Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06873867

Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: NPWT Combined With Type-I Collagen Based Advanced Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone

Widely used NPWT has been shown to promote wound healing by applying sub-atmospheric pressure, reducing oedema, and enhancing granulation tissue formation thus enhancing wound healing. However, its efficacy can vary based on wound characteristics and patient factors. High Purity Type-I Collagen (HPTC) based advanced skin substitute has emerged as a potential alternative for wound management, accelerating wound healing through extracellular matrix support. This study aims to compare the efficacy of NPWT combined with HPTC versus NPWT alone in the treatment of full-thickness wounds.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences

Mandya, Karnataka, 571448, India

About this study

Full-thickness wounds, extending through the dermis and affecting underlying tissues, present significant clinical challenges due to their complexity and prolonged healing times. Traditional treatments include surgical debridement, dressings, and advanced therapies like Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT). Widely used NPWT has been shown to promote wound healing by applying sub-atmospheric pressure, reducing oedema, and enhancing granulation tissue formation thus enhancing wound healing. However, its efficacy can vary based on wound characteristics and patient factors. High Purity Type-I Collagen (HPTC) based advanced skin substitute has emerged as a potential alternative for wound management, accelerating wound healing through extracellular matrix support. Studies suggest that HPTC promote cellular proliferation and angiogenesis, essential for tissue regeneration. Given the distinct mechanisms of action of NPWT and HPTC, a comparative evaluation is warranted to determine their relative efficacy in treating full-thickness wounds. This study aims to compare the efficacy of NPWT combined with HPTC versus NPWT alone in the treatment of full-thickness wounds.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be at least 18 years of age or older.
  • Presence of a full-thickness wound of at least 4 cm² and no more than 100 cm².
  • Wound duration of at least 4 weeks but not exceeding 6 months of standard of care prior to the initial screening visit.
  • Adequate vascular supply to the affected area
  • If the subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest ulcer satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designated as the target ulcer.
  • The subject must agree to attend the twice-weekly/weekly study visits required by the protocol.
  • The subject must be willing and able to participate in the informed consent process.

Exclusion criteria

  • A subject known to have a life expectancy of <6 months
  • Wounds with active infection / osteomyelitis requiring systemic antibiotics.
  • Presence of malignancy in the wound bed.
  • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c > 9%).
  • Use of immunosuppressive therapy or systemic corticosteroids.
  • Use of other advanced wound care products within the past 30 days
  • Known allergy to fish products or components of HPTC.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Presence of osteomyelitis or exposed bone, probes to bone or joint capsule on investigator's exam or radiographic evidence.
  • A subject receiving immunosuppressants (including systemic corticosteroids at doses greater than 10 mg of Prednisone per day or equivalent) or cytotoxic chemotherapy.
  • A subject with autoimmune or connective tissue disorders.
  • A subject who participated in a clinical trial involving treatment with an investigational product within the previous 30 days.

Treatment and study plan

High Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute

Device

In this wound care is covering with High Purity Type-I Collagen based Skin Substitute followed by a layer of non-adherent and porous dressing. After 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed

Negative pressure wound therapy

Device

In this wound care is by application of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy using a standard polyurethane foam. The NPWT will be removed after 5-7 days, wound examined and procedure is repeated as needed

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage Change in Wound Area

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    Percentage change in wound area from week 1 through week 7 measured manually with digital photography

Secondary outcomes

  1. Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study

    Time frame: 5 days

    Histopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for:

    vascular infiltration (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, neo-epithelialization (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, fibroblast activity (0-3 scale) - higher score means better, inflammatory response (0-3 scale) - lower score means better and collagen deposition (0-3 scale) - higher score means better

  2. Histopathological Analysis on Day 5 of Study - Capillary Density

    Time frame: 5 days

    Histopathological assessment will be done using biopsy on Day 0 of application to be compared with Day 5 after application of Type-I Collagen-based Skin Substitute or Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Histopathology assessed at day 0 and day 5, day 5 reported. Subsequently histopathology of biopsy will be done to look for capillary density (vessels per mm²) - higher count means better,

  3. Time to Achieve Complete Wound Closure

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    The time to achieve complete wound closure of the target ulcer by the end of 7 weeks

  4. Percentage of Participants to Obtain Complete Wound Closure

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    The percentage of participants that obtain complete wound closure over the 7 weeks (6 weeks treatment period plus 1 week follow up)

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥50% Wound Healing

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    Measurement of percentage of participants achieving ≥50% wound healing (epithelialization) assessed at follow up

  6. Mean Number of Application

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Mean number of rapplications of the NPWT+HPTC & NPWT alone used to obtain wound closure

  7. Number of Adverse Events

    Time frame: 6 weeks

    Number of adverse events related to the intervention (e.g., infection, allergic reactions, NPWT seal issues)

  8. Pain Score on Visual Analog Scale

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    Pain measured by a Visual Analog Scale with score range from 0 to 10, wherein 0="no pain" to 10="severe pain"

  9. Healed Wound Appearance Assessment Using Vancouver Scar Scale

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    The resultant new skin is assessed and documented at each visit using the Vancouver Scar Scale, up to 7 weeks, week 7 visit reported, assessing vascularity, pigmentation, pliability and height/thickness with total score ranging from 0 to 13 (lesser the score better the scar)

  10. Quality of Life Assessment

    Time frame: 7 weeks

    The EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) instrument is a standardized patient-reported outcome measure assessing overall health-related quality of life. It evaluates five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.

    Scoring and Ranges:

    • EQ-5D-5L Index Score - Derived from the five dimensions with five levels each (1 = no problems; 5 = extreme problems).

    The index score range varies by population value set; for most countries the possible scoring range is approximately -0.594 to 1.000. Higher scores indicate better health status (1.000 = full health).

    • EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) - A self-rated health scale from 0 to 100, where, 0 = the worst health you can imagine, 100 = the best health you can imagine. Higher values reflect better outcomes.

    Interpretation:

    Higher scores on both the EQ-5D-5L Index and EQ-VAS represent improved quality of life and a better treatment outcome.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Comparative Analysis in Treatment of Full-Thickness Wounds: NPWT Combined With Type-I Collagen Based Advanced Skin Substitute Versus NPWT Alone

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Mar 13, 2025
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.