NCT Number: NCT02272361
Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair.
The primary objective of this study is to compare with PFDI-20 questionnaire the functional outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and vaginal mesh surgery in the treatment of symptomatic exteriorised cystocele up to 4 years after surgery.
The secondary objectives of this study are the following:
1. to compare the two techniques for anatomical results based on the clinical evaluation of patients with POP-Q. 2. to overall quality of life assessment and expectations of patients. 3. to compare the two techniques for the long-term safety. The evaluation will focus on the adverse effects of long-term sexual and genital symptoms, urinary and digestive functional symptoms, and chronic pelvic pain. 4. to compare the improvement of the functional outcome assessed by PFDI-20 questionnaire (matched-analysis before versus after).
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
45 year–75 year
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Sébatien BLANC, Annecy, France
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- All the patients included in the PROSPERE study will be included in the PROSPERE-4 study. The inclusion criterias for the PROSPERE study are:
- Written informed consent
- insured under the French social security system
Exclusion criteria
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the requirements of this protocol, including the presence of any condition (physical, mental, or social) that is likely to affect the subject's ability to comply with the study protocol
- Participation in another trial
Treatment and study plan
vaginal mesh surgery
OtherPrimary outcomes
-
PFDI-20 score
Time frame: 4 years
The patient-reported outcome of the intervention will be evaluated using the symptom score calculated using the PFDI-20. It is a self-administered questionnaire on symptoms of prolapse
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Lille
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Sacropexy and Vaginal Mesh Surgery for Women Cystocele Repair: Functional and Anatomical Results at Four Years Follow-up
Acronym: PROSPERE4
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2018
- Study completion
- 2018
- First posted
- Oct 22, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Apr 22, 2026
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Prosthetic Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT01637441
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Annecy, France
View Trial DetailsRUG-WEAVING PLICATION IN CYSTOCELE TREATMENT
NCT07336108
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsUGYTEX® Mesh Versus Subvesical Plication in the Surgical Treatment of Bladder Prolapse
NCT02255994
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Béziers, France
View Trial DetailsAbsorbable Suture vs Permanent Suture in Sacrospinous Ligament Suspension
NCT05688059
Cystocele, Female Urogenital Diseases
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
View Trial Details