Texas A&M University College of Dentistry
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
NCT Number: NCT03219034
This study will compare the effectiveness of the two leading oral appliances (OAs) designs for the treatment of severe obstructive sleep apnea in overweight adults. The effectiveness of OAs has come under question since different designs are combined in evaluating treatment efficacy, for example when comparing them to continuous positive airway pressure Due to the wide range of reported efficacy (53 to 90%), it is of great value to identify the most effective design to guide sleep practitioners and patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
The two prominent oral appliances used in treating obstructive sleep apnea differ in their designs, mid-line traction versus bilateral thrust. From a clinical perspective, it is important to know which design is superior and should be the 'treatment of choice' for improving airway function and sleep quality. These two designs differ in their protrusive mechanisms that are categorized in general under four main types: bilateral compression, bilateral thrust, midline compression and mid-line traction. Although the two designs considered in this proposal have undergone the most rigorous testing individually, well controlled 'head-to-head' trials as proposed here have not been conducted to determine their efficacy within a single test population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible. 1 week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs.
Other names: "TAP1" Oral Appliance; washout; "SomnoDent Flex"
Anti-snoring intra-oral appliance B that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth uses a Bilateral Thrust Mechanism to advance the mandible. The trays are engaged by means of adjustable lugs. 1-week washout followed by anti-snoring intra-oral appliance A that consists of two custom fitted trays which fit over the upper and lower teeth and uses a Midline Traction Mechanism to advance the mandible. The coupling mechanism is located at a single point midline, allows adjustment by incremental protraction (advancement) of the mandible.
Other names: "SomnoDent Flex"; washout; "TAP1"
Time frame: 4 weeks
Number of apneas and hypopneas (respiratory events) per hour of recording; REI was reported instead of AHI, as it is a more appropriate measure for home sleep testing.
Time frame: 4 weeks
Percent of stable sleep during the recording, specifically the percentage of high frequency coupling (HFC%) from cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) Analysis
Texas A&M University
Other
Mid-line Traction Versus Bilateral Thrust Oral Appliances: A Trial to Determine Superiority for Improving Upper Airway Function and Sleep Quality
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04141891
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Aortic Stenosis, Subvalvular
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05582070
Airway Obstruction, Apnea
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07521319
Apnea, Comorbid Insomnia and Sleep Apnea
View Trial DetailsNCT04950894
Apnea, Apnea+Hypopnea
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details