Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital
Seoul, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT05294900
- Objective: Primary objective: To evaluate the major pathologic response (mPR) of locally advanced head and neck cancer after paclitaxel and carboplatin-induction chemotherapy followed by surgery.
Secondary objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy. Outcome metrics: Local relapse rate (LRR), Relapse-free survival (RFS), Overall survival (OS), Adverse reactions according to CTCAE 5.0 Exploratory Purpose: To evaluate changes in circulating tumor cells (CTC) and immunodynamics before and after paclitaxel and carboplatin-induction chemotherapy through blood, biopsy specimens, and surgical specimen analysis.
* background :
* Chemoradiation (CRT) or chemotherapy (Induction Chemotherapy (IC) + CRT) after induction chemotherapy has been performed for locally advanced head and neck cancer that cannot be operated immediately or for organ function preservation. . * The efficacy of induction chemotherapy before chemotherapy has been controversial because the results of several phase 3 clinical studies are inconsistent. At present, it is difficult to assert the superiority of either the addition of induction chemotherapy or radiation therapy alone, but in certain subgroups (advanced N stage such as N2c/N3) induction chemotherapy is a useful option to lower distant metastases. I can do it. * As a result of the TAX324 clinical trial, when weekly carboplatin-based chemotherapy or surgery was performed after adjuvant Docetaxel + Cisplatin + 5FU chemotherapy, overall survival was improved compared to Cisplatin + 5FU (HR 0.7, p=0.0058), It resulted in improvement of institutional retention rate (3 year LFS: 52% vs 32%). However, it is difficult to apply this TPF therapy to all patients in actual clinical practice due to the toxicity (neutropenia, nephrotoxicity) and the limitation of anticancer radiation. * In a retrospective study, in the case of adjuvant paclitaxel + carboplatin, there was no difference in progression-free survival compared to TPF (p=0.15), and there was no statistically significant decrease in the local recurrence rate (HR 0.27, p = 0.04). Confirmed. * Therefore, in this study, when paclitaxel and carboplatin-induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and chemotherapy after surgery, compared to standard TPF-induced chemotherapy, it is expected that the clinical outcome will be improved with less toxicity. * Hypothesis: Paclitaxel and carboplatin-induction chemotherapy followed by surgery, followed by chemo-radiation after surgery according to standard guidelines Compared with the existing standard treatment (TCF), improvement of clinical outcome with less toxicity * Study procedure
* Induction chemotherapy Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 (calculated by Cockcroft - Gault formula) Combination therapy A total of 2 intravenous infusions every 3 weeks Surgery performed within 2-9 weeks after induction chemotherapy * surgery The surgery in this study means a complete resection for the purpose of a complete cure, and aims for a minimally invasive surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Seoul, South Korea
o Induction chemotherapy Paclitaxel 175mg/m2 + Carboplatin AUC5 (calculated by Cockcroft - Gault formula) Combination therapy A total of 2 intravenous infusions every 3 weeks"
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion
Exclusion
Induction chemotherapy : total 2 cycle every 3weeks as below:
Time frame: At the time of surgery following two cycles of neoadjuvant paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy (approximately 6-9 weeks after treatment initiation).
Major Pathologic Response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% residual viable tumor cells in the resected primary tumor specimen following completion of two cycles of neoadjuvant paclitaxel-carboplatin chemotherapy. Pathologic evaluation was performed by two independent board-certified pathologists in a blinded manner. MPR reflects the extent of tumor regression induced by neoadjuvant therapy and serves as a key indicator of treatment efficacy in resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Yonsei University
Other
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Therapy With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in Operable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer Patients (NEOS)
Acronym: NEOS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06307093
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Istra, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07435324
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Arkhangelsk, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07435311
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Barnaul, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07682285
Cancer-related Fatigue, Carcinoma
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial Details