Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02921230

Trial Comparing ELUVIA Versus Bare Metal Stent in Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery

The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions in the femoropopliteal arteries.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

LKH Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The EMINENT study is a prospective, multi-center study evaluating the effectiveness of the ELUVIA stent versus Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents in the treatment of lesions 30-210 mm long located in the femoropopliteal arteries in subjects with symptoms classified as Rutherford categories 2-4.

The study is a 2:1 randomized (ELUVIA vs Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents), controlled, single-blind, superiority trial (RCT).

The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the ELUVIA Drug-Eluting Vascular Stent System (ELUVIA Stent) for treating Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA) lesions up to 210 mm in length when compared against bare metal stents, and collect additional data including health economics data.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects age 18 and older
  • Subject is willing and able to provide consent before any study-specific test or procedure is performed, signs the consent form, and agrees to attend all required follow-up visits
  • Chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia defined as Rutherford categories 2, 3 or 4
  • Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive lesion(s) located in the native Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) and/or Proximal Popliteal Artery (PPA):
  • Degree of stenosis ≥ 70 % by visual angiographic assessment
  • Vessel diameter ≥ 4 and ≤ 6 mm
  • Total lesion length (or series of lesions) ≥ 30 mm and ≤210 mm (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one or two overlapping ELUVIA stent(s) or Self Expanding Bare Nitinol stent(s))
  • For occluded lesions (chronic occlusions) requiring use of re-entry device, lesion length ≤ 180 mm
  • Target lesion located at least three centimeters above the inferior edge of the femur
  • Patent infrapopliteal and popliteal artery, i.e., single vessel runoff or better with at least one of three vessels patent (< 50 % stenosis) to the ankle or foot with no planned intervention

Exclusion criteria

  • Previously stented target lesion/vessel
  • Target lesion/vessel previously treated with drug-coated balloon within 12 months prior to randomization/enrollment
  • Subjects who have undergone prior surgery of the SFA/PPA in the target limb to treat atherosclerotic disease
  • Use of atherectomy, laser or other debulking devices such as Rotarex in the target limb SFA/PPA during the index procedure
  • History of major amputation in the target limb
  • Documented life expectancy less than 24 months due to other medical co-morbid condition(s) that could limit the subject's ability to participate in the clinical study, limit the subject's compliance with the follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the clinical study
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to contrast dye that, in the opinion of the investigator, cannot be adequately pre-medicated
  • Known hypersensitivity/allergy to the stent system or protocol related therapies (e.g., nitinol, paclitaxel, or structurally related compounds, polymer or individual components, and antiplatelet, anticoagulant, thrombolytic medications)
  • Platelet count less than 80000 mm3 or more than 600000 mm3 or history of bleeding diathesis
  • Concomitant renal failure with a serum creatinine higher than 2.0 mg/dL
  • Receiving dialysis or immunosuppressant therapy
  • History of myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within 6 months prior to randomization/enrollment
  • Unstable angina pectoris at the time of randomization/enrollment
  • Pregnant, breast feeding, or plan to become pregnant in the next 5 years
  • Current participation in an investigational drug or device clinical study that has not completed the primary endpoint at the time of randomization/ enrollment or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints (Note: studies requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have become commercially available since then are not considered investigational studies)
  • Septicemia at the time of randomization/enrollment
  • Presence of other hemodynamically significant outflow lesions in the target limb requiring intervention at the time of the index procedure
  • Presence of aneurysm in the target vessel
  • Acute ischemia and/or acute thrombosis of the SFA/PPA prior to randomization/enrollment
  • Perforated vessel as evidenced by extravasation of contrast media prior to randomization/enrollment
  • Heavily calcified lesions
  • As applicable by French law, subject who is a protected individual such as an incompetent adult or incarcerated person

Treatment and study plan

Peripheral stenting

Device

stent implantation during the index procedure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Primary Patency at 12 Months Post-procedure

    Time frame: 12 Months

    The primary effectiveness endpoint assesses primary patency at 12 months post-procedure. This effectiveness endpoint is designed to demonstrate that the 12-month primary patency for the ELUVIA treatment group is superior to the Self-Expanding Bare Nitinol Stents treatment group.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects Walking Improvement - Distance at Baseline to 12 Months

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Walking Improvement will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating the change in Six Minute Hall Walk (6MHW) / treadmill test from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization and evaluating change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) from baseline.

