Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04404374

Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects With A-PRF+ or EMD

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to clinically evaluate and compare the healing of intrabony defects after treatment with advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF+) to enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in periodontitis patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Semmelweis University, Department of Periodontology

Budapest, 1088, Hungary

About this study

Thirty (30) intrabony defects of 18 patients (9 males, 9 females) were randomly divided in two treatment groups: test (n = 15) and control (n = 15). The intrabony defects were filled with A-PRF+ (n=15) in the test group, respectively with EMD in the control group, and fixed with sutures to ensure wound closure and stability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • no systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy, a good level of oral hygiene, he presence of a 2-, 3-, or combined 2-3-wall intrabony defect with a defect angle of 20-40 (+/- 5) degrees, with a minimum PPD of 6 mm and intrabony component of a minimum 4 mm as detected on radiographs, no smoking

Exclusion criteria

  • systemic diseases that could influence the outcome of the therapy, poor oral hygiene, smoking, horizontal bone loss

Treatment and study plan

A-PRF/EMD

Procedure

Comparing healing effect of an autologous and a xenogenic product

Primary outcomes

  1. Periodontal clinical parameters - to determine the clinical attachment level (CAL)

    Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 month and after 12 month

    With a calibrated periodontal probe we are examining the changes of periodontal probing depth (PPD) and gingival recession (GR) after surgical procedure in mm, the two parameters are used to determine the clinical attachment level (CAL).

  2. Periodontal clinical parameters

    Time frame: Change from baseline after 6 month and after 12 month

    With a calibrated periodontal probe we are examining the changes of periodontal probing depth (PPD) and gingival recession (GR) after surgical procedure in mm, the two parameters are used to determine the clinical attachment level (CAL).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Semmelweis University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy of a New-generation Platelet-rich Fibrin vs. Enamel Matrix Derivatives in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects : a Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
May 27, 2020
Registry last updated
Mar 5, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.