Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03667313

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis 2 Study

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting balloon catheters (SEB) and iopromide-coated paclutaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) in the treatment of bare metal (BMS) - or drug-eluting stents restenosis (DES-ISR).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Cardiovascular Department of University Hospital

Ostrava, 70852, Czechia

About this study

Current therapy for in-stent restenosis (ISR) is based on the drug-eluting stents (DES) or drug-eluting balloon catheters (DEB). In clinical practice, paclitaxel is used as an effective antiproliferative agent loaded into DEB (paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheters; PEB).

In contrast to paclitaxel, sirolimus is difficult to deliver on the balloon surface, due to insufficient tissue uptake and shorter tissue retention of limus drugs. It was found that phospholipid-encapsulated sirolimus nanoparticles could be used for coating balloon catheters to provide efficient drug transfer to vessel wall with high tissue concentration.

This prospective randomized non-inferiority study compares the efficacy of new sirolimus-eluting balloon catheters (SEB) and iopromide-coated paclutaxel-eluting balloon catheters (PEB) in the treatment of bare metal (BMS) - or drug-eluting stents restenosis (DES-ISR).

The primary end-point is in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 12 months as measured by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA).

Secondary end-points are the incidence of binary ISR (˃50% DS) and the overall incidence of 12-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE; cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction [AIM], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with BMS- or DES-ISR (˃50% diameter stenosis; DS)
  • ≥18 years of age
  • willing to sign an Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • concomitant diseases with an expected survival time of less than 12 months
  • or that limited the possibility of control coronary aniography (e.g., advanced renal failure).
  • impossibility of long-term (6 months) dual antiplatelet treatment

Treatment and study plan

sirolimus-eluting balloon (SEB) MagicTouch

Combination Product

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated with sirolimus-eluting balloon

Other names: MagicTouch

paclitaxel-eluting balloon (PEB) Sequent Please

Combination Product

Patients with coronary in-stent restenosis treated with paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Other names: Sequent Please

Primary outcomes

  1. Late lumem loss (LLL)

    Time frame: 12-month

    the diference between post-intervention mimimal lumen diameter (MLD) and 12-month MLD

Secondary outcomes

  1. repeated binary restenosis

    Time frame: 12-month

    recurrence of stenosis ≥50%

  2. major adverse cardiac events (MACE)

    Time frame: 12-month

    cardiovascular death, non-fatal acute myocardial infarction [AIM], or target vessel revascularization [TVR]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital Ostrava

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomised Study Comparing Efficacy of Treatment Coronary In-stent Restenosis Using Sirolimus-Eluting and Iopromide-Coated Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Catheters

Acronym: TIS2

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 12, 2018
Registry last updated
Dec 7, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.