Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00539175

Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy With Photon Stimulation

1. Objectives:

1. To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy. 2. To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.

2. Research Design

This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of 120 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. These 120 will be randomly assigned treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We expect that some patients will drop out, and our goal is 100 treated patients, for statistical purposes. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. There will also be an Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices. Data from these individuals will be used to calculate potential cost savings.

3. Methodology:

Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.

4. Finding:

To date, we have just completed 120 patients, using a block randomization scheme not previously reported in this field. We have collected data on nerve function, pain, quality of life, and skin circulation. The data will remain stored until the study is complete to preserve the blinded nature of the project. Data analysis is still incomplete.

4. Clinical Significance

Diabetic neuropathy is a chronic and progressive condition that potentially leads to disabling pain, and worse, amputation, for many individuals in the United States each year. Present treatments utilize antiseizure medications, opiate analgesics, and antidepressants, and are inconsistently effective. Development of a new treatment strategy potentially could have significant benefit for a great many patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

VA Northern California Health Care System

Martinez, California, 94553, United States

About this study

  • PURPOSE, METHODS, AND PROCEDURES:
  • Purpose:
  • To assess the efficacy of Photon Stimulation compared with placebo, in treating the pain of diabetic neuropathy.
  • To show that Photonic Stimulation for the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy is cost effective compared to traditional medical interventions. The latter will be explored by an extensive search of the literature and from an equal number of patients being treated in traditional medical practices using traditional medical interventions. At the conclusion of the study the data will be analyzed for cost-benefits and the possibility of crafting a best-practices approach to treat these syndromes that cost billions of dollars a year in health care expenses and lost productivity.
  • Methods

This is a double blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study of approximately 170 patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. The study sample size is 170 patients. Of these 120 will be given treatments utilizing Photon Therapy, using a defined treatment protocol. We plan to recruit 120 patients to allow for drop out, and to provide 100 completed patients, as requested by FDA. The Photon Therapy group will be split into two groups, one group that receives Active Photon Therapy and one group that will be treated with the same type of equipment that has been modified to emit no infrared photons (Non Active Photon Therapy Group ("Placebo")). The patients in the "Non Active Photon Therapy Group" will be offered an Active Photon Treatment Session after completion of the study. The patients in the Photon Therapy Groups will be randomized. The Historical Control Group of patients, fifty, will have received traditional medical interventions (e.g., narcotics, seizure medications) in traditional medical practices.

  • Procedures: Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and have signed a valid informed consent will be eligible to participate in the study. After screening, subjects in the Photon Therapy groups (both active and nonactive) will undergo four treatment sessions. The first treatment session will vary from the second, third and fourth. During all treatment session, each patient will be imaged with the TIP Infrared Camera before, and after treatment. Infrared imaging can visualize skin temperature changes in a noninvasive manner (2). The first treatment will utilize slightly different protocol than subsequent visits, reduced Photon dosage, 120 instead of 240 joules. Proprioception and protective sensation, characterized by the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test, and visual and analog pain scoring will also be evaluated before and after each Photon Therapy treatment.
  • SUBJECT SELECTION: Subjects were initially recruited from the PI's clinic, from a list of patients diagnosed by Dr. Beckley (Electromyographer) with painful diabetic neuropathy, and from local referrals. In October 2004, we received permission to post flyers and solicit patients (identified by Dr Beckley) from primary providers (flyer and letter attached). We also recruited by posting flyers in VANCHCS facilities, and with VANCHCS diabetes educators. Word of mouth also provided many subjects. In September 2006 we modified the flyer to reflect a focused recruitment at Mather. Vulnerable populations will not be studied.
  • RISKS: The potential risks to subjects include physical, psychological, social and economic. These are not likely: The physical risks include discomfort from the photon machine. The psychological risks include boredom. The social risks include being labeled as having a chronic illness, and the risk of loss of privacy. The economic risk includes time off from work that may be needed to participate in the treatment program. Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
  • BENEFITS: Individual subjects may derive benefit via pain relief; this would also obtain to the whole group of patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
  • RISK-BENEFIT RATIO: The risk is minimal, and the benefit minimal to moderate (potentially greater).
  • SAFETY MONITORING: Research staff will monitor for safety.
  • INFORMED CONSENT PROCEDURES: The PI (Dr. Swislocki) and his staff (Ms. Orth, Ms. Weisshaupt) will conduct, obtain, and document informed consent within VANCHCS facilities.
  • PRIVACY AND CONFIDENTIALITY PROTECTIONS: Confidentiality will be maintained as much as possible, by storing paper data in locked offices, without name identifiers, and electronic data on spreadsheets on password-protected computers in locked offices.
  • COSTS TO SUBJECTS: No added expenses are expected. No compensation is proposed.
  • DISCLOSURE OF PERSONAL AND FINANCIAL INTEREST IN THE RESEARCH STUDY AND SPONSOR: The Principal Investigator has no personal or financial interests in the research or personal or financial interest in the entity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with diabetes mellitus with painful neuropathy, defined as foot pain >/ 3 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, chronic foot pain of at least 6 months' duration, and pain characterized as burning, shooting, or stabbing in nature.
  • Patients needed to have capacity to provide informed consent and be able to make serial visits for scheduled treatments.

Exclusion criteria

  • A history of peripheral vascular disease
  • Vitamin B12 deficiency
  • Low back pain with radiculopathy; Or
  • Another painful condition that was difficult to distinguish from painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Treatment and study plan

infrared light

Device

pulsed infrared light will be applied to feet, ankles and popliteal fossae of patients with diabetic neuropathy

infrared light; placebo

Device

patients will be exposed to the same machine used to provide pulsed infrared light, but the light emitting diodes will not be activated. All other aspects of the treatment will be the same. The patient and investigator will be blind to treatment assignment.

Primary outcomes

  1. pain intensity

    Time frame: 1 week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Semmes-Weinstein sensation, proprioception, quality of life

    Time frame: one week

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

East Bay Institute for Research and Education

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2004
Study completion
2006
First posted
Oct 4, 2007
Registry last updated
Oct 4, 2007

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.