Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06258837

Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Personalized Surgery in Children With Small Tonsils

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a novel personalized surgical approach to the standard AT in children with small tonsils (ST). This will be accomplished by randomizing children with ST and OSA to one of these two treatments and comparing outcomes after 6 months. It is the investigators' central hypothesis that a personalized drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE)-directed surgical approach that uses existing procedures to address the specific fixed and dynamic anatomic features causing obstruction (ie, anatomic endotypes) in each child with ST will perform better than the currently recommended standard first line approach of AT. This novel approach may improve OSA outcomes and reduce the burden of unnecessary AT or secondary surgery for persistent OSA after an ineffective AT. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose to study children aged 2-17 years with small tonsils and OSA.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

2 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is common in children with an estimated prevalence of 1-6%. Untreated pediatric OSA is associated with hypertension, autonomic dysfunction, attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder, neurocognitive deficits, poor school performance, poor quality of life, and a >200% increase in health care utilization compared to controls. Adenotonsillar hypertrophy is the primary risk factor for pediatric OSA, and adenotonsillectomy (AT) is the recommended first line treatment. However, the prevalence of persistent OSA after AT has been reported to be at least 20% among children with large tonsils, indicating that AT may not be the optimal intervention in all cases. Although the prevalence of small tonsils in children with OSA symptoms is up to 70%, there is currently no clear evidence on the outcome of AT in children with small tonsils. It has been shown that clinic assessments of tonsil size do not correlate with OSA severity or response to AT, leaving confusion about how best to treat OSA in children with small tonsils. This knowledge gap represents an opportunity to apply a personalized treatment approach and improve outcomes.

DISE entails passage of a flexible endoscope through the nose into the pharynx and enables direct observation of the sites and patterns of upper airway obstruction during sedated sleep. DISE was developed to guide surgical decisions in adult OSA, and in recent years has also been used to design personalized surgical interventions in children. To help standardize DISE assessments, the investigators previously developed and validated the DISE Rating Scale in children based on ordinal ratings of maximal airway obstruction (none, partial, complete) at six anatomic sites from the nose to the larynx.

The investigators also demonstrated that DISE ratings of adenotonsillar obstruction during sedated sleep are strongly associated with both OSA severity and response to AT, unlike clinic assessments of tonsil size. The investigators' preliminary data and other published studies have identified a high prevalence of non-adenotonsillar obstruction that can occur at the nose, palate, base of tongue, and larynx. Surgery that is tailored to the specific anatomic sites of obstruction observed during DISE may improve pediatric OSA outcomes, but existing studies are small, uncontrolled case series in heterogeneous study populations. There are no trials directly comparing AT and DISE-directed surgery in the common scenario of surgically naïve children with small tonsils.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of a novel personalized surgical approach to the standard AT in children with small tonsils (ST). This will be accomplished by randomizing children with ST and OSA to one of these two treatments and comparing outcomes after 6 months. It is the investigators' central hypothesis that a personalized drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE)-directed surgical approach that uses existing procedures to address the specific fixed and dynamic anatomic features causing obstruction (i.e., anatomic endotypes) in each child with ST will perform better than the currently recommended standard first line approach of AT. This novel approach may improve OSA outcomes and reduce the burden of unnecessary AT or secondary surgery for persistent OSA after an ineffective AT. To test this hypothesis, the investigators propose to study children aged 2-17 years with small tonsils and OSA.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

To be in the study:

  • Child has a diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA diagnosed by PSG (oAHI ≥ 5).
  • Child age is 2.00 to 17.99 years of age.
  • Child has small tonsils (Brodsky 1+ or 2+) noted during routine physical exam.
  • Caregiver can provide signed and dated consent and is 18 years of age or older at the time of consent.
  • Caregiver can speak, read, and write in English or Spanish.
  • Caregiver is primary caretaker of the child.
  • Child is not expecting their own child.
  • Child is eligible for surgical treatment

Cannot be in the study if:

  • Child has history of previous tonsillectomy, tonsillotomy, or partial tonsillectomy.
  • Child has any contraindication to surgery (e.g. bleeding disorders).
  • Child has significant cardiopulmonary comorbidity besides OSA requiring supplemental oxygen, subglottic or tracheal stenosis, tracheostomy dependence.
  • Child has a genetic abnormality, Down syndrome, neuromuscular disorder, craniofacial anomaly.
  • Caregiver is unwilling or unable to comply with study procedures.
  • Child is or plans to become a parent themselves.

