Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04167514

Treatment of GVHD in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) Recipients Using AAT Plus Corticosteroids (CS) Compared With Corticosteroids Alone

Study CSL964_5001 will investigate the efficacy of AAT with corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone as first line therapy for patients with high-risk acute GVHD

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients 12 years of age or older
  • Initial presentation of acute GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for any indication
  • Any graft or donor source or conditioning intensity
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute GVHD requiring systemic therapy with corticosteroids

Exclusion criteria

  • Prior exogenous AAT exposure for GVHD prophylaxis
  • Relapsed, progressing, or persistent malignancy
  • de novo chronic GVHD or overlap syndrome developing before or present at the time of enrollment
  • Receiving other drugs for the treatment of GVHD
  • Receiving systemic CS for any indication within 7 days before the onset of acute GVHD

Treatment and study plan

Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT)

Biological

AAT is a lyophilized product for intravenous administration

Other names: Alpha-1 proteinase inhibitor (A1-P1)

Placebo

Drug

Albumin solution administered intravenously

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Response Rate (ORR) to Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Treatment

    Time frame: At Day 28

    The overall response is defined as having a CR or PR at Day 28, along with: being alive, free of any next-line GVHD therapy, and free of escalation of prednisone-equivalent steroid dose to 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg)/day or more. The percentage of participants with CR or PR is reported here. Wilson score confidence intervals (CIs) are reported here as a measure of dispersion. The CR was defined as a score of 0 for the GVHD staging in all evaluable organs. The PR was defined as an improvement in one or more organs involved with GVHD symptoms without progression in others. Acute GVHD was graded and assessed for response based on Harris (Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium [MAGIC]) criteria (stage 0, 1, 2, 3, 4) for skin, liver, upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and lower GI tract. Participants who had an escalation of prednisone-equivalent steroid dose to 2.5 mg/kg/day or higher were classified as non-responders (NR).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of Response (DOR)

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    The DOR was defined as time from the Day 28 response (CR or PR) until the first of the following events occurs: progression of acute GVHD, death, any next-line GVHD therapy, or escalation of prednisone-equivalent steroids to greater than or equal to (>=) 2.5 mg/kg/day. Wald CIs are reported here as a measure of dispersion.

  2. Number of Participants With Non-relapse Mortality (NRM) Event

    Time frame: At 6 and 12 months

    An event of NRM was death without prior evidence of relapse/progression of the primary disease, where relapse/progression was treated as a competing risk. Cumulative incidence of NRM at 6 and 12 months post-randomization is reported here for this outcome measure.

  3. Number of Overall and Progression-free Survival Events

    Time frame: At 6 and 12 months

    An event for overall survival (OS) was death from any cause, while an event for progression-free survival (PFS) was death from any cause or relapse/progression of the primary disease.

  4. Number of Participants With GVHD-free Survival

    Time frame: At Day 56

    GVHD-free survival was defined as participants being alive, free of acute or chronic GVHD, and free of any next-line GVHD therapy or escalation of steroids to >=2.5 mg/kg/day prednisone or equivalent for treatment of GVHD.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Response

    Time frame: At Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 86

    The percentage of participants with CR, PR (including subset with very good partial response [VGPR]), and treatment failure (TF). The designation of TF consisted of participants with NR, mixed response (MR) or progression. The initiation of additional systemic (next-line) GVHD therapies, escalation of prednisone equivalent steroid dose to >= 2.5 mg/kg/day, or death from any cause prior to the assessment timepoint was also considered a TF. Simultaneous Goodman CIs are provided for category proportions for each arm at each assessment time.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Response Allowing for Approved Next-line Therapy

    Time frame: At Day 7, 14, 21, 28, 56, and 86

    The percentage of participants with CR, PR (including subset with VGPR), and TF allowing for treatment with next-line therapy. The designation of TF consisted of participants with NR, MR, or progression. The escalation of prednisone-equivalent steroid dose to >= 2.5 mg/kg/day or death from any cause prior to the assessment timepoint was also considered a TF. Simultaneous Goodman CIs are provided for category proportions for each arm at each assessment time.

  7. Incidence of Grade 2 to 3 Systemic Infections

    Time frame: Up to 90 days (including 30 days after last dose of study drug)

    The cumulative incidence of Grade 2 to 3 systemic infections. Grade 2 to 3 systemic infections were defined according to the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) Manual of Procedures.

  8. Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 to 5 Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

    The incidence of Grade 3 to 5 TEAEs (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] Version 5.0). Wilson score CIs are reported here as a measure of dispersion.

  9. Cumulative Incidence of Chronic GVHD

    Time frame: At 6 and 12 months

    Chronic GVHD was defined per National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Criteria. Diagnosis of chronic GVHD of any severity (mild, moderate, or severe) was considered an event for this outcome measure, where death before cGVHD was treated as a competing risk.

  10. Cumulative Incidence of Disease Relapse/ Progression of Primary Disease

    Time frame: At 6 months and 12 months

    The cumulative incidence of relapse/progression of the primary disease, with death prior to relapse/progression treated as a competing risk. Death without prior relapse/progression was treated as a competing risk for relapse/progression.

Other outcomes

  1. DOR - Supplementary Analysis

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

    The DOR was defined as time from the Day 28 response (CR or PR) until the first of the following events occurs: death, any next-line GVHD therapy, or escalation of prednisone-equivalent steroids to >= 2.5 mg/kg/day. Wald CIs are reported here as a measure of dispersion.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

CSL Behring

Industry

Collaborators

  • Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Phase III Trial of Alpha 1 - Antitrypsin (AAT) Combined With Corticosteroids vs Corticosteroids Alone for the Treatment of High Risk Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD) Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2024
First posted
Nov 19, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.