Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02597673

Trial of Self-managed Approaches for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Active Duty

The overall objective of this project is to compare the three home-managed treatment regimens for PFPS: neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), and NMES combined with TENS to a standard home exercise program (HEP). Each of the three treatment arms will be supplemented by HEP and compared to a group receiving standard HEP alone. The central hypothesis is that the combination of NMES with TENS will show significantly greater improvements in muscle strength, mobility, pain, daily activity and quality of life (QOL) than HEP alone.

The investigators are examining: 1) whether the three treatment regimens are significantly more efficacious than standard HEP alone in improving lower extremity muscle strength, physical activity, mobility, pain, and quality of life; 2) lower extremity muscle strength, physical activity, mobility, pain, and quality of life differ significantly across the 4 time periods; 3) is there an interaction between treatment and time in relation to lower extremity muscle strength, physical activity, mobility, pain, and quality of life.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–45 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Blanchfield Army Community Hospital

Fort Campbell North, Kentucky, 42223, United States

About this study

Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS) is the most common diagnosis among active duty military presenting with knee pain in the military ambulatory care setting. The incidence of PFPS has shown a striking increase of >11.3% over the last 4 years, affecting work performance, limiting activity, and impacting military deployment health. The investigators have shown that home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is safe, portable, easy-to-use and improves quadriceps muscle strength with some pain relief. NMES and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) devices are widely used by warfighters in the theatre of operation for knee problems. The overall objective of this project is to compare three home-managed treatment regimens for PFPS: NMES, TENS, and NMES combined with TENS to a standard home exercise program (HEP). The central hypothesis is that the combination of NMES with TENS will show significantly greater improvements in muscle strength, mobility, pain, daily activity and quality of life (QOL) than HEP alone. The rationale for this study is that increasing muscle strength and decreasing pain will significantly improve mobility, physical activity and QOL. Such outcomes will ultimately result in improved deployability, retention of military personnel and decreased economic costs in this population. The specific aims are to determine whether the three treatment regimens are significantly more efficacious than standard HEP for improving muscle strength, physical activity, mobility, QOL and symptoms of PFPS including pain. After consent and baseline testing, the investigators will randomly assign active duty male and female subjects, ages 18 to <45, (n=136) with PFPS to one of the four groups. Each of the three treatment arms will be supplemented by HEP and compared to a group receiving standard HEP alone. All groups will receive 9 weeks of home therapy. Using GEE methods, the investigators will build longitudinal regression models so that differences in time trends for the outcome variables among controls and those in the treatment groups can be statistically assessed. Positive results could translate into accelerated rehabilitation, decreased symptoms and lower medical costs with better patient outcomes.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

The study will be open to all active duty personal who are:

  • diagnosed with knee pain, categorized as anterior or retropatellar in one or both knees;
  • self-reported difficulty performing at least two or more of the following activities associated with knee pain: prolonged sitting, stair climbing, running, jumping and repetitive movements such as kneeling or squatting or stooping;
  • military service member at the time of diagnosis;
  • age ≥18 and <45 years; and
  • ability to provide freely given informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Those who might be at risk of adverse outcomes from the study interventions will be excluded. This includes individuals with

  • Fracture or injury to external knee structures such that knee extension or flexion is impaired;
  • A significant co-morbid medical condition (such as severe hypertension, neurological disorder or pacemaker/defibrillator) in which NMES strength training or unsupervised exercise is contraindicated and would pose a safety threat or impair ability to participate;
  • Previous knee surgeries (i.e., tibiofemoral, patellofemoral) excluding knee arthroscopy;
  • Knee instability or recurrent patella dislocation or subluxation;
  • Inability or unwillingness to participate in a home exercise program or strengthening program;
  • Inability to speak and/or read English;
  • Reduced sensory perception in the lower extremities;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Vision impairment, where participant is classified as legally blind;
  • Unwillingness to accept random assignment; or
  • A score of 23 or greater on the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale (CES-D).

