Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00168181

Trial Comparing Oral Pilocarpine (Salagen) Versus Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer Protocol, For the Prevention of Radiation (XRT) Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

This is a study to see whether the drug Salagen or salivary gland transfer is better for the prevention of dryness of the mouth in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiation treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Cross Cancer Institute

Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Previously untreated and confirmed histological diagnosis of squamous cell/adenoid cystic carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and patients with unknown primary tumor with metastases to the neck nodes and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin of head and neck region with ipsilateral neck nodes (more than one node) metastases.
  • Radiation volume to encompass > or equal to 80% of major salivary glands (parotids and the non-transferred submandibular salivary gland) and have > or equal to 50 Gys delivered to that volume via external beam.
  • Karnofsky performance score > or equal to 70
  • Minimum age 18 years
  • The patient must sign a study-specific informed consent prior to study entry
  • Expected survival > or equal to one year

Exclusion criteria

  • Carcinoma of nasopharynx, oral cavity, N3 disease, bilateral neck node involvement, pre-epiglottic space involvement, involvement of level 1 nodes on either side of the neck, and patients with post-operative recurrent disease.
  • Salivary gland malignancy
  • Salivary gland disease
  • Use of anti-cholinergic drugs and tricyclic drugs
  • Delay in XRT of more than 8 weeks following the curative surgery
  • Pregnant or lactating females are not eligible. Patients of childbearing potential should agree to use an effective method of contraception
  • Prior head and neck irradiation
  • Recurrent disease
  • Allergy to pilocarpine
  • Patients with uncontrolled asthma, acute iritis, or narrow angle glaucoma

Treatment and study plan

Submandibular gland Transfer

Procedure

Salagen

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare the efficacy of prevention of XRT induced xerostomia using two different approaches: oral Pilocarpine versus submandibular salivary gland transfer protocol; To compare the rate and severity of XRT induced xerostomia using these two strategies

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the incidence of oral candidiasis, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and hospitalization during XRT

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alberta Health services

Other

Collaborators

  • CancerCare Manitoba
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • Newfoundland Cancer Treatment & Research Foundation
  • Notre-dame Hospital
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Pilocarpine (Salagen) Versus Submandibular Salivary Gland Transfer Protocol, For the Prevention of Radiation (XRT) Induced Xerostomia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients

Important dates

Study start
2002
Study completion
2008
First posted
Sep 15, 2005
Registry last updated
Apr 18, 2011

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.