Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04323540

Treatment of Peri-implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation

The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.

Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures, including an aesthetic self-evaluation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

George Eastman Dental Hospital

Roma, 00100, Italy

About this study

The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects.

More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and resorbable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects.

The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region).

Outcomes will include clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), probing depth (PD), mucosal recession (MR), defect resolution (a composite outcome defined as the simultaneous absence of PD > 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] and/or suppuration [SUP], and bone level changes > 0.5 mm), plaque index (PI), BOP, suppuration on probing, suppuration on palpation, surgical duration, the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including aesthetic self-evaluation.

PROMs will assess patients' perception of surgery, pain intensity, perceived swelling, perceived bleeding, and analgesic intake.

Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. EHI will be assessed at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic bone levels at 12 and 24 months will be compared with those recorded on radiographs obtained at baseline. All PROMs variables, as well as aesthetic self-evaluation, will be collected using specially designed questionnaires completed by the patients. PROMs data will be recorded at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery on the day of surgery (day 0), and daily from postoperative day 2 to day 7. Aesthetic self-evaluation will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • · Be able and willing to provide consent and sign the informed consent form.
  • Be able and willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up appointments required by the study protocol.
  • Age>18 years
  • Presence of at least one implant affected with peri-implantitis, defined as the following con-dition: at least one site presenting peri-implant probing depth (PPD) >6 mm and simultane-ous presence of profuse BoP/SUP and a radiographically documented change in bone level greater than initial bone remodeling. In the likely event that a baseline radiographic image is absent, the bone level will be compared to where it would likely have been at the time of implant insertion and a difference of >3 mm from that level will be considered.
  • Implants in function (i.e. loaded) for at least 1 year.
  • Screw- and cement-retained suprastructures for both fixed and removable prostheses.

Exclusion criteria

  • Compromised systemic health which contraindicates the study procedures.
  • Pregnant or nursing women.
  • Cigarette smoking>5 per day
  • Systemic conditions compromising healing (i.e. diabetes mellitus). Patients with diabe-tes mellitus types I or II will be asked to provide information regarding their most re-cent HbA1c values. Only patients with HbA1c<7% will be enrolled.
  • Patients taking medications known to interfere with gingival or bone metabolism.

Treatment and study plan

Peri-implantitis reconstructive surgery

Procedure

For both arms (excluding the already included information): defect debridement, removal of debris using titanium curettes, titanium brushes on the implant surface, irrigation with saline, application of sterile cotton pellets with saline solution. Grafting with (experimental) xenograft and soft tissue, or xenograft alone (control). Suture.

Specific to control group (active comparator): the peri-implant defect will be filled with xenograft, and a collagen membrane will be fitted and trimmed to the defect area.

Specific to test/experimental group: same as above (for control). In addition a soft tissue graft will be harvested from the palate and sutured to the buccal flap. The entire flap will then be sutured to the lingual flap.

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical attachment level

    Time frame: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket

Secondary outcomes

  1. Probing depth

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    linear distance (mm) from the gingival margin to the bottom of the pocket

  2. Disease resolution

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    No PD greater than or equal to 5 mm and simultaneous absence of BOP/SUP and no more than 0.5 mm change between 2 weeks and 12 and 24 months on radiograph

  3. Mucosal recession

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the gingival margin

  4. plaque index (minimum value 0, maximum 1)

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    binary outcome: yes/ no detected running the probe into the peri-implant sulcus

  5. profuse bleeding

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    abundant bleeding evoked upon probing immediately after

  6. BOP

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    bleeding upon probing: bleeding evoked upon probing after 1 second

  7. suppuration

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    Binary: yes or no, detected upon probing or digital palpation

  8. Gingival thickness

    Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months

    Measured in a horizontal direction at 1 mm from the gingival margin

  9. PROMs - Patient perception of surgery

    Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery

    Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate a more positive perception of the surgical procedure.

  10. Radiographic bone levels

    Time frame: 2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months

    radiographic bone level changes between the 2 week and 12 and 24 month follow-ups

  11. PROMs - Patient-reported pain intensity

    Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery

    Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.

  12. PROMs - Patient-reported swelling

    Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery

    Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived swelling.

  13. PROMs - Patient-reported bleeding

    Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery

    Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived bleeding.

  14. PROMs - Analgesic consumption

    Time frame: 12 hours after surgery and daily from day 2 through day 7 after surgery

    Number of analgesic tablets consumed by the patient during the first postoperative week.

  15. PROMs - aesthetic self-evaluation

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months

    Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the esthetic outcome.

  16. Early wound healing

    Time frame: 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery

    Wound healing scores ranging from 1 to 5 by the surgeon

  17. Surgical duration

    Time frame: at the surgery

    The interval between the initial incision and placement of the final suture, measured in minutes.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Belgrade

Registry information

Official study title

Surgical Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 26, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.