Treatment and study plan

Home Exercise Program (HEP)

Other

All participants will receive a standard home-based exercise rehabilitation protocol for PFPS. HEP teaches muscle strengthening exercises and self-management strategies to prevent recurrence. This program includes sessions with the study coordinator. A handout and given a demonstration of the daily exercises to be performed at home and weekly communication from the study coordinator regarding compliance with the exercises.

NMES

Device

To ensure consistent interventions across participants, a specified percentage of baseline maximal voluntary contraction (% MVC) will be used to determine the intensity of the training contraction. The electrical amplitude to obtain the desired intensity will be determined for each participant. Participants will train at 20-30% of MVC during weeks 1-3, 30-40% of MVC during weeks 3-6, and 40-50% of MVC during weeks 6-9. Incremental increases will be made at the 3 and 6 week clinic visits. Individualized instructions for adjusting the amplitude dial settings, with a return demonstration, will be used to maintain the appropriate percentage of MVC. During the home training sessions, participants will adjust the amplitude required to achieve the desired goal, as tolerated.

Other names: KneeHAB® XP Thigh Garment

TENS

Device

The TENS protocol consists of 20-minutes of TENS stimulation while concurrently performing the HEP. The TENS with HEP and HEP alone will be alternated for 9 weeks. The Active device delivers a pre-set program of pulsed electrostimulation using a patented asymmetrical simple modulated pulse (SMP) waveform. SMP delivers a group of pulses as a repeating 12-second cycle.

Other names: KneeHAB® XP Lead Wire TENS Applicator

Primary outcomes

  1. Lower Extremity Muscle Strength- Extension

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    The NMMT is a handheld device which measures knee extensor (KE) and flexor (KF) muscle strength. The measurement of KE strength on the PFPS leg is reported. For each test, participants performed three maximal efforts holding each contraction for 4 seconds, separated by 30-second rest; the highest value of the three trials will be accepted in kilograms.

  2. Lower Extremity Muscle Strength- Flexion

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    The NMMT is a handheld device which measures knee extensor (KE) and flexor (KF) muscle strength. The measurement of KE strength on the PFPS leg is reported. For each test, participants performed three maximal efforts holding each contraction for 4 seconds, separated by 30-second rest; the highest value of the three trials will be accepted in kilograms.

  3. Lower Extremity Strength- 30-Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Mobility was measured by the number of complete standing and sitting cycles in 30-seconds

  4. Lower Extremity Strength- Timed Stair Climb Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Strength, balance, and power were measured by the number seconds it took to ascend and descend 4 steps (6 in rise, 11.5 in run).

  5. Lower Extremity Mobility- Forward Step-down Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Mobility was measured by the number of step down repetitions completed in 30 seconds.

  6. Lower Extremity Mobility- 6-Minute Walk Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Mobility was measured by the distance walked at a fast pace over 6-minutes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Current Knee Pain

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Current Knee Pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point numerical rating scale. Participants rated current knee pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A mean pain score was calculated.

  2. Knee Pain Following Performance Testing- 30-Second Chair Stand Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Knee pain intensity after the 30-Second Chair Stand Test was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point numerical rating scale. Participants rated current knee pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A mean pain score was calculated.

  3. Knee Pain Following Performance Testing- Stair Climb Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Knee pain intensity after the Stair Climb Test was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point numerical rating scale. Participants rated current knee pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A mean pain score was calculated.

  4. Knee Pain Following Performance Testing- Forward Step Down Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Knee pain intensity after the Forward Step Down Test was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point numerical rating scale. Participants rated current knee pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A mean pain score was calculated.

  5. Knee Pain Following Performance Testing- 6-Minute Walk Test

    Time frame: 0, 3, 6, and 9 weeks

    Knee pain intensity after the 6-Minute Walk Test was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, an 11-point numerical rating scale. Participants rated current knee pain intensity on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). A mean pain score was calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Tennessee

Other

Collaborators

  • Blanchfield Army Community Hospital

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 5, 2015
Registry last updated
Oct 1, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.