Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02574455

Trial of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Participants With Refractory/Relapsed Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of sacituzumab govitecan to the treatment of physician's choice (TPC) as measured by independently-reviewed Independent Review Committee (IRC) progression-free survival (PFS) in participants with locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) previously treated with at least two systemic chemotherapy regimens for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic disease, and without brain metastasis at baseline.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed TNBC based on the most recent analyzed biopsy or other pathology specimen. Triple negative is defined as <1% expression for estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) by in-situ hybridization.
  • Refractory to or relapsed after at least two prior standard therapeutic regimens for advanced/metastatic TNBC.
  • Prior exposure to a taxane in localized or advanced/metastatic setting.
  • Eligible for one of the chemotherapy options listed as TPC (eribulin, capecitabine, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) as per investigator assessment.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0 or 1.
  • Measurable disease by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1). Bone-only disease is not permitted.
  • At least 2 weeks beyond prior anti-cancer treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, radiotherapy, and/or major surgery), and recovered from all acute toxicities to Grade 1 or less (except alopecia and peripheral neuropathy).
  • At least 2 weeks beyond high dose systemic corticosteroids (however, low dose corticosteroids < 20 mg prednisone or equivalent daily are permitted provided the dose is stable for 4 weeks).
  • Adequate hematology without ongoing transfusional support (hemoglobin > 9 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1,500 per mm^3, platelets > 100,000 per mm^3).
  • Adequate renal and hepatic function (creatinine clearance [CrCL] > 60 mL/min, bilirubin ≤ 1.5 institutional upper limit of normal [IULN], aspartate aminotransferase [AST] and alanine aminotransferase [ALT] ≤ 2.5 x IULN or ≤ 5 x IULN if known liver metastases and serum albumin ≥3 g/dL).
  • Recovered from all toxicities to Grade 1 or less by National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) v4.03 (except alopecia or peripheral neuropathy that may be Grade 2 or less) at the time of randomization. Participants with Grade 2 neuropathy are eligible but may not receive vinorelbine as TPC.
  • Participants with treated, non-progressive brain metastases, off high-dose steroids (>20 mg prednisone or equivalent) for at least 4 weeks can be enrolled in the trial.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant or lactating.
  • Women of childbearing potential or fertile men unwilling to use effective contraception during study and up to three months after treatment discontinuation in women of child-bearing potential and six months in males post last study drug.
  • Participants with Gilbert's disease.
  • Participants with non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix are eligible, while participants with other prior malignancies must have had at least a 3-year disease-free interval.
  • Participants known to be human immunodeficiency (HIV) positive, hepatitis B positive, or hepatitis C positive.
  • Infection requiring antibiotic use within one week of randomization.
  • Other concurrent medical or psychiatric conditions that, in the Investigator's opinion, may be likely to confound study interpretation or prevent completion of study procedures and follow-up examinations.

Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Treatment and study plan

Sacituzumab govitecan

Drug

10 mg/kg administered as a slow intravenous (IV) infusion either by gravity or with an infusion pump. Infusion rate for the first 15 minutes will start with 50 mg/hour or less with a subsequent infusion of 100 to 200 mg/hour up to a maximum recommended rate (advanced every 15 to 30 minutes) of 500 mg/hour with a subsequent infusion of 1000 mg/hour.

Other names: IMMU-132, Trodelvy®

Eribulin

Drug

Administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes at a dose 1.4 mg/m^2 at North American sites and 1.23 mg/m^2 at European sites on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for up to 15.3 months. Lower doses will be administered on the same schedule to participants with moderate hepatic impairment (ie, Child-Pugh B; 0.7 mg/m^2 and 0.67 mg/m^2 for North American and European sites, respectively).

Other names: Halaven

Capecitabine

Drug

1000 to 1250 mg/m^2 will be administered in a 21-day cycle, with capecitabine administered orally twice daily for 2 weeks followed by 1-week rest period for up to 10.6 months.

Other names: Xeloda

Gemcitabine

Drug

800 to 1200 mg/m^2 will be administered IV over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for up to 8.1 months.

Other names: Gemzar

Vinorelbine

Drug

25 mg/m^2 will be administered as a weekly IV injection over 6-10 minutes for up to 11.5 months. Vinorelbine will not be allowed as TPC for any participant with Grade 2 neuropathy.

Other names: Navelbine

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Independent Review Committee (IRC) Assessment in Brain Metastasis Negative (BM-ve) Population

    Time frame: From randomization until objective tumor progression or death (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The date of progression was date of the last observation or radiological assessment of target lesions that either showed a predefined increase (greater than or equal to [≥] 20%) in the sum of the target lesions or the appearance of new non-target lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimate.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by IRC Assessment in the ITT Population

    Time frame: From randomization until objective tumor progression or death (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    PFS was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression by RECIST v1.1 or death, whichever came first. The date of progression was date of the last observation or radiological assessment of target lesions that either showed a predefined increase (≥20%) in the sum of the target lesions or the appearance of new non-target lesions. PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimate.

