George Eastman Dental Hospital
Roma, 00100, Italy
NCT Number: NCT04323540
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects. More specifically, the control group will be a reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). The test group will be the same, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to grafting materials.
Outcomes will include CAL, PD, MR, defect resolution, PI, BoP, SUPP, surgical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures, including an aesthetic self-evaluation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Roma, 00100, Italy
The study will aim to compare two modalities in the reconstructive treatment of peri-implantitis defects.
More specifically, the control group will be a "pure" reconstructive approach (xenograft bone graft granules and resorbable collagen membrane, BioOss and BioGide, Geistlich, Wolhusen). This is in accordance with gold standard practices of reconstructive therapy of peri-implant defects.
The test group will be treated with the same approach and materials, with the exception of an autologous sub-epithelial connective tissue palatal graft, sutured beneath the flap, which will be used in addition to the grafting materials. The graft will be harvested from the homolateral palate (molar region).
Outcomes will include clinical attachment level (CAL; primary outcome), probing depth (PD), mucosal recession (MR), defect resolution (a composite outcome defined as the simultaneous absence of PD > 5 mm, bleeding on probing [BOP] and/or suppuration [SUP], and bone level changes > 0.5 mm), plaque index (PI), BOP, suppuration on probing, suppuration on palpation, surgical duration, the Early Wound Healing Index (EHI), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including aesthetic self-evaluation.
PROMs will assess patients' perception of surgery, pain intensity, perceived swelling, perceived bleeding, and analgesic intake.
Clinical measurements will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. EHI will be assessed at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Radiographic bone levels at 12 and 24 months will be compared with those recorded on radiographs obtained at baseline. All PROMs variables, as well as aesthetic self-evaluation, will be collected using specially designed questionnaires completed by the patients. PROMs data will be recorded at 4, 8, and 12 hours after surgery on the day of surgery (day 0), and daily from postoperative day 2 to day 7. Aesthetic self-evaluation will be recorded at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For both arms (excluding the already included information): defect debridement, removal of debris using titanium curettes, titanium brushes on the implant surface, irrigation with saline, application of sterile cotton pellets with saline solution. Grafting with (experimental) xenograft and soft tissue, or xenograft alone (control). Suture.
Specific to control group (active comparator): the peri-implant defect will be filled with xenograft, and a collagen membrane will be fitted and trimmed to the defect area.
Specific to test/experimental group: same as above (for control). In addition a soft tissue graft will be harvested from the palate and sutured to the buccal flap. The entire flap will then be sutured to the lingual flap.
Time frame: change from baseline to: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the bottom of the pocket
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
linear distance (mm) from the gingival margin to the bottom of the pocket
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
No PD greater than or equal to 5 mm and simultaneous absence of BOP/SUP and no more than 0.5 mm change between 2 weeks and 12 and 24 months on radiograph
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
linear distance (mm) from the implant platform to the gingival margin
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
binary outcome: yes/ no detected running the probe into the peri-implant sulcus
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
abundant bleeding evoked upon probing immediately after
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
bleeding upon probing: bleeding evoked upon probing after 1 second
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Binary: yes or no, detected upon probing or digital palpation
Time frame: 6, 12, 18, 24 months
Measured in a horizontal direction at 1 mm from the gingival margin
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate a more positive perception of the surgical procedure.
Time frame: 2 weeks, 12 months, 24 months
radiographic bone level changes between the 2 week and 12 and 24 month follow-ups
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived swelling.
Time frame: 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and Days 2-7 after surgery
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived bleeding.
Time frame: 12 hours after surgery and daily from day 2 through day 7 after surgery
Number of analgesic tablets consumed by the patient during the first postoperative week.
Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months
Assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the esthetic outcome.
Time frame: 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery
Wound healing scores ranging from 1 to 5 by the surgeon
Time frame: at the surgery
The interval between the initial incision and placement of the final suture, measured in minutes.
George Eastman Dental Hospital, Italy
Other
Surgical Reconstructive Treatment of Peri-Implantitis With or Without Simultaneous Soft Tissue Augmentation: a Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06083246
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Pavia, Lombardy, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05024760
Dental Implant Failed, Implant Infection
Tacoma, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07700628
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Caserta, CE, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT07678892
Mouth Diseases, Peri-Implantitis
Kristianstad, Sweden
View Trial Details