Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03027557

Treatment of Primary Hyperparathyroidism With Denosumab and Cinacalcet.

The only known cure for primary hyperparathyroidism is surgical removal of one or more parathyroid glands. Some patients however, do not fulfill criteria for surgery or do not want to undergo a procedure due to fear of the associated risks. Therefore a medical alternative is warranted.

This study aims to evaluate the effects of Denosumab alone, and in combination with Cinacalcet, as a medical treatment for patients suffering from primary hyperparathyroidism, with mild osteoporosis. To the best of our knowledge no previously reported randomized controlled trial has investigated the use of denosumab in primary hyperparathyroidism.

60 patients will be enrolled in three different treatment-groups: 20 receiving both Denosumab and Cinacalcet, 20 Denosumab and placebo and 20 placebo and placebo. Patients included do not meet the criteria for, or have no wish for a surgical procedure.

By combining the two drugs, this study could possibly contribute to the discovery of a realistic medical alternative to surgery. It is expected that the therapy will be able to both control s-calcium and s-intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), and simultaneously enhance bone-structure. The therapy thus has the potential of preventing fractures and possibly other long-term effects of primary hyperparathyroidism such as formation of kidney stones, and coronary calcification. Another objective of this project is to investigate whether the combined therapy can facilitate an actual reset of the Calcium-sensing receptor, and thereby de facto cure the disease.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Aalborg University Hospital

Aalborg, 9000, Denmark

About this study

Background/Context:

This project deals with medical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. The only cure currently available is surgical removal of one or more parathyroid glands, but this option is neither feasible, nor desirable in all patients with the diagnosis.

Today a major group of patients are being diagnosed by coincidence with biochemical blood-screening, and are therefore in an asymptomatic state of the disease at the time of diagnosis. Long term studies show that these patients over time often have progression in their disease, and develop complications such as osteoporosis. Thus a medical alternative is warranted.

Previous studies have investigated the effects of well known antiresorptive drugs such as bisphosphonates, as well as estrogen-related compounds. These drugs have had effects on particularly bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical bone-turnover markers, but have been able only transiently to lower blood-calcium levels. Combined with too many unwanted side-effects and a high prevalence of contraindications for a large proportion of the patients needing treatment, these drugs have not provided a realistic alternative to surgery.

Treatment today generally follows the international consensus for treatment of asymptomatic patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Briefly this includes watchful waiting with biannual control-sessions for indication of surgery, screening for kidney stones/nephrolithiasis, osteoporosis and s-calcium - and s-iPTH levels.

This randomized controlled trial involves the drugs Cinacalcet og Denosumab. Denosumab has previously been shown to greatly improve BMD, lower s-calcium, lower the rate of bone-turnover and prevent osteoporotic fractures in several populations with different diseases, but has never been tested in a published randomized controlled trial in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Cinacalcet has been proved able to lower s-iPTH, lower s-Calcium and thereby relieve symptoms of hypercalcaemia caused by primary hyperparathyroidism. It does not however, lower the rate of bone turnover, and it has not been show to improve BMD.

By combining the two drugs, this study could possibly contribute to the discovery of a realistic medical alternative to surgery. It is expected that the therapy will be able to both control s-calcium and s-iPTH, and simultaneously enhance bone-structure. The therapy thus has the potential of preventing fractures and possibly other long-term effects of primary hyperparathyroidism such as formation of kidney stones, and coronary calcification. Another objective of this project is to investigate whether the combined therapy can facilitate an actual reset of the Calcium-sensing receptor, and thereby de facto cure the disease.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women of 18 years of age or older.
  • T-score by Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) between -1,0 og -3,5
  • Patients from The North Jutland Region diagnosed with primary hyperparathyroidism at the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital. (Hypercalcaemia measured at two different time-points and simultaneous elevated/inappropriately high PTH, and exclusion of differential diagnosis.)

Exclusion criteria

  • Medical history of diseases leading to hypercalcaemia other than Primary Hyperparathyroidism.
  • Patients being treated with Denosumab or Cinacalcet prior to inclusion or previously treated with Denosumab or Cinacalcet.
  • Moderately - Severely decreased liver function (alanine aminotransferase >250u/l, gamma-glutamyl transferase>150u/l, Bilirubin >30)
  • Acute myocardial infarction or apoplexia in the 3 months before inclusion.
  • Medical record of heart failure
  • Risk factors of prolonged corrected QT interval (QTc).
  • Open lesions from oral surgery.
  • Primary diseases of the bone other than osteoporosis.
  • Patients suffering from kidney disease or renal failure.
  • Patients under treatment with thiazide or lithium.
  • Medical record of generalized seizures or epilepsy.
  • Active malignant disease.
  • Known allergies towards the specified medicinal products (IMPs).
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Fertile women who do not agree to the usage of effective contraception.
  • Other circumstances, evaluated by the responsible investigator, making the subject unsuitable for participation.

Treatment and study plan

Cinacalcet 30 mg Tablet

Drug

Participants in one arm will receive 30 mg cinacalcet each day.

