Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04518865

Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods

The study was directed to compare the treatment outcomes of subjects with Class II malocclusion who were treated with Herbst appliance before and after puberty.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

8 year–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Al-Azhar university

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

Thirty-six Class II patients were randomly selected and divided into two groups based on their stage of skeletal maturation: pre-pubertal group (18 patients, mean age 9.15± 1.5 years) and post-pubertal group (18 patients, mean age 16.3 ± 1.0 years). All patients were treated with metallic splint supported Herbst IV appliance.

Pretreatment and post-Herbst IV treatment cone beam CT(CBCT) scans were obtained for both groups. Dentoskeletal and TMJ measurements made on the CBCT scans were analysed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Skeletal Class II malocclusion with retrognathic mandible (ANB >5°, SNB<76°)
  • Normal growth pattern (SN/MP angle was in 25°- 35° range)
  • Unilateral or bilateral Class II molar relationship greater than or equal to one-half a cusp width.
  • Minimal or no crowding in the mandibular arch (0-5mm).
  • Average inclination or slight retroclination of the lower incisor.
  • An overjet greater than 5 mm.

Exclusion criteria

  • Skletal Class I
  • Craniofacial syndrome.

Treatment and study plan

Herbst Appliance

Device

The bottom line of the study is to investigate the changes after Herbst appliance treatment and relate it to the pubertal status of the skeletal class II patients using CBCT.

Primary outcomes

  1. Skeletal and dental changes

    Time frame: 8 months

    The DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) files from the pre and post CBCT scans were imported to Mimics software (Version 10.1, Materialise NV, Leuven, Belgium); and the cephalometric landmarks and planes were defined . Linear sagittal measurements of point A, point B, glenoid fossa, upper incisor, lower incisor, upper molars, and lower molars were recorded in relation to orbital perpendicular plane.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Condylar head position

    Time frame: 8 months

    The Most middle-superior point of the mandibular condyle was determined in sagittal, axial and coronal views. In the sagittal slice of the middle condylar head, a line was drowned through the widest measurement of the condylar heads visible on the slice, from this line, three lines were raised crossing the glenoid fossa at 45°, 90°, and 135° . Four linear measurements representing the anterosuperior, superior, posterosuperior, and posterior distance were taken from the glenoid fossa wall to the surface of the condyle

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Al-Azhar University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Treatment Effects of Herbst Appliance in Skeletal Class II Cases During Prepubertal and Postpubertal Periods: A Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Study

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 19, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 19, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.