Peripheral stenting
Devicestent implantation during the index procedure
NCT Number: NCT02921230
The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions in the femoropopliteal arteries.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
LKH Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions 30-210 mm long located in the femoropopliteal arteries in subjects with symptoms classified as Rutherford categories 2-4.
The study is a 2:1 randomized (ELUVIA vs Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents), controlled, single-blind, superiority trial (RCT).
The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions up to 210 mm in length when compared against bare metal stents, and collect additional data including health economics data.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
stent implantation during the index procedure
Time frame: 12 Months
The primary effectiveness endpoint assesses primary patency at 12 months post-procedure. This effectiveness endpoint is designed to demonstrate that the 12-month primary patency for the ELUVIA treatment group is superior to the Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents treatment group.
Time frame: 12 Months
Walking Improvement will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating the change in Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) / treadmill test from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization and evaluating change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) from baseline.
Values are represented as a mean and standard deviation and reflect the change in meters walked.
Time frame: 12 Months
The change in quality of life will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating change in EuroQol (EQ) - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 5 Levels (5L) questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L™) from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization Values are presented as a count of subjects at 12-months and by the number of subjects analyzed.
Time frame: during index procedure, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Cost effectiveness of ELUVIA™ drug-eluting stent versus bare metal self-expanding nitinol stents.
Time frame: 12 months
Clinical improvement will be evaluated by assessing the changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline.
Values are presented as a count of participants at 12-months by the number of participants analyzed.
Rutherford Classification describes 7 categories of peripheral artery disease, including both the patient's clinical symptoms as well as objective findings;
Primary sustained clinical improvement, is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline without the need for repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR);
Secondary sustained clinical improvement is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline including those subjects with repeat TLR;
Clinical deterioration, is the rate of downgrade in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Hemodynamic improvement was evaluated by assessing the number of participants that demonstrated an increase in the Ankle-Brachial Index value of >/= 0.10 or an increase in the overall ABI value to >/= 0.90 from baseline to 12 months
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Walking Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months assessed by change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) from baseline.
Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months
Quality of Life Improvement will be assessed at 1-month, 6-months, 24-months, and 36-months by evaluating the change in EQ-5D-5L™ from baseline
Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months
Clinical improvement will be evaluated by assessing the changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline
Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months
The hemodynamic improvement will be evaluated by assessing changes in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) from baseline
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Primary Patency and Assisted Primary Patency at 6 months, 12 months using different Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) and Peak Systolic Velocity Ration (PSVRs). All DUS readings will be assessed by an independent core laboratory. Primary Patency is reported at 6 and 12-months.
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Adverse Event rate and Major Adverse Event rate, defined as all causes of death, target limb major amputation and/or Target Lesion Revascularization, rate at each time point
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months
Target Lesion Revascularization, defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion(s) after the index procedure, rate at each time point.
Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months
Target Vessel Revascularization, defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target vessel after the index procedure, rate at each time point.
Time frame: during index procedure after stent delivered and deployed to the target lesion
Technical success defined as delivery and deployment of the assigned study stent to the target lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% assessed visually
Time frame: within 24 hours of stenting procedure
Procedural success defined as technical success with no MAEs noted within 24 hours of the index procedure
Time frame: 12 Months
Number of Stent Fractures reported at 12 months utilizing the Vascular InterVentional Advances (VIVA) definitions assessed by an independent core laboratory.
Stent fractures were analyzed if sites collected imaging per standard of care (SOC).
Boston Scientific Corporation
Industry
A Randomized Trial Comparing the ELUVIA Drug-eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Self-expanding Nitinol Stents in the Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Arteries
Acronym: EMINENT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03037411
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT03898570
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03856606
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04624854
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
View Trial Details