    Values are represented as a mean and standard deviation and reflect the change in meters walked.

  2. Number of Subjects Change in Quality of Life - Improvement From Baseline to 12 Month

    Time frame: 12 Months

    The change in quality of life will be assessed and compared between the 2 study arms, by evaluating change in EuroQol (EQ) - 5 Dimensions (5D) - 5 Levels (5L) questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L™) from baseline, or preceding any Target Vessel Revascularization Values are presented as a count of subjects at 12-months and by the number of subjects analyzed.

  3. Cost Effectiveness

    Time frame: during index procedure, 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

    Cost effectiveness of ELUVIA™ drug-eluting stent versus bare metal self-expanding nitinol stents.

  4. Number of Subjects With Clinical Improvement at 12-months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Clinical improvement will be evaluated by assessing the changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline.

    Values are presented as a count of participants at 12-months by the number of participants analyzed.

    Rutherford Classification describes 7 categories of peripheral artery disease, including both the patient's clinical symptoms as well as objective findings;

    Primary sustained clinical improvement, is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline without the need for repeat target lesion revascularization (TLR);

    Secondary sustained clinical improvement is a rate of improvement in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline including those subjects with repeat TLR;

    Clinical deterioration, is the rate of downgrade in Rutherford classification of one or more categories as compared to baseline

  5. Number of Subjects With Hemodynamic Improvement at 12-months

    Time frame: 12 months

    Hemodynamic improvement was evaluated by assessing the number of participants that demonstrated an increase in the Ankle-Brachial Index value of >/= 0.10 or an increase in the overall ABI value to >/= 0.90 from baseline to 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Walking Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months

    Walking Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 12-months, 24-months, and 36-months assessed by change in Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) from baseline.

  2. Number of Subjects With Quality of Life Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 24-months, and 36-months

    Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months

    Quality of Life Improvement will be assessed at 1-month, 6-months, 24-months, and 36-months by evaluating the change in EQ-5D-5L™ from baseline

  3. Number of Subjects With Clinical Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 24-months, and 36-months

    Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months

    Clinical improvement will be evaluated by assessing the changes in Rutherford Classification from baseline

  4. Number of Subjects With Hemodynamic Improvement at 1-month, 6-months, 24-months, and 36-months

    Time frame: 1, 6, 24, and 36 months

    The hemodynamic improvement will be evaluated by assessing changes in Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) from baseline

  5. Primary Patency and Assisted Primary Patency

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    Primary Patency and Assisted Primary Patency at 6 months, 12 months using different Duplex Ultrasound (DUS) and Peak Systolic Velocity Ration (PSVRs). All DUS readings will be assessed by an independent core laboratory. Primary Patency is reported at 6 and 12-months.

  6. Adverse Event and Major Adverse Event (MAE) Rate

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months

    Adverse Event rate and Major Adverse Event rate, defined as all causes of death, target limb major amputation and/or Target Lesion Revascularization, rate at each time point

  7. Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) Rate

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months

    Target Lesion Revascularization, defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion(s) after the index procedure, rate at each time point.

  8. Clinically-driven Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) Rate

    Time frame: 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months

    Target Vessel Revascularization, defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target vessel after the index procedure, rate at each time point.

  9. Technical Success

    Time frame: during index procedure after stent delivered and deployed to the target lesion

    Technical success defined as delivery and deployment of the assigned study stent to the target lesion to achieve residual angiographic stenosis no greater than 30% assessed visually

  10. Procedural Success

    Time frame: within 24 hours of stenting procedure

    Procedural success defined as technical success with no MAEs noted within 24 hours of the index procedure

  11. Number of Stent Fractures

    Time frame: 12 Months

    Number of Stent Fractures reported at 12 months utilizing the Vascular InterVentional Advances (VIVA) definitions assessed by an independent core laboratory.

    Stent fractures were analyzed if sites collected imaging per standard of care (SOC).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Boston Scientific Corporation

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Trial Comparing the ELUVIA Drug-eluting Stent Versus Bare Metal Self-expanding Nitinol Stents in the Treatment of Superficial Femoral and/or Proximal Popliteal Arteries

Acronym: EMINENT

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 3, 2016
Registry last updated
Feb 24, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.