SHP640
DrugInstill 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine [PVPI] 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
NCT Number: NCT03004924
The purpose of this study is to determine if an investigational treatment is effective compared with placebo and PVP-Iodine in the treatment of adults and children with bacterial conjunctivitis.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
University of the Sunshine Coast Clinical Trials Centre, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Instill 1 drop of SHP640 (povidone-iodine [PVPI] 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) ophthalmic suspension in each eye QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Instill 1 drop of PVP-I 0.6% ophthalmic solution in each eye 4 times QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Instill 1 drop of placebo ophthalmic solution in each eye 4 times QID (with a minimum of 2 hours between doses) for 7 days.
Time frame: Day 5
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from validated bulbar redness (VBR) scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 5
Bacterial eradication was defined as absence of all bacterial species present at or above pathological threshold at baseline in the study eye. Bacterial species were identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, using their unique protein patterns. Pathological threshold for individual bacterial species was based on colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL threshold levels established by Cagle and modified by Leibowitz for different ocular bacterial species found in the specimens collected from each participant. Data analysis was performed in SHP640 and placebo reporting groups only but not in PVP-I 0.6%.
Time frame: Day 3, 8 and 12
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score=0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with score of atleast 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 8 and 12
Bacterial eradication was defined as absence of all bacterial species present at or above pathological threshold at baseline in the study eye. Bacterial species were identified by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry, using their unique protein patterns. Pathological threshold for individual bacterial species was based on CFU/mL threshold levels established by Cagle and modified by Leibowitz for different ocular bacterial species found in the specimens collected from each participant.
Time frame: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale.
Time frame: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0 (No evidence of discharge in the conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on a 0 (No evidence of discharge in the conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Time frame: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with a score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. The study eye was defined as an eye with a score of at least 1 for both ocular conjunctival discharge and bulbar conjunctival redness at baseline.
Time frame: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Modified clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0 or 1. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Time frame: Day 3, 5, 8 and 12
Expanded clinical resolution was defined as a global clinical score of 0, 1, or 2 with neither injection nor discharge having a score of 2. Global clinical score was defined as the sum of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge scores. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 12
Clinical resolution was defined as absence (score of 0) of bulbar conjunctival injection and ocular conjunctival discharge in the study eye. Bulbar conjunctival injection was assessed based on 0 (Normal conjunctival vascular pattern) - 4 (Markedly prominent, intense diffuse hyperemia) scale which used pictures from VBR scale. Ocular conjunctival discharge was assessed based on 0 (No evidence of discharge in conjunctiva) - 3 (Abundant quantity of mucopurulent or purulent discharge) scale. Time to clinical resolution defined as the date on which a participant first reached clinical resolution minus the date of first dose of investigational product, plus 1.
Time frame: Baseline to Day 12
Rescue treatment with a licensed antibiotic according to the local standard of care was provided to participants if, in the judgment of the investigator, there was no clinical improvement or worsening of their condition to an extent that it would be in the best interest of the participant treated with an alternate therapy for safety reasons.
Time frame: From start of study drug administration up to 14 days
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Any AE that occured after the first dose of investigational product instillation was considered a TEAE.
Shire
Industry
A Phase 3, Multi-center, Randomized, Double-Masked Study to Evaluate the Clinical Efficacy and Safety of SHP640 (PVP-Iodine 0.6% and Dexamethasone 0.1%) Ophthalmic Suspension Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Bacterial Conjunctivitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06363292
Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Bacterial Infections
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT02432807
Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Bacterial Infections
Paramount, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02980523
Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Bacterial Infections
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
View Trial DetailsNCT00518089
Bacterial Conjunctivitis, Bacterial Infections
Downey, California, United States
View Trial Details