  2. Overall Survival (OS) in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From the randomization to death from any cause (maximum follow-up duration: 30.8 months)

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimate.

  3. Overall Survival (OS) in ITT Population

    Time frame: From the randomization to death from any cause (maximum follow-up duration: 30.8 months)

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the randomization to death from any cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier estimate.

  4. Objective Response Rate (ORR) by IRC and Investigator Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of progression or death (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had the overall best response as either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) relative to the size of population under evaluation. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; and normalization of tumor marker levels initially above upper limits of normal; and no new lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; and no new lesions.

  5. Time to Objective Response by the Investigator Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization to the first recorded objective response (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to the first recorded objective response (ie, CR or PR). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; and normalization of tumor marker levels initially above upper limits of normal; and no new lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; and no new lesions.

  6. Time to Objective Response by the IRC Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization to the first recorded objective response (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to the first recorded objective response (ie, CR or PR). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; and normalization of tumor marker levels initially above upper limits of normal; and no new lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; and no new lesions.

  7. Duration of Response (DOR) by IRC and Investigator Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From the first date of documented response of CR or PR to the date of progression or death (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    DOR was defined as the number of days between the first date showing a documented response of CR or PR and the date of progression or death. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; and normalization of tumor marker levels initially above upper limits of normal; and no new lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; and no new lesions. The date of progression was date of the last observation or radiological assessment of target lesions that either showed a predefined increase (≥20%) in the sum of the target lesions or the appearance of new non-target lesions.

  8. Time to Progression (TTP) by Investigator Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    Time to Progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first evidence of disease progression as assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The date of progression was date of the last observation or radiological assessment of target lesions that either showed a predefined increase (≥20%) in the sum of the target lesions or the appearance of new non-target lesions. Participants without progression were censored.

  9. Time to Progression (TTP) by IRC Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization until disease progression (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    Time to Progression (TTP) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first evidence of disease progression as assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria. The date of progression was date of the last observation or radiological assessment of target lesions that either showed a predefined increase (≥20%) in the sum of the target lesions or the appearance of new non-target lesions. Participants without progression were censored.

  10. Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by IRC and Investigator Assessment in BM-ve Population

    Time frame: From randomization to the date of progression or death (assessed every 6 weeks for 9 months and then every 9 weeks thereafter until the occurrence of progression of disease; maximum exposure: 29.6 months)

    CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with best response as either CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) with a duration of ≥6 months. CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; and normalization of tumor marker levels initially above upper limits of normal; and no new lesions. PR: ≥30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD; and no new lesions. SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the treatment started; and Persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s) or/and maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits. PD: ≥20% increase in the sum of LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since treatment started or appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

  11. Percentage of Participants Experiencing Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), and TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug

    Time frame: First dose date up to last follow-up (maximum up to 30.8 months)

    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any adverse events (AEs) that begin or worsen on or after the start of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug. The severity was graded based on the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.03. An AE that met one or more of the following outcomes was classified as serious:

    • Fatal
    • Life-threatening
    • Disabling/incapacitating
    • Results in hospitalization or prolongs a hospital stay
    • A congenital abnormality
    • Other important medical events may also be considered serious AEs if they may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above
  12. Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Score

    Time frame: Baseline; End of Treatment (EOT) (up to 29.6 months)

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess quality of life (QoL), it is composed of 30 questions (items) resulting in 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties). All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. Higher score for the functioning scales and global health status indicate a better quality of life; a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. Lower scores on the symptom and single-item scales indicate a better quality of life; a negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

  13. Percentage of Participants Experiencing the Worst Laboratory Abnormalities Grade 3 or 4 Post-Baseline

    Time frame: First dose date up to last follow-up (maximum up to 30.8 months)

    Blood samples were collected for hematology, serum chemistry and the laboratory abnormalities were assessed. The most severe graded abnormality observed post-baseline for each graded test was counted for each participant. Safety as assessed by grading of laboratory values and AEs according to the National Cancer Institutes' Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) covering grades 0-5 (0=Normal, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe, 4=Life-threatening, 5=Death). The percentage of participants with worst postbaseline grades 3 or 4 are reported.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Gilead Sciences

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An International, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase III Trial of Sacituzumab Govitecan Versus Treatment of Physician Choice in Patients With Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received at Least Two Prior Treatments

Acronym: ASCENT

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Oct 12, 2015
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.