Assiut university faculty of medicine
Asyut, 7111, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03396406
Forty patients with history of recurrent TN were recruited in Assiut University Hospitals, Pain Unit from 2012 to 2017. Before the study, all patients were given adequate and informative data about the nature of the study, interventional procedure and its possible complications, and a well-informed written consent was obtained from each patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Asyut, 7111, Egypt
All interventions were done in a specialized well-equipped unit at Assiut University hospital and continuous hemodynamic monitoring with pulse oximetry, blood pressure and ECG applied for each patient. Light sedation by using midazolam 5mg bolus. In a supine position with slightly extended head and under fluoroscopic control, C arm rotated caudo-cranially and ipsilateraly to produce an oblique submental view and visualize foramen ovale beside the ramus of the mandible. The point of entry varied according to the affected branch, but it ranged from 0.5-1.5 cm from the corner of the mouth. The point of entry cleaned by aseptic solution and anaesthetized with 1% of Lidocaine. C arm has been rotated laterally to confirm the depth of penetration once the needle entered into Meckel's cavity. RF electrode (22-G, 10 cm needle, with a curved 5 mm active tip, Neurotherm 1100) was used and the exact position of the needle confirmed by sensory stimulation, motor stimulation and negative aspiration as the following criteria:-
After confirming the position of the RF electrode, each patient received 0.5 ml of 1% of Lidocaine to avoid discomfort during treatment. Then the type of intervention determined by the person who was responsible for randomisation process and who did not involve in assessing eligibility or interventional technique and divided into:-
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
received PRF at 42°C for 8 minutes followed by CRF at 60°C for 270s
received sole CRF at 70°C for 270 s
Time frame: one month
The response for interventional treatment was evaluated in subsequent visits at pain clinic or by telephone
Time frame: 6 months
The response for interventional treatment was evaluated in subsequent visits at pain clinic or by telephone
Time frame: one year
The response for interventional treatment was evaluated in subsequent visits at pain clinic or by telephone
Time frame: 2 years
The response for interventional treatment was evaluated in subsequent visits at pain clinic or by telephone
Time frame: 2 years
need for tricyclic antidepressant
Assiut University
Other
Comparison of Extended Duration Pulsed Radiofrequency Plus Low Temperature Thermal Radiofrequency With Thermal Radiofrequency Alone in Treatment of Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06571448
Cranial Nerve Diseases, Facial Nerve Diseases
Beijing, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07046247
Cranial Nerve Diseases, Facial Nerve Diseases
Valencia, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT04158752
Cranial Nerve Diseases, Facial Nerve Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07304453
Cranial Nerve Diseases, Facial Nerve Diseases
Karbala, Kerbala, Iraq
View Trial Details