NCT Number: NCT00397722
Treatment Of Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder
GW876008 is a drug which may change mans reaction to stress, by decreasing the fear, physical and behavior symptoms that people with SocAD experience in social situations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year–64 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary location
GSK Investigational Site, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- are diagnosed with generalized social anxiety disorder/social phobia.
Exclusion criteria
- have a diagnosis of major depressive disorder
- have a history of Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder, or Bipolar Disorder.
Treatment and study plan
paroxetine
DrugOther names: GW876008
Primary outcomes
-
Change from randomization in the clinician-administered LSAS total score at the end of the treatment phase (Week 12)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
The LSAS is an investigator-rated scale consisting of 48 questions concerning various social situations. The LSAS is the first psychiatric assessment at all post-screening visits. A qualified independent efficacy rater scored the participant's "fear or anxiety" and "avoidance" of social situations on 4-point scale : where, 0= None, 1= Mild, 2= Moderate, 3= Severe. Scores were recorded in participant's source documents. The LSAS total score was the sum of each of the forty-eight individual responses. Day 0 was Baseline and change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 12 value. Data for adjusted mean and SE is presented.
-
Change from randomization on the LSAS Fear subscale score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) Week 12
The LSAS consisted of 24 fear responses. All individual items were rated on a scale 0 (none) -3 (severe) with higher scores indicating more severe fear. The LSAS fear subscale score was the sum of each of the 24 individual responses. If at least 22 items of the items making up the subscale of interest were present at a particular time point, the subscale score was calculated as Sum of non-missing items multiplied with 24/Number of non-missing items. If less than 22 of the items making up the score of interest were available for a participant at a particular time point, the subscale score was not calculated for that time point. Day 0 was Baseline and change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 12 value. Data for adjusted mean and SE is presented.
-
Change from randomization on the LSAS Avoidance subscale score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
The LSAS consisted of 24 avoidance responses. All individual items were rated on a scale 0 (never) -3 (always) with higher scores indicating more severe avoidance. The LSAS avoidance subscale Score was the sum of each of the 24 individual responses. If at least 22 items of the items making up the subscale of interest were present at a particular time point, the total score was calculated as Sum of non-missing items multiplied with 24/Number of non-missing items. If less than 22 of the items making up the score of interest were available for a participant at a particular time point, the subscale score was not calculated for that time point. . Day 0 was Baseline and change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from Week 12 value. Data for adjusted mean and SE is presented.
-
Change from randomization on the Social Avoidance and Distress Scale (SADS) total score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Week 12
The SADS is a 28 item questionnaire. The total score was obtained by summing together the responses for all 28 items from the SADS questionnaire. Each individual item was rated as true or false. One point was given where items 2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 26 were marked as true and 1 point when each of the remaining items were marked as false. This gave a possible range of possible scores from 0 to 28 with higher scores indicating more severe disorder. If at least 26 of the items making up the total score were present at a particular time point, the total score was calculated as Sum of scores for non-missing items multiplied with 28/Number of non-missing items. If less than 26 of the items making up the score of interest were available for a participant at a particular time point, the total score was not calculated for that time point.
Secondary outcomes
-
Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) findings any time post randomization
Time frame: Up to Week 12
All 12-lead ECGs were digitally acquired by a qualified clinician and transmitted to a specified central laboratory. The ECG traces were interpreted by a qualified physician. Number of participants with abnormal ECG findings were reported.
-
Change from Randomization in Vital Signs: systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) Up to Week 12
Vital signs were measured at all scheduled study visits which included SBP and DBP. Change from Baseline values were presented for SBP and DBP. Day 0 was Baseline and change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from value at scheduled study visits. Data presented for maximum (max) increase-decrease in SBP/DBP.
-
Change from Randomization in vital signs : heart rate
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and up to Week 12
Vital signs were measured at all scheduled study visits which included heart rate. Change from Baseline values were presented for heart rate. Day 0 was Baseline and change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline value from value at scheduled study visits. Data presented for max increase-decrease in heart rate.
-
Number of participants with chemistry data outside the normal range (Any time post-Randomization)
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Number of participants with chemistry values outside the normal range up to 12 weeks were presented. Chemistry parameters included: Calcium, Bicarbonate, Chloride, Creatine Kinase, Creatinine, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium, Urea and Uric Acid.
-
Number of participants with hematology data outside the normal range (Any time post-Randomization)
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Number of participants with hematology values outside the normal range up to 12 weeks were presented. Hematology parameters included: Basophils, Eosinophils, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Lymphocytes, Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV), Monocytes, Platelet count, Red blood cell, Total neutrophils and White blood cells.
-
Number of participants with All adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events SAE)
Time frame: Up to 18 Weeks
Data for number of participants who presented one or more adverse events (serious or non serious) was reported. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence (MO) in a participant temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product (MP), whether or not considered related to the MP and can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with its use. The SAE was any untoward MO that, at any dose, results in death, life threatening, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, results in or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, congenital abnormality or birth defect, that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization but may jeopardize the participant or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes listed in this definition.
-
Trough Concentration (Ctrough)
Time frame: Up to Week 12 (pre dose)
Ctrough is the lowest concentration reached by a drug before the next dose is administered. Blood samples for Pharmacokinetic assessment were collected pre dose at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12.
-
Exposure at steady state (AUC (0-τ))
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Blood samples for Pharmacokinetic assessment were collected pre dose at Week 1, Week 2, Week 4, Week 8 and Week 12. for AUC (0-τ)
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Study CRH103390: A 12 Week Flexible Dose Study of GW876008, Placebo and Active Control (Paroxetine) in the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SocAD)
Important dates
- Study start
- 2006
- Primary completion
- 2007
- Study completion
- 2007
- First posted
- Nov 9, 2006
- Registry last updated
- Jul 11, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
The Efficacy of Prospective Mental Imagery in Enhancing Approach Motivation Among Socially Anxious Individuals
NCT06977087
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Marburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsSocial Safety Learning in the Brain Oxytocin System
NCT05968651
Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsEpidemiological Study on the Prevalence of Mental Disorders in Slovakia
NCT07129408
Agoraphobia, Alcohol Addiction
Bratislava, Slovakia
View Trial DetailsIntegrated Mental Health Care and Vocational Rehabilitation to Individuals on Sick Leave Due to Anxiety and Depression
NCT02872051
Anxiety Disorders, Behavior
Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark
View Trial Details