Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04288102

Treatment With Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Severe Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

COVID-19 caused clusters of severe respiratory illness and was associated with 2% mortality. No specific anti-viral treatment exists. The mainstay of clinical management is largely symptomatic treatment, with organ support in intensive care for seriously ill patients. Cellular therapy, using mesenchymal stem cells has been shown to reduce nonproductive inflammation and affect tissue regeneration and is being evaluated in patients with ARDS. This clinical trial is to inspect the safety and efficiency of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy for severe COVID-19.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

General Hospital of Central Theater Command, Wuhan, Hubei, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection has unprecedentedly spread in the worldwide and been declared as a pandemic by the world health organization. COVID-19 is characterized by sustained cytokines production and hyper-inflammation, can cause clusters of severe respiratory illness with a fatality rate around 2-5%. There are currently no prophylactic vaccine and no specific antiviral treatment agents available recommended for COVID-19. Therefore, it is urgent to find a safe and effective therapeutic approach to COVID-19.

During the last decade, the promising features of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), including their regenerative properties and ability to differentiate into diverse cell lineages, have generated great interest among researchers whose work has offered intriguing perspectives on cell-based therapies for various diseases. These findings seem to highlight that the beneficial effect of MSC-based treatment could be principally due by the immunomodulation and regenerative potential of these cells. MSCs could significantly reduce the pathological changes of lung and inhibit the cell-mediated immune inflammatory response induced by influenza virus in animal model . MSCs has been shown to reduce nonproductive inflammation and affect tissue regeneration and is being evaluated in patients with ARDS. Our phase I preliminary data of parallel assignment study(NCT04252118) showed that three doses of MSCs was safe in patients with COVID-19. Randomized control trial is needed to assess efficacy and safety.

The investigators will do a prospective, double-blind, multicentre, randomised trial to assess treatment with three intravenous doses of MSCs compared with placebo. 90 severe COVID-19 patients will be recruited in China. 60 patients will receive i.v. transfusion 3 times of MSCs (4.0*10E7 cells per time) and the standard of care as the treated group. In addition, the 30 patients will receive placebo and standard of care as control group.

Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, day28 and 90, change in consolidation/ ground-glass lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90, time to clinical improvement in 28 days, mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scale, 6-minute walk test, maximum vital capacity (VCmax), Diffusing Capacity (DLCO), oxygen saturation, oxygenation index, duration of oxygen therapy, side effects, immunological characteristics (immune cells, inflammatory factors, etc.) will be evaluated during the 90 days follow up.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, aged at 18 years (including) -75 years old
  • Hospitalized
  • Laboratory confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) from any diagnostic sampling source
  • Pneumonia that is judged by computed tomography
  • In accordance with any one of the following : 1)dyspnea (RR ≥ 30 times / min), 2)finger oxygen saturation ≤ 93% in resting state, 3)arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) / oxygen absorption concentration (FiO2) ≤ 300MMHG, 4)pulmonary imaging shows that the focus progress > 50% in 24-48 hours
  • Interstitial lung damage is judged by computed tomography.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy, lactation and those who are not pregnant but do not take effective contraceptives measures;
  • Patients with malignant tumor, other serious systemic diseases and psychosis;
  • Patients who are participating in other clinical trials;
  • Inability to provide informed consent or to comply with test requirements.
  • Co-Infection of HIV, tuberculosis, influenza virus, adenovirus and other respiratory infection virus.
  • Invasive ventilation
  • Shock
  • Combined with other organ failure( need organ support)
  • Interstitial lung damage caused by other reasons ( in 2 weeks)
  • The pulmonary imaging revealed the interstitial damage of lungs before the COVID-19 confirmed.

Treatment and study plan

UC-MSCs

Biological

3 does of UC-MSCs(4.0*10E7 cells per time) intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6.

Saline containing 1% Human serum albumin(solution without UC-MSCs)

Biological

3 does of placebo(intravenously at Day 0, Day 3, Day 6)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 28.

    Time frame: Day 28

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10 and 90

    Time frame: Day 10, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  2. Change in consolidation lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90.

    Time frame: Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  3. Change in ground-glass lesion proportion (%) of full lung volume from baseline to day 10, 28 and 90.

    Time frame: Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  4. Pulmonary fibrosis - related morphological features in CT scan at day 90 a. cord-like shadow b. honeycomb-like shadows c. interlobular septal thickening d. intralobular interstitial thickening e. pleural thickening

    Time frame: Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  5. Lung densitometry: Change in total voxel 'weight' in lesion area voxel 'weight'=voxel density (in HU) × voxel volume (in voxel)

    Time frame: Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  6. Lung densitometry: volumes histogram of lung density distribution (<-750, -750~-300, -300~50, >50) at day 10, 28 and 90.

    Time frame: Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  7. Time to clinical improvement in 28 days.

    Time frame: Day 28

    Clinical improvement defined as a one-point deduction from baseline in a 6 ordinal scale:

    • Not hospitalized;
    • Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen;
    • Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen;
    • Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices;
    • Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO;
    • Death.
  8. Oxygenation index( PaO2/FiO2)

    Time frame: Day 6, Day 10, Day 28

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  9. Duration of oxygen therapy(days)

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  10. Blood oxygen saturation

    Time frame: Day 6, Day 10, Day 28

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  11. 6-minute walk test

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  12. Maximum vital capacity (VCmax)

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 10, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  13. Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 10, Day 14, Day 21, Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

  14. mMRC (Modified Medical Research Council) dyspnea scale

    Time frame: Day 28, Day 90

    Evaluation of Pneumonia Improvement

    No limitation of activities, discharged from hospital =Score 1; Hospitalized, no oxygen therapy=Score 2; Oxygen by mask or nasal prongs-Score 3; Non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen=Score 4; Mechanical ventilation or ECMO=Score 5; Death=Score 6.

  15. Changes of absolute lymphocyte counts and subsets from baseline to day 6, 10, 28 and 90.

    Time frame: Day 6, Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Marker of Immunological function

  16. Changes of cytokine/chemokine levels from baseline to day 6, 10, 28 and 90.

    Time frame: Day 6, Day 10, Day 28, Day 90

    Marker of Immunological function

  17. Adverse events

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 90

    Safety endpoints

  18. Serious adverse events

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 90

    Safety endpoints

  19. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: Day 0 through Day 90

    Safety endpoints

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beijing 302 Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Huoshenshan Hospital
  • Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province
  • The General Hospital of Central Theater Command
  • Vcanbio Cell and Gene Engineering Corp., Ltd.

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase II, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Human Umbilical Cord-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Severe COVID-19 Patients

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Feb 28, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.