Treatment and study plan

DISE-Directed Surgery

Procedure

Participants randomized to DISE-directed surgery will undergo one or more potential procedures in a single surgery (i.e. DISE and subsequent sleep surgery performed) concurrently under the same general anesthetic), depending on anatomic assessment.

Other names: sleep endoscopy

Adenotonsillectomy

Procedure

Tonsil and/or adenoid removal

Other names: AT

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (oAHI) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Objective results from sleep studies (polysomnography): Obstructive Apnea-Hypopnea Index (oAHI): 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores indicate higher disease burden. Scores can range from zero to two hundred.

  2. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: Total Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Objective results from sleep studies (polysomnography): Total Apnea-Hypopnea Index: 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores indicate higher disease burden. Scores can range from zero to two hundred.

  3. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: REM Apnea-Hypopnea Index (REM AHI) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Objective results from sleep studies (polysomnography): REM Apnea-Hypopnea Index REM AHI: 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores indicate higher disease burden. Scores can range from zero to two hundred.

  4. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: minimum Oxygen saturation (SpO2) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Objective results from sleep studies (polysomnography): Minimum Oxygen Saturation (Min SpO2): 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Lower scores indicate higher disease burden. Scores range from 0-100, although neither extreme is actually seen in patients.

  5. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: Oxyhemoglobin desaturation ≥ 3% Index (desat index) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Oxyhemoglobin desaturation ≥ 3% Index: 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores mean higher disease burden. Mild desaturation (< 5.0 events/h), moderate desaturation (≥ 5.0 events/h and < 10.0 events/h), and severe desaturation (≥ 10.0 events/h).

  6. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: Percent Total Sleep Time with ETCO2 > 50 mmHg at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    % Total Sleep Time with ETCO2 > 50 mmHg: 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores mean higher disease burden. Scores range from 0-100.

  7. Change from Baseline Polysomnography Measures: Max End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2) at 6 months

    Time frame: 6 month follow up sleep study (after surgery)

    Max End Tidal CO2 (ETCO2): 6 months follow up sleep study difference from baseline sleep study. Higher scores mean higher disease burden. Normal is 35-40 mmHg.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)-18 Questionnaire score

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Disease specific quality of life measure: 18 questions, scores range from 18-126; higher scores means higher disease burden

  2. Change in Generic PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life) Questionnaire score

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Generic quality of life measure: an age specific questionnaire with 23 questions (scores range from 0-100); higher scores indicate better quality of life.

  3. Change in Generic PedsQL (Pediatric Quality of Life) Questionnaire answers

    Time frame: 6 month follow up

    Quality of life: questionnaire results by individual question. Adjusted scores range from 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

  4. Total Drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) score

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    Subjective ratings of degree of obstruction at 6 levels of the upper airway, done by surgeon. Scores range from 0 to 12. Higher scores means more breathing obstruction, or more disease burden.

  5. Adverse Events

    Time frame: 24 hour period after surgery

    Did any adverse events occur in the post-operative time frame? This is a yes/no question, looking at the following outcomes: dehydration and poor oral intake due to post-operative pain, post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage, and respiratory compromise.

  6. Change in Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Questionnaire answers

    Time frame: Baseline versus 6 month follow up

    Assesses behavioral and emotional problems: questionnaire results by total score and by "syndrome scale scores". Adjusted norms scores range from 0.0-1.0; higher scores indicate greater problems.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Derek Lam, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

503-494-9419

Eleni O'Neill

CONTACT

[email protected]

503-494-3569

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oregon Health and Science University

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Michigan

Registry information

Acronym: TOPS-ST

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 14, 2024
Registry last updated
Jul 6, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.