excipients of the ViperSlide™ lubricant
  • Pregnancy (assessed by clinical routine testing)
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial

Treatment and study plan

Debulging approach using the orbital atherectomy system

Device

A uniform approach using only the orbital atherectomy system (Diamondback 360®), which sands away the calcium with a rotating crown

Debulging using rotational atherectomy, scoring or cutting balloons, or shockwave therapy

Procedure

A tailored approach, where the operator chooses from various available methods based on the patient's specific type of calcium

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-procedural Minimal Stent Area (MSA %) as assessed by optical coherence to-mography (OCT) imaging

    Time frame: MSA will be assessed in the final OCT run performed after stent implantation withine baseline

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jelena Weller

CONTACT

Marcel Kunadt, Dr.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+49 621 59577 223

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Multicentric Trial to Assess Non-inferiority of an Orbital Atherectomy Only Versus a Calcium-tailored Debulking Approach

Acronym: OrFitA

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Aug 6, 2025
Registry last updated
Mar 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.