Other names: Mimpara, Sensipar

Denosumab Inj 60 mg/ml

Drug

Participants in two arms will receive 60 mg Denosumab biannually.

Other names: Prolia, Xgeva

Placebo tablets

Other

Participants in two arms will receive one placebo-tablet each day.

Saline Injection (Placebo)

Other

Participants in one arm will receive saline injections as placebo for denosumab.

Other names: Sodium Chloride (NaCl) Fresenius "Kabi"

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  2. Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  3. Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  4. Change in 1/3 Forearm Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline. Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  5. Percentage Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

    Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  6. Percentage Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

    Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  7. Percentage Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

    Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

  8. Percentage Change in 1/3 Forearm Bone Mineral Density

    Time frame: Baseline,one year

    Percentage change of Bone Mineral Density after one year of treatment from baseline.

    Measured with Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-scan.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Volumetric BMD for the Lumbar Spine.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.

  2. Mean P-calcium During Treatment.

    Time frame: Monthly up to one year.

    Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.

  3. Percent Change From Baseline in P-carboxy-terminal Collagen Crosslinks (CTX)

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    p-CTX, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  4. Median Agatstons Score Final

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Simultaneously with QCT-measurements coronary calcification was be assessed. Agatston score is a score based on the extent of coronary artery calcification calculated on the amount of plaque observed in a CT scan. A score of zero indicates absence of coronary calcium, 1-10: minimal calcification, 11-100 mild calcification, 101-400 moderate calcification, >400 severe calcification.

    Thus the score increases with increasing level of calcification in the coronary vessels.

  5. Patients With Nephrolithiasis Final Scan.

    Time frame: Patients with nephrolithiasis at one year reported.

    Number of subjects w. renal stones at final scan.

  6. Patients With Pancreas-calcifications Final Scan.

    Time frame: Patients with pancreas-calcifications at one year reported.

    By QCT.

  7. Reset of the Calcium Sensing Receptor?

    Time frame: 2 weeks after termination of medication.

    Measured from effect on s-calcium and PTH weeks after termination of IMP

  8. Vertebral Fracture Assessment - Final Scan

    Time frame: Patients with vertebral fractures at one year reported.

    Number of participants with vertebral fractures as assessed by VFA at final scan.

  9. Change MDI-score

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 mths, one year.

    Major Depression Inventory (MDI)-score, Baseline, 6 months, one year (week 52)., change between baseline and 1 year reported.

    The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) is a mood questionnaire developed by the World Health Organization. To calculate the total score, a sum of ten individual items (each with an individual score between 0-5, with 0 indicating absence of a symptom and 5 indicating constant presence of a given symptom) is used. A higher score signifies deeper depression with 50 being the maximum score.

  10. Adverse Reactions.

    Time frame: Monthly up to one year.

    All participants filled in questionnaires regarding symptoms related to the treatment.

    Results are reported in the Adverse Events section.

  11. Bone Mineral Content

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Measured at baseline and after one year at the lumbar spine and distal 1/3 of the non-dominant antebrachii.

  12. Change in Cortical Width.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year.

    Measured at baseline and after one year at the distal non-dominant antebrachii.

  13. Change in Volumetric BMD for the Distal Forearm.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.

  14. Percentage Change in Volumetric BMD for the Lumbar Spine.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.

  15. Percentage Change in Volumetric BMD for the Distal Forearm.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Measured at baseline and after one year by QCT.

  16. Mean p-PTH During Treatment.

    Time frame: Monthly up to one year.

    Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.

  17. Mean p-Phosphate During Treatment.

    Time frame: Monthly up to one year.

    Blood samples were acquired once every 4 weeks for safety-purposes.

  18. Percent Change From Baseline in p-N-terminal Propeptide of Type I Procollagen (p-P1NP).

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    p-P1NP, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  19. Percent Change From Baseline in P-osteocalcin.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    p-osteocalcin, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  20. Percent Change From Baseline in S-bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BAP).

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    S-Bone specific alkaline phosphatase, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  21. Percent Change From Baseline in p-Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase 5b (Trap5b).

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    P-Trap5b, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  22. Percent Change From Baseline in p-Sclerostin.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    P-Sclerostin, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  23. Percent Change From Baseline in P-fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23).

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    P-FGF23 , change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  24. Changes in p-25-vitamin D

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    P-25-vitD , change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  25. Changes in s-1,25-vitamin D

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 48 weeks reported.

    S-1,25-vitD, change from baseline at 48 weeks.

  26. Patients With Nephrocalcinosis, Final Scan.

    Time frame: Baseline, one year

    Number of subjects w. renal calcifications at final scan.

Other outcomes

  1. Safety Measures

    Time frame: Monthly up to one year.

    Biochemical measures of changes in liver, infection, kidney and electrolyte-status and urinary excretion of calcium.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Peter Vestergaard

Other

Collaborators

  • Aalborg University

Registry information

Acronym: DENOCINA

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jan 23, 2017
Registry last updated
May